Banner Advertiser

Friday, July 29, 2011

[ALOCHONA] Re: Disputed border survey and uranium




http://amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/07/29/95837

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Isha Khan <bdmailer@gmail.com> wrote:
Disputed border survey and uranium


http://dailynayadiganta.com/2011/06/28/fullnews.asp?News_ID=285625&sec=1




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Prove thy innocence



Prove thy innocence

Shahidur Rashid Talukdar

Altogether the instant reaction to the Norway incident, without any pursuance of proof or evidence, was that Muslim terror must be responsible for the attack. Once again, it has been proven that not all terrorists are Muslims

Prove your innocence — if you are a Muslim, because the media and the police believe Muslims are guilty by default.

Terror intimidates Muslims more than anyone else on earth. After any terrorist activity, inside their houses, Muslims try to put fingers into their ears so as not to hear the phrase: "another act of Muslim terror". Outside, in non-Muslim countries, they avoid eye-contact with others to avoid giving possible explanations that "it need not be an act of Muslim terror" or "I was not a part of it". For any terror attack anywhere, Muslims everywhere have to hang their heads in shame.

Muslims are the first suspects in almost all cases of violence the world over. The media usually has 'credible sources' and bigot analysts to hatch theories against Muslims and the police has 'informers' and matrix of terror links with names of Muslim youths inscribed as terrorists-in-line. Thus investigation, forensic analysis and fact finding all have become irrelevant. The new logic of both the media and the police is to blame Muslims first, and investigate later.

Moments after the horrific Norway bomb blast that killed seven people on July 22, followed by the massacre of 85 teenagers, speculations started regarding the possible culprits. Renowned media group, the BBC — considered objective — started speculating on the following night that the Islamist group al Qaeda could be behind the attacks, although the next morning they had to change their tone in front of the evidence. As The Sun labelled the attacks as "Norway's 9/11", The Guardian was not behind in their suspicion and analysis of jihadists' role in the bloody episode.

The American media's reaction was not different either. Fox News' 'O'Reilly Factor' not only suspected the Norway killing spree as another incident of Islamic terror, the guest host — Laura Ingraham — even attempted to link it with the atrocious 9/11 that happened in the US a decade ago by reminding the audience about the Ground Zero mosque to be built in Manhattan. No doubt she would succeed in her effort to multiply the right-wing American hatred against the Muslims and Islam.

Blaming the jihadists, the Wall Street Journal reported, "Norway is targeted for being true to western norms." Meanwhile, on The Washington Post's website, Jennifer Rubin wrote, "This is a sobering reminder for those who think it is too expensive to wage a war against jihadists." Altogether the instant reaction to the incident, without any pursuance of proof or evidence, was that Muslim terror must be responsible for the attack.

However, within a day the whole story had to be changed, as the right-wing Christian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik, with a background of hating Muslims and liberals, claimed responsibility for the attacks, exposing media bigotry to malign Islam's image. Once again, it has been proven that not all terrorists are Muslims.

The same thing happens everywhere. Minutes after the Mumbai blasts on July 13, the Indian TV channels propagated the theory that Indian Mujahedeen (IM), deemed to be an Indian Muslim extremist group, could be behind the blast, although security agencies and the police took hours before adopting the hypothesis — solely on the basis of spurious previous trends. Based on their guesswork, the Mumbai police, as usual, detained several Muslims for questioning. One of those detained — Faiz Usmani — died while in police custody on July 17, sparking allegations of police brutality.

It has been more than a week, yet the investigating agencies have found no evidence to support their claims against the IM nor those detained. The tameness of the media and police administration reflects that — Muslims have been harassed, some Muslims have been detained, and one of them got killed (all without any evidence). So what? Does it really matter? The Muslims are presumed guilty, by the unwritten rule, until proven innocent.

This trend is not new. In the past, although there have been occasions in which Muslim groups have been found linked with terrorist activities, extremist Hindutva terrorists have also been proven to have carried out half a dozen attacks in India, such as bomb blasts in Samjhauta Express, Makkah Masjid, Ajmer Sharif in (2007), and Malegaon (2008) — the list goes on. When the right-wing Hindutva groups are known to have established links with the Indian military and intelligence agencies to carry out terrorist activities, yet raising fingers against them is an anathema.

The level of hypocrisy in the attitude of the police and the media is conspicuous. If a Muslim commits an act of terror, it is a terror plot but if a non-Muslim does, it is just an 'act of violence'. If a Muslim is suspected in a terror act, he is an Islamic terrorist while a proven non-Muslim figure behind terror activities is merely 'an accused'.

