Banner Advertiser

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

[ALOCHONA] BNP body proposes more power for chairperson



BNP body proposes more power for chairperson
Staff Correspondent Courtesy New age 16/11/09 

The opposition BNP's sub-committee on the amendment to the party constitution and the manifesto on Sunday night submitted a 40-point amendment proposal to the standing committee consolidating the authority of the party chairperson.
   The sub-committee convener, Tariqul Islam, also a vice-chairman of the party, at a briefing in the party chairperson's office at Gulshan said they had submitted about 40 amendment proposals to update the constitution in the light of the present-day requirement and 'some bitter experience' of the past.
   The committee members at the briefing declined to detail the proposals. Tariqul only said the ideals and spirit of the constitution would remain unchanged and there would be some addition to some chapters of the constitution.
   Joint secretary general Nazrul Islam Khan said they had proposed not to allow a person to hold more than one post in any tier of the party. The standing committee will evaluate the proposals and they would be placed in the national council session for approval, he said.
   Party insiders said the amendment proposals related to the election of the secretary general
   in the national council session and expansion of the central executive committee.
   Both the chairperson and the secretary general will, according to a proposal, be elected by councillors and both of them will be elected for three years, sources in the committee said.
   The sub-committee has proposed formation of advisory committees at all tiers of the organisation, increasing the number of joint secretaries general to 11 and introducing five more divisional secretaries for women affairs.
   Keeping in mind the October 29, 2007 meeting at the house of the standing committee member Saifur Rahman, the sub-committee proposed a provision that will allow only the chairperson to convene standing committee meetings.
   The proposals include expanding the central executive committee to 351 members from the existing 251 to incorporate more leaders into the central level. All units of the party will have new posts of secretaries for religious affairs, freedom fighters' affairs, human resources affairs, law affairs, and science and technology affairs.
   If members of the party contest in any election in violation of the party decision against candidates nominated by the party, they will be expelled from the party, the proposals said.
   It also made it mandatory for activists to take permission from respective committees for the use of portraits of the party founder, the late president Ziaur Rahman, chairperson Khaleda Zia, and the party's senior joint secretary general Tarique Rahman in posters or leaflets.




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Presidential pardon for Shahadab is abuse of power, say citizens



Presidential pardon for Shahadab is abuse of power, say citizens
Khadimul Islam Courtesy New Age 14/11/09

People of different professions and eminent citizens of the country termed the reported waiving of the sentence of 18 years' imprisonment of an absconder convicted in four corruption cases as naked abuse of power and contradiction of the government's commitment to curb corruption.
   According to reliable reports President Zillur Rahman has waived the sentence of 18 years of imprisonment and financial penalties amounting to about Tk 1.6 crore against Shahadab Akbar, son of deputy leader of the Parliament Syeda Sajeda Chowdhury, who is also a presidium member of the Awami League and an intimate of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
   Shahadab was convicted and sentenced in four corruption cases under different Sections of the Anti-Corruption Commission Act in 2008 during the interim government's rule. He was sentenced when he was absconding and he is still a fugitive.
   Citizens alleged that the President had 'abused' power and was guilty of 'political nepotism' as Sajeda is very close to him.
   Eminent citizens said it was a decision made purely on political considerations.
   They also said that the waiving of the sentence of a corrupt person has exposed the Awami League's hypocrisy in terms of its electoral pledge to curb corruption.
   'We have heard of presidential clemency only in cases of capital punishment, but using presidential power to save a corrupt man from legal consequences is something unheard of,' M Mukhlesur Rahman, a psychologist of the Modern Psychiatric Hospital, told New Age on Friday. He said that corruption would not be reduced in the country if such things go on happening.
   Mohsin Uddin, a businessman at Bashundhara Shopping Centre, said, 'It was nothing but abuse of the power of the Awami League. After ensuring that corruption cases against its own leaders are dropped, the government has now started waiving the sentences of convicts.'
   'I do not have any information of a previous precedent of presidential pardon for a person convicted of corruption. If they (present and previous Presidents) did it, they abused their power and betrayed the people who are aspiring to free our society of corruption,' said Masudur Rahman, a teacher of a college in the city.
   Akbar Ali Khan, former adviser to the caretaker government, and Professor Muzaffer Ahmad, member of the Board of Trustees of Transparency International Bangladesh, said that the President himself would not have taken such the decision of waiving Shahadab's sentence unless the Prime Minister had asked him to do so.
   According to Article 48(3) of the Constitution the President in all his functions, save only that of appointing the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice, shall act in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister.
   Article 49 of the Constitution says, 'The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites and to remit, suspend or commute any sentence passed by any court, tribunal or other authority.'
   Both the eminent citizens of the country mentioned above observed that the process was undertaken very secretly and it would be wise to disclose the process to the people.
   'As everyone is equal before the law, what will the government do if other corrupt persons, who were convicted in similar cases, apply for waiver of sentences?' asked Muzaffer.
   Many distinguished citizens said that a very bad precedent had been set, as it would increase corruption by people with powerful connections.
   The Awami League in its election manifesto said that elimination of corruption was one of its five priority issues. 'Multi-pronged measures to fight corruption will be put in place. Powerful people will have to submit wealth statements annually. Strict measures will be taken to eliminate bribery, extortion, rent seeking and corruption. Strong measures will be taken against those having unearned and black money, and against loan defaulters, tender manipulators and users
   of muscle power at every level of the state and society,' pledged the manifesto.

