__._,_.___
Mr.Jiten Roy,
I was really shocked to hear the verdict on Golam Azan as he is the mastermind behind all organized killing and bangaleee annihilations done in 1971. He was given 90 years jail instead of capital punishment , with preference to his older ages. In 1971, we were attacked by Golam Azam's gangs who believe in Islam and we were then protected by the same community in 1971. Problem lies with the teaching of religion. That is why I mentioned some name of person bearing the same community who really showed us human behaviour as I behave to human beings in every time.
We got our independence with a short period of time. After liberation , allies of Golam Azam were given protection by the freedom fighters, either from the blood relation or in exchange of material benefit. And at the same time , Tajuddin , second in command of Bangabandhu was politically kept inactive. Tajuddin, if in active in politics, can align party with a secular characteristics. Party did not take proper measure to abolish culturally communal forces inside the party and some acts of party instead helped them to flourish. I know Awami league internally, when Awamai league in power , two will be given preferences, one is Madrasha and another one is army. And end result of Madrasha is to strengthen the hand of Jamat or Hepajot. Awami league will not get single vote from them. Mosque and Military have no good example for our secular politics.
Please read the link:
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=13&dd=2013-07-19&ni=142816
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=13&dd=2013-07-20&ni=142952
http://www.dailyjanakantha.com/news_view.php?nc=16&dd=2013-07-21&ni=143075
All problems lies with the hypocrisy of Awami league leadership. This is the dual nature of Awami league's leadership to dig their own graves many times in history. Personally I know them that some of my friends know me. I might not be good narrator so you and some readers might be confused. I believe in compassion and loving kindness and try to defend truth in every time without considering colours, race and religions. I am not coward , and only coward can hide their own name and only clandestine mindset can have doubt to others.
Intellect without wisdom is curse.
Best regards to you.
Asoke Bose
You should read your first post and think through how it should be perceived by readers? If I am not mistaken, it felt like you tried to justify Azam's crimes with our politicians' behavior and Taj being sidelined during Mujib's time. In addition, we did not prolong our struggle little longer to get rid of our political weeds? OK, if that was not your intention, that is truly great. Thank you.
So, why talk about the nature of the crimes? How that relates to your first post?
-SD"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss
From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>; "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>; "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 8:22 PM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
Please do not relate crime of Golam Azam and his allies with other criminals as two are opposite in nature. Please try to understand the fundamental differences between these two concept of crimes.Crime of Golam Azam and his followers fall under this category:In 1945, the United States and other Allies developed the Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis and Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), sitting at Nuremberg, which contained the following definition of crimes against humanity in Article 6(c):"Crimes against humanity: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated."Golam Azam and his allies did the above mentioned crimes in 1971.Crime as we are noticing in a society falls under the following category:Legally, crimes usually are defined as acts or omissions forbidden by law that canbe punished by imprisonment and/or fine. Murder, robbery, burglary, rape, drunken driving, child neglect, and failure to pay your taxes all are common examples. This conception of crime explains the wide variety of criminal activity and the factthat individuals tend not to specialize in one type of crime. It also is consistent with thewell-established tendency of people to be consistent over long periods of time in the frequency and severity of crimes they commit. Even executives who commit white collar crimes probably are more impulsive, self-centred, and indifferent to the suffering of others than those who do not take advantage of similar opportunities.N:B: I have source for above mentioned writings.Asoke
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com; khabor@yahoogroups.com
CC: akhtarudduza@gmail.com; srbanunz@gmail.com; bangladesh-progressives@googlegroups.com
From: shahdeeldar@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:13:44 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
Point taken and yet, I think you should not justify Ghulam Azam's criminality because Awamis and BNP cadres have been behaving very poorly. The old habit would not go away that easily. Even, a prolonged struggle would not have created a perfect harmonious society as evidenced by other countries' freedom struggles. That is a pure illusion. We have a religious fault line that has been apparent for long time and it is not going to go away any time soon. If that was not there, people would have invented something different like Shia-Sunni problem. That is our damn nature!-SD"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss
From: Asoke Bose <anjbose@hotmail.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>; "khabor@yahoogroups.com" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "akhtarudduza@gmail.com" <akhtarudduza@gmail.com>; Shafikur <srbanunz@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
I appreciate all of our respected friends who had given valued comments regarding my notorious caption. My caption has explanatory sign and in my comments I mentioned under Golam Azam's guidance, Pakistani army launched genocide against us in 1971. I lost my brother for this cause. In no way I do not expect Golam Azam, for his age consideration got special preference from judiciary.I do not want my reader's confusion with regard to my caption and in no way I can give a praiseworthy applause from my heart to Golam Azam ,a notorious culprits in our time.Regards to all.Asoke Bose
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
CC: bangladesh-progressives@googlegroups.com
From: shahdeeldar@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 18:41:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
The man is not only misguided but totally demented to justify a massive genocide in the name of pure Muslim blood. No, it was not a racial cleansing, it was a genocide with ethnic cleansing. And, that is considered as a crime against humanity. Can anybody show this @ss the door?
-SD"I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues."
-Seuss
From: Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com>
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Golam Azam did not do wrong in 1971!!
Mr. Bose is severely misguided in his reasoning. I am not sure how he could up with a conclusion that Golam Azam did not do anything wrong even after he has been found guilty of all heinous charges. In my view, Golam Azam is still causing death and destruction every day as people keep on dying on the street in protest of his verdict.I can understand political deal between Awami League and Jamati leaders, which may save some convicted Jamati leaders' lives. What I can't understand is - why all those fools are dying every day on the street, fighting one another. What are they achieving with their ultimate sacrifice? They are saving lives of some convicted killers at the cost of their own lives. Does that make sense to anyone? These are the dumbest fools in the society, always ready to be exploited.
As I understand that we are using free thinking forum where expression will be vibrant and talk will be full of humour or very serious or sarcastic. When we find forceful and tyrannical attitude among us then it is very nice to say the person to use your tyrannical weapon and abolish the free thinker. As we have seen the democracies have long grappled with the issue of the limits, if any, to place on the expression of ideas and beliefs. The dilemma dates back at least to ancient Greece, when the Athenians, who cherished individual freedom, nevertheless prosecuted Socrates for his teachings, claiming that he had corrupted young people and insulted the gods. I am very little in compare to great Socrates.
Quote :"Freedom of speech is the political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's body and property to anyone who is willing to receive them. The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country and the right is commonly subject to limitations, as with libel, slander, obscenity, sedition (including, for example inciting ethnic hatred), copyright violation, revelation of information that is classified or otherwise."