If this is how people's sentiments against Muslims are aroused, how can the 1.5 billion Muslims live in peace with others and what message are we giving to the younger and future generations?

The writer is a PhD student in Economics at Texas Tech University, USA. He blogs at http://glimpsesofatraveler.srtalukdar.com

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C07%5C28%5Cstory_28-7-2011_pg3_3

__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] India wants total surrender: Beware of these RAW writers

... and Islamist Paki Agents in B.D. want total domination of the world.

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Isha Khan <bdmailer@...> wrote:
>
> ------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Zoglul Husain <zoglul@...>
> Date: Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:54 PM
> Subject: RE: India wants total surrender
> To: Isha Khan <bdmailer@...>
>
> I thank Zana Ghutekurani for refuting the anti-Bangladesh false propaganda
> of Bhaskar Roy. I refer also to Shah Ahmad Reza's article in Amar Desh, 15
> June 2011, where he refuted Bhaskar Roy:
> http://www.amardeshonline.com/pages/details/2011/06/15/87311.
>
> As we do not have a think tank for the patriots, we are dependent on
> individuals who sincerely do the work whatever way they can.
>
> *Bhaskar Roy* is a regular contributor to reportedly RAW's website, South
> Asia Analysis Group (SAAG). He frequently writes for the Bangladesh section
> of the SAAG website.
>
> One of the other regular contributors to this website is *B. Raman* or
> Bahukutumbi Raman, a former Additional Secretary (Retired), Cabinet
> Secretariat of the Government of India and former head of the
> counter-terrorism division of India's external intelligence agency RAW. He
> is currently the director of the Institute for Tropical Studies, Chennai. As
> a former intelligence official, B. Raman regularly writes about security,
> counter-terrorism and military issues regarding India and South Asia (from
> Wikipedia).
>
> There is another frequent contributor to SAAG, *Kazi Anwarul Masud*, a
> former diplomat and Secretary of Bangladesh. He projects the views of RAW.
>
> The website link of SAAG is:
> http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/
>
> The link of its Bangladesh section is:
> http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/searchb10.asp?search=bangladesh&searchtype=all
>
>
> The latest 30 articles in the Bangladesh section are: (You can access the
> other articles from the above link, by clicking the word 'NEXT' at the
> bottom of each page)
>
> 1. *LET BANGLADESH SOLVE ITS POLITICAL
> ISSUES*<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers46/paper4531.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 6/6/2011
>
> 2. AS PRIME MINISTER MANMOHAN SINGH PREPARES FOR BRICS
> SUMMIT<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers45/paper4422.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 12/4/2011
>
> 3. BANGLADESH: PAST MUST BE RESOLVED TO ENSURE
> FUTURE<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers45/paper4401.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 29/3/2011
>
> 4. THE FALL OF NOBEL LAUREATE MUHAMMAD
> YUNUS<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers44/paper4370.html>by
> Rajeev Sharma on 9/3/2011
>
> 5. DERAILING INDIA-BANGLADESH RELATIONS WILL COST
> BOTH<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers44/paper4325.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 9/2/2011
>
> 6. PAKISTAN: SALMAN TASEER'S MURDER & THE BLASPHEMY
> LAW<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers43/paper4266.html>by Kazi
> Anwarul Masud on 9/1/2011
>
> 7. CAN FOSSILISED IDEOLOGY DERAIL BANGLADESH'S
> DEVELOPMENT?<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers43/paper4215.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 7/12/2010
>
> 8. OPPOSITION SMEARING BANGLADESH'S CROWNING
> GLORY<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers42/paper4141.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 2/11/2010
>
> 9. CHINA'S RAILWAY LINK-UP WITH CHITTAGONG VIA
> MYANMAR<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers42/paper4103.html>by
> B.Raman on 18/10/2010
>
> 10. BANGLADESH: FEEL FOR THE STONES WHEN CROSSING THE
> RIVER<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers41/paper4056.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 22/9/2010
>
> 11. *INDIA-BANGLADESH EMBARK ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP -
> SILENTLY*<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers41/paper4032.html>by
> Rajeev Sharma on 11/9/2010
>
> 12. CONSOLIDATING
> BANGLADESH<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers40/paper3987.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 19/8/2010
>
> 13. SOUTH ASIAN STAKE IN GLOBAL
> CONSTRUCT:<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers40/paper3959.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 31/7/2010
>
> 14. ANATOMY OF BANGLADESH OPPOSITION: SK. HASINA MUST
> ACT<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers39/paper3867.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 19/6/2010
>
> 15. CHINESE INTEREST IN HAMBANTOTA, CHITTAGONG PORTS --- AN
> UPDATE<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers39/paper3863.html>by
> B.Raman on 16/6/2010
>
> 16. BANGLADESH ON A STRATEGIC
> TIGHTROPE<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers38/paper3796.html>by