 




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Govt to withdraw 293 more political cases mostly against AL men



Govt to withdraw 293 more political cases mostly against AL men
Courtesy New Age 13/11/09

The government on Thursday decided to withdraw 293 more 'politically-motivated cases' mostly against members of the ruling Awami League.
   The decision came at the ninth meeting of the national review committee on withdrawal of politically-motivated cases at the home affairs ministry with state minister for law Quamrul Islam in the chair.
   The meeting did not recommend withdrawal of any such cases against leaders of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party-led alliance.
   'A total of 293 cases out of 659 placed at the meeting have been recommended for withdrawal. Of them, 21 cases were filed by the Anti-Corruption Commission and the rest 272 were under the penal code.' Quamrul, also the head of the review committee, told reporters after the meeting.
   He said the committee did not receive any appeals from the BNP-led four party alliance for review on the day.
   Replying to a query, the head of the review committee said the government would also consider withdrawal of harassment cases against the leaders and activists of the BNP-led alliance.
   'We may get appeals from some leaders of the opposition party for withdrawal in the coming meeting. We will recommend for quashing the cases against the opposition leaders also if those are found to have been filed for harassments,' he added.
   The committee has so far recommended withdrawal of a total of 1,183 cases filed by the Anti-Corruption Commission and under the Bangladesh Penal Code, mostly against AL leaders and activists and only two filed against the BNP leaders.
   The meeting recommended quashing of cases against Khulna mayor Talukder Abdul Khaleque, Kamal Ahmed Majumder, Haji Selim, Salman F Rahman, Mizanul Haque, Manikganj municipality mayor Ramzan Ali and Tongi municipality mayor Azmat Ullah among others.
   The committee at the previous meeting on October 13 recommended dropping 297 cases filed with political intension including one against senior joint secretary general of BNP and former premier Khaleda Zia's eldest son Tarique Rahman.
   Earlier the sixth meeting had decided to drop a liquor case against BNP's central leader and former law minister Moudud Ahmed.
   The committee is reviewing the 'harassment cases' filed during the tenures of the BNP-led alliance government (2001-06) and the immediate past interim administration of Fakhruddin (2007-08).
   BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia and her two sons—Tarique Rahman and Arafat Rahman—filed applications on April 30 seeking withdrawal of all 20 cases lodged against them during the interim government's rule.
   The government on February 17 set up the inter-ministry committee to review the 'politically motivated' cases, especially those filed against politicians, during the regimes of the BNP-led alliance government and the interim administration.
   The national committee has so far received 5,132 cases recommended for withdrawal by the district committees from across the country.
   The ultimate fate of the ACC cases recommended for withdrawal was depending on the Anti-Corruption Commission, Quamrul said, adding that the recommendations were sent to the ACC and also to the courts concerned for their considerations.
   He said the review committee would conclude its job by January 2010.