> Col. R. Hariharan on 5/5/2010
>
> 17. IS COEXISTENCE WITH RADICALIZED ISLAM
> POSSIBLE?<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers38/paper3748.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 5/4/2010
>
> 18. BANGLADESH ECONOMY- PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS- PART
> II<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers38/paper3735.html>by Kazi
> Anwarul Masud on 27/3/2010
>
> 19. BANGLADESH ECONOMY- PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS- PART
> I<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers38/paper3734.html>by Kazi
> Anwarul Masud on 27/3/2010
>
> 20. BANGLADESH AND SHOCK
> DOCTRINE<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers38/paper3718.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 14/3/2010
>
> 21. INDO-BANGLA RELATIONS IN THE NEW GLOBAL
> CONSTRUCT<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers37/paper3663.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 13/2/2010
>
> 22. INDIA & BANGLADESH-SECURITY RELATED
> ISSUES:<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers37/paper3652.html>by
> B.Raman on 6/2/2010
>
> 23. CAN INDIA AND BANGLADESH CREATE A
> WIN-WIN<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers37/paper3647.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 4/2/2010
>
> 24. SHEIKH HASINA VISITS INDIA - A VIEW FROM
> DHAKA<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers37/paper3629.html>by Kazi
> Anwarul Masud on 27/1/2010
>
> 25. INDIA AND BANGLADESH MUST COME
> TOGETHER<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers36/paper3592.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 6/1/2010
>
> 26. TERRORISM IN BANGLADESH - MONSTER CHILD OF BNP -
> JAMAAT<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers36/paper3509.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 17/11/2009
>
> 27. PRO-POOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND GLOBAL
> SECURITY<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers35/paper3420.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 17/9/2009
>
> 28. BANGLADESH, INDIA AND THE GLOBAL
> CONSTRUCT<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers34/paper3396.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 6/9/2009
>
> 29. BANGLADESH: SITTING ON HISTORY'S
> EDGE<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers34/paper3386.html>by
> Bhaskar Roy on 3/9/2009
>
> 30. BANGLADESH ECONOMY IN GLOBAL
> MELTDOWN<http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers34/paper3383.html>by
> Kazi Anwarul Masud on 2/9/2009
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:58:10 +0600
> Subject: India wants total surrender
> From: bdmailer@...
> To:
>
> India wants total surrender
>
> by Zana Ghutekurani in FaceBook
>
> Bhaskar Roy doesn't understand why the people of Bangladesh are not happy
> with India, though he praises Bangladesh Awami League and Mujib.
>
> In his article Eurasia Review he says : "In 1971, the most common words on
> the lips of a common Indian was "Joi Bangla", victory to Bangladesh. The
> India-Bangladesh honeymoon lasted till August 15, 1975, the day Sk. Mujibur
> Rahman was assassinated" …. that one night India-Bangladesh relations went
> into a tail spin".
>
> He asks, "Should religion divide Bangladesh and India? If that were so, then
> East Pakistan would not have broken away from West Pakistan to liberate
> itself. Language, culture, tradition, blood and history proved much stronger
> than religion. India has around 18 per cent Muslims and Bangladesh has
> around 14 per cent Hindus".
>
> Why Mr Roy informed 14% Bangladeshis are Hindus I do not know. Did he make
> mistake? or over the years the population of Hindu migration into Bangladesh
> increased, or they have plan to migrate ? Let me not become paranoid now
> before reading the whole article.
>
> Though Mr Roy gave us wrong data, this is not my problem, the problem is his
> claim "Language, culture, tradition, blood and history proved much stronger
> than religion" which sounded very contradictory to me. Because:
>
> 1. Urdu was created inside India, yet did not get place.
>
> 2. People of Bangladesh, who are Muslims and mixed have blood connection
> with Afghanis, Middle Eastern gene pole (Muslims are not restricted to
> marrying within castes).
>
> 3. Traditional (e.g.,celebrating EID, Shab-e-Batar) similarities with other
> Muslim countries. 4. Bangladeshis have clearly afghan and middle eastern
> influenced eating habits (Polaw,Firni, use of various spices, Halwva etc).
>
> 4. Along with many other ancestors (e,g., adivasi tribes ) Bangladeshis have
> blood connection with Afghan, Persia and other Middle Eastern countries. The
> blood connection also connects them with Muslims in India and also in
> Pakistan apart from religion.
>
> 5. The most striking difference is suggested by History which suggest that
> there were a clear difference between East Bengal and West Bengal even
> before the arrival of the Muslims.
>
> Therefore, when Mr Roy tells, "Historically, in the region of greater India
> that is Bangladesh there was hardly any religious conflict to talk about
> between the two communities" I did not have anything to say, as he
> completely forgot to mention all the conflicts and the struggles that the
> people of this part were having and how they were subjected to change
> themselves to adjust with the minority.
>