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] MPs to get 10pc quota in admissions to public schools



MPs to get 10pc quota in admissions to public schools
Siddiqur Rahman Khan Courtesy New Age 6/11/09 

The government is thinking about reserving 10 per cent of the seats in all government secondary schools for children of the choice of lawmakers, education ministry officials told New Age on Thursday.
   'Almost all the lawmakers receive requests from various quarters for admission to government schools every year, but neither heads of the schools nor education directorate officials heed their requests. The ministry is preparing an admission policy which will have a provision of reserving 10 per cent of the seats in every school for the children chosen by local lawmakers,' said an official of the ministry.
   'As local peoples' representatives, we face requests for admission every year, but we fail to do anything in this regard. The officials involved in the admission process act according to their will,' said a lawmaker who is also a member of the parliamentary standing committee on the education ministry.
   'Keeping 10 per cent or more seats reserved for lawmakers' chosen children has also been discussed in the parliamentary standing committee's meeting held in late September and October. We are preparing the admission policy in light of discussions of the standing committee,' he said.
   Since 2001 a committee headed by the director-general of the Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education has been assigned to complete the admission process for the 24 schools located in the capital. In other places the admission committees are headed by the deputy commissioners.
   'According to the proposed admission policy the admission committees will henceforth be headed by regional education officers instead of DCs,' said the official.
   There are now 317 government secondary schools in only 191 upazilas across the country.
   'By November 15 the admission policy will be completed and the schedule of selling admission forms and holding exams will be announced immediately after that,' said an official of the DSHE.
   In Dhaka there are only 8,000 seats in different classes in 24 public schools, but as many as 45,000 students take part in admission tests every year.




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Titumir - a freedom fighter



Titumir (Syed Nesar Ali Titumir) who fought for the right of ordinary people died because of the deception of rich hindus. Krishnodeb Roy, a jaminder with his people in kolkata burned a Masjid while people were doing their Friday prayer. The police didn't take any action against Roy. Roy attacked muslims twice and allured English to attack Titumir's force. When the English commander Colonel Stuart aksed Ramchandra to tell Titumir 'Tell Titumir, to surrender as I have come from lord Bentinck'. Instead Ramchandra conveyed to Titumir 'You are doing the right thing by fighting against company. Now hold your sword'. Titumir replied ' I haven't fought against the English. I am fighting against the jaminders'. Ramchandra told colonel Stuart 'Titumir says, he won't surrender. He will fight back.' As a result the English crashed the Titumir force heavily and fifty of the Titumir's followers including Titumir himself died in 1831, Nov 19th. We salute this freedom fighter who fought against the injustice.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] RE: [khabor.com] Re: Re: Bangladesh/Failed/State



Saif, Mujib didn't remove Muslim from Awami League, it was Bhashani who removed Muslim. You know what is your problem - your problem is to give credit to Mujib for everything, even if it requires you to distort the history. It wasn't sauds or Islamists who killed Mujib, it was a joint effort of RAW and secularist forces of Bangladesh who killed Mujib. Do you see Islamic lifestyle in any of the killers of Mujib? The killers belong to inner circles of Mujib himself.

--- On Wed, 11/18/09, SAIF Davdas <islam1234@msn.com> wrote:

From: SAIF Davdas <islam1234@msn.com>
Subject: RE: [khabor.com] Re: Re: Bangladesh/Failed/State
To: "Khabor" <khabor@yahoogroups.com>, mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, "Nizam" <nzh.biman@gmail.com>, "Nizam" <nizam_moer@sky.com>, "asghar" <msa7011@yahoo.com>, "Farid" <akhtergolam@gmail.com>, "Alamgir" <malamgir1@aol.com>, "Shamim" <veirsmill@yahoo.com>, turkman@sbcglobal.net, "Tasneem" <tasneembr11@yahoo.com>, "kamal" <kamal4000@yahoo.com>, "Dr Khalida" <drkbegum2021@yahoo.com>, "onasis" <cdm@dhaka.net>, "jiban" <imrulalqays@gmail.com>, "Ashraf" <syguia@aol.com>, "MOZUMDER" <mozumder@aol.com>, "Mushtaq" <mushtaq1@msn.com>, "ulfat" <ukabir@hotmail.com>, "Munir" <captmunir@gmail.com>, "M. A Solaiman" <abusol123@hotmail.com>, "Mir" <jjmchowdhury@optonline.net>, "SULTAN" <rascx@yahoo.com>, "Jashim" <jashimuddin@comcast.net>, "SajjadBhai" <sajjad.rahman@acdi-cida.gc.ca>, "Shomee" <samireaz@hotmail.com>, kaljatri@emailme.net, "Ajmol ali" <ajmol.ali@treas.state.nj.us>, "anis90" <anis90242@yahoo.com>, "lal" <lalhgehi@yahoo.com>, "afsarbhai" <afsar_hossainbd@yahoo.com>, "Kazi Masud x ambassador" <kamasud@dhaka.net>, "khurshid" <mirza.syed@gmail.com>, "banglanari" <banglarnari@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 3:26 PM