> But things did not stop here , he surprised me while advises "it would be
> wise for today's politicians like Begum Khaleda Zia to heed the advice of
> these roving philosophers of yester years if they really want peace and
> development."
>
> When the/a Roy tells about the development of Bangladesh, it may scare our
> people as probably people will not be able to trust it. The article itself
> contains the main reasons. One obvious reason is that Mr Roy's inability to
> understand the reasons behind the dissatisfaction of the people of
> Bangladesh.
> Later he accuses two political parties of this country, BNP and Jamaat for
> harbouring "visceral hate-India mindset" because "After all, they were
> committed to Pakistan and remain so" . Especially he deliberately accuses
> Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI) and its allied religious groups.
>
> I have no information on if Jamaat and other Islamic parties expressed its
> hatred towards India, but, if anyone criticise Indian aggression and actions
> towards its neighbouring countries and if this is interpreted as "visceral
> hate-India mindset" I question the objective of such articles.
>
> Mr Roy keeps on saying, "In the early part of this decade the JEI leaders
> appeared to have been confident to form the government in Dhaka on their own
> by 2012. They also spoke of making Bangladesh a confederate of Pakistan." At
> this point it seems he is scared of a Bangladeshi Party in Bangladesh for
> its work inside Bangladesh. I wonder why is that?
>
> The second political party he accuses is BNP. "But what is Begum Khaleda
> Zia's enduring problem with India?", he asks . "Her late husband President
> Zia-ur-Rehman was a liberation war hero and fought along with Indian
> soldiers. But why did he turn against India so viciously? He even banned
> "Rabindra Sangeet, songs written by Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagore. But
> he stopped short of changing the Tagore Song "Amar Shonar Bangla" which
> Bangladesh adopted as its national anthem after liberation. Today, Tagore is
> more alive in Bangladesh than even in India, clearly underlining how strong
> culture can be as a cohesive bond surmounting religious barriers."
>
> Again , I am not sure if Mr and Mrs Zia ever expressed their "visceral
> hate-India mindset" and banned "Rabindra Sangeet? Neither I realised why he
> was advocating for Tagore written national anthem which was written 100
> years ago when the condition of the subcontinent was completely different.
> Then he keeps going on, "But she has always suggested by her behaviour and
> policy a deep emotional link with Pakistan". Yes , Mr Roy mentions current
> Pakistan's 13 times, expressed his enormous "visceral hate-Pakistan
> mindset". Completely forgot that in 1947, the people of east Bengal
> constituted Pakistan willingly along with other present Pakistani provinces.
> He was completely oblivion of the fact that the present day Pakistan was a
> part of British India, quite a big number of its population migrated from
> present India too. If he could not forget expressing his hatred to formation
> of Pakistan , if India could not remove its animosity towards its own people
> for choosing and wanting to build a nation and harbour their "visceral
> hate-Pak mindset", how can how can they expect others to love them?
>
> The article is a packed with wrong information, hatred towards Pakistan,
> hatred towards the muslims, accusation towards two political parties
> supported by many Bangladeshi people, alluring people towards development,
> and showing Bangladeshis the "only way" of development is to suck up India,
> preparing people not to change national anthem, accusing people for their
> personal choice (liking or disliking India) and of course trying to make
> people grateful towards India for the distress caused during 71.
>
> To read the article of Roy:
> http://www.facebook.com/l/WAQDkmBh4AQD8uK3HWFAFc48rm4q1eXJVsQnOMJVTdglXkA/www.eurasiareview.com/can-india-find-a-way-to-bangladesh%25E2%2580%2599s-heart-analysis-20072011/
>
> Please note, the writer Mr Roy writes for SAAG. SAAG is the South Asia
> Analysis Group, a non-profit, non-commercial think tank. It says "The
> objective of SAAG is to advance strategic analysis and contribute to the
> expansion of knowledge of Indian and International security and promote
> public understanding", in other words to influence and change opinion of
> people according to their goal. In other words this is part of Indian
> Intelligence.
>
> Personally it is hard for me to hate anyone though I get annoyed by these
> types of works. In Bangladesh I have seen many writers are feeding people
> with their garbage works. And exploiting peoples' trust to satisfy I request
> those pretending "atel" garbage writers to grow some social responsibility
> and not to engage in exploiting peoples' trust.
>
> My words will not stop people from working in ignorance, rage, anger, envy ,
> jealousy or even in exchange of tangible interests , but nothing wrong in
> asking for being sensitive and accept those people who are different and
> bear their difference.
>
> I also request people from remain alert and aware about the activities of
> those organisations, such as, SAAG. This is an example of how India keeps
> its eyes on other countries and influence.
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[ALOCHONA] Why we have to confined in a 55000 square mile?

If B.D. was prosperous country and fencing herself to stop illegal aliens entering from neighboring countries looking for jobs, wouldn't it have been other way around?
So work to advance BD instead of being a Cry Baby ...!
--------

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, "ezajur" <Ezajur@...> wrote:
>
> The dream of an undivided India was a glorious one. But it is a finished dream.
>
> That's why India wants to build a barbed wire fence along its entire border with Bangladesh and I have read that Burma wants the same.
>
> We Bongus consider it a privilege that everyone wants a fence around us :)
>
> --- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Banglar Bhuiyan <banglar_12_bhuiyan@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Sirs,
> > The following news attract our attention. Why we have to confined in a 55000 square mile ? Why there shall be any border between Bangladesh India and Burma ?
> > Let us merge with India including Burma a huge land....But birth Control is Haram.
> > The devastated wrong was done in 1947....one India solution is was the best solution.
> >  
> > Another wrong was done in 1971 why we separated from west Pakistan a 5 times bigger land East Pakistan (Bangladesh).
> >  
> > Let us go for one Greater India solution. Muslim will not observe any birth Control.
> >  
> > Thanks
> >  
> > Banglar12Bhuiyan
> >  
> > জনসংখ্যা নিয়ন্ত্রণে আইনজীবীদের অনশন
> > স্টাফ করেসপন্ডেন্ট
> > বাংলানিউজটà§&lsqauo;য়েন্টিফà§&lsqauo;র.কম
> >
> > ঢাকা: দেশের জনসংখ্যা নিয়ন্ত্রণে কার্যকর পদক্ষেপের দাবিতে প্রতিকী অনশন পালন করেছেন সুপ্রিমকà§&lsqauo;র্ট আইনজীবীরা।
> >
> > বুধবার সকাল সাড়ে ৯টা থেকে দেশের সর্বোচ্চ আদালত সুপ্রিমকà§&lsqauo;র্ট প্রাঙ্গণে এ কার্যক্রম শুরু হয়।
> >
> > অনশনে আইনজীবীরা বলেন, জনসংখ্যা বৃদ্ধিকে দেশের এক নম্বর সমস্যা হিসেবে চিহ্নিত করতে গড়িমশি করছে সরকার।
> >
> > আইনজীবীদের দাবি, মাত্র ৫৫ হাজার বর্গমাইল আয়তনের এ দেশে জনবিষ্ফà§&lsqauo;রণ ঠেকানà§&lsqauo; না গেলে তার পরিণতি হবে ভয়াবহ।
> >
> > অনশনের আয়à§&lsqauo;জক কমিটির অন্যতম উদ্যà§&lsqauo;ক্তা ব্যারিস্টার মুকসেদুল ইসলাম বলেন, ‘সরকারের দৃষ্টি আকর্ষণের জন্যই আমরা এ উদ্যà§&lsqauo;গ নিয়েছে। এর আগে বিষয়টি দেশের সর্বোচ্চ আদালতেà¦" উত্তাপন করা হয়েছিলà§&lsqauo;।’
> >
> > তিনি আরà¦" বলেন, ‘জনসংখ্যা এ দেশের প্রধান সমস্যা হলেà¦" এর জন্য কà§&lsqauo;ন আলাদা মন্ত্রণালয় নেই। শুধু জনসংখ্যা অধিদপ্তর দিয়ে এ বিষ্ফà§&lsqauo;রণ নিয়ন্ত্রণ সম্ভব নয়। তাই আমরা এ প্রতিকী অনশন করছি। পরবর্তীতে আরà¦" কর্মসূচি পালন করব।’
> >
> > বাংলাদেশ সময়: ১০১৩ ঘণ্টা, জুলাই ২০, ২০১১
> >
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/