Jamil Saheb>

Fact:   Mujib removed the word 'Muslim' from Awami Muslim League thereby giving it a secular character in 1949. Fact:  Six points was all about economic exploitation of East Pakistan by West Pakistan, nothing to do with religion. Mujib was a Nationalist. Islam rejects ideology of nationalism. When Mujib took power he immediately introduced secularism as a state principle. That hurt the feelings of Muslim majority in Bangladesh and the Muslim world at large--particularly the house of Sauds. Had Mujib declared Bangladesh a Muslim country, he would probably have been alive today. To understand this mind set one must study the history of Islam in the Indian Subcontinent. The defeated soldiers of Allah got the opportunity of life time when the brain-dead secular forces of scientific socialism unknowingly gave the opportunity to unite and overthrow the Mujib government. Zia changed the constitution by way of Fifth Amendment—established the rule of Allah---destroyed secular ideals and helped in establishing the Communal Republic of Bangladesh. Islam was saved from the Kafir and it became the State Ideology. In 1982, a most corrupt individual in the annals of history took power in Bangladesh . This slave of Allah surpassed even Zia in licking the boots of the Islamicists in Bangladesh . By way of 8th amendment he fulfilled the will of Allah and declared Islam the State Religion, thereby guaranteeing for himself 72 virgins in heaven. Have you forgotten what happened to that whiskey sipping madam? Who she went to bed with to become the prime minister? As the saying goes, the rest is history. To be sure, the other lady is no less corrupt. Her shameful record of sleeping with the slaves of Allah is surely turning her deep-at-heart-secular-father turning profusely in the grave.

 
SaifDevdas
islam1234@msn.com

To: khabor@yahoogroups.com
From: kaljatri@emailme.net
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:07:50 +0530
Subject: [khabor.com] Re: Re: Bangladesh/Failed/State

 
WRT: http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/khabor/ message/25278

>Bongobondhoo's cherished dream of building the foundation of the
>nation on the >basis of a secular ideology, has gone up in the smokes.

   Let me give some bitter pills of truth here. As much I share with
   you the concern about "the proliferation of the Islamic extremism
   and fundamentalism" , I disagree that nation based on secular
   ideology was Mujib's cherished dream. Secularism was never a part
   of AL manifesto ever before independence. You will not find it in
   AL's 6 point programme that Mujib had always championed. The
   secularism clause was added by leftist student leaders of DUCSU
   during the student/mass movement prior to March 25, 1971.
   Secularism was a selling point then as both the Hindu and Muslim
   Bengalis had a common enemy in Pakistan. So sure it made political
   sense to Mujib to adopt secularism, although he did not himself
   initiate it nor was it his idea, as I mentioned above. In fact he
   never championed socialism either. Secularism and socialism were
   both imposed on the AL manifesto by the hot blooded leftist
   students. Secularism for them and Mujib was an idea that came from
   political expediency, not from heart. To justify a mass movenemt
   against Pakistan they had to adopt an ideology that went aainst the
   ideology that Pakistan symbolized. Hence secularism and socialism.
   I can bet my last dollar that had Pakistan been a strictly secular
   and a Soviet leaning state and exploited East Pakistan and
   dominated it like it did, then AL's manifesto would have been to
   end the evils of secularism and socialism, restoring the rule of
   Islam and free market. After all Sheikh Mujib was a devout Muslim,
   he always bragged about him being a Muslim and not fearing anyone
   except Allah (He used to state that in rallys to indicate he wasn't
   afraid of Pakistani police crackdown on him/AL). He also used to
   end his affirmations with Insha Allah. AL/Mujib must have felt bad
   for not being able to use Pro islam and pro capitalism slogan as
   thet had already been hijacked by the Pakis!, so they could not use
   those slogand to sell their cause against the Pakis to the mass.
   When the expediency dictates otherwise they will morph and adopt a
   different ideology. No wonder AL's motto now is Allahu Akbar now,
   and not too long ago they had allied with Khilafat Majlish (A much
   more radiacal Islamic group than Jamat). Here are some more bitter
   pills. If you think that Islamization had happened due to Mujib's
   elimination consider the following :

  1. It was Mujib's gov. established Madrasha Board and Islamic
  Foundation, Bangladesh Seerat Mission, allocated land for Tablig
  Jamaat at Tongi, handed over Kakrail Mosque and its adjacent lands
  to Tablig Jamaat and registered three acres of land to Baitul
  Mukarram mosque. (never happened under Pakistan before Bangladesh's
  indpendence)

  2. It was Mujib's gov. who enacted laws banning gambling at racecourse
     and import and sale of liquor. (Prior Pakistan gov never did this)

  3. It was Mujib's gov that aggressively pursued membership in OIC
     to boost it's image as a Muslim nation. He even offered Bhutto(An
     atheist albeit) a red carpet reception in 1974(The then Idina HC in
     Dhaka Subimal Dutta resigned in protest), SO he could get Pakistan's
     recognition, SO he could join OIC, SO he could project BD as a
     Muslim state.

  As J.N. Dixit mentions in his book "Liberation and Beyond" about
     Mujib:
     "He was also clear in his mind that the national identity
     of the newly created Bangladesh can be sustained only if the
     Muslim identity of Bangladesh forms a primary ingredient in
     Bangladeshi nationalism" (Quoted in the New Nation of 25 August
     1999)


Now consider the following about Hasina's AL. (If Hasina could do
these, imagine what Mujib would have done had he been alive today
considering 1-3 above, if he faced the same challenge to stay/grab
power):

  1. She bragged about all that mentioned in 1 above.
  2. After return to power in 1996, Hasina government allocated Tk 33
     crore 9 lakh for religious affairs against Tk 31 crore 35 lakh of
     previous BNP government.

  3. The number of gov enlisted Madrashas increased to 7146 during
     Hasina's Awami League rule from 5977 of BNP times.

  4. It is during the Awami League government that a welfare trust was
     constituted for Imams and Muazzins. Besides, a Madrasha Teachers
     Training Institute was established at Gazipur at a cost of Tk 1.37
     crore.

  5. She allied with Jamat prior to 1996 election to topple Khaleda Zia.
     Even in 1994 Al had accepted Jamat as a legit political group and
     sent AL presidential Noninee Badrul Hasan Choudhury to sit with
     Golam Azam for possible alliance against BNP. Motiur Rahman Nezami
     even apologized to the people in a meeting in Chapai Nababganj for
     having acted in cohort with AL against BNP in the past.
     (Prothom Alo Dec 12 1998) in a mass meeting. All these paved the
     way for and made it legit for BNP to ally with Jamat later in 2000
     election.

  6. She did nothing in 1996-2001 (no sign of doing that now either) to
     reverse the Ershad amendment of constitution declaring Islam as the
     state religion nor the Ershad's introdcution of Friday as a holiday,
     causing huge loss to busineeses dealing with export/import
     (Mounong Shommoti Lokkhonong). Not only that AL now has
    Allahu Akbar  as their motif slogan.


  - Jamil Asgor




Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Re: [khabor.com] Sahara says



YEAH !!!!!!!   SHE IS ABSOLUTELY  RIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Isha Khan <bd_mailer@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Sahara says
 
 




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] FW: A very important write-up of Shah Abdul Hannan in Daily Nayadiganta [1 Attachment]

[Attachment(s) from S A Hannan included below]

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Shakil Abdullah [mailto:shakil_abdullah@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, November 17, 2009 10:20 AM
To: sonarbangladesh; dahuk; bangla ict; banglarnari
Subject: A very important write-up of Shah Abdul Hannan in Daily Nayadiganta

 

Assalamulaikum.

Change is needed in the procedure of Remand. We should not let this sort of oppression to continue in the name of remand. Read a very important article written by Shah Abdul Hannan on this topic. The article was published in Daily Nayadiganta on
16 November 2009. Please see the attached PDF file.

Shakil

 


Attachment(s) from S A Hannan

1 of 1 File(s)


__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Interview: Zafar ul-Islam Khan, President, All-India Muslim Majlis-e Mushawarat






Dr. Zafarul Islam Khan is the President of the All-India Muslim Majlis-e Mushawarat, a platform of several influential Indian Muslim organizations. He is also the editor of the New Delhi-based fortnightly Milli Gazette, one of the few English-language Muslim news magazines in India. In this interview with Mushtaq Ul Haq Ahmad  he talks about terrorism in India, about how the media projects Muslims and what he feels Muslims should do in the current context.

 

 

 

As President of the All India Muslim Majlis-e Mashawarat (AIMMM), what do you think are the problems facing Indian Muslims that need immediate attention?

There are a lot of issues facing Indian Muslims, as depicted earlier by Gopal Singh Committee and now by Sachar Committee report which clearly depicts the Muslims of India as the most marginalized community compared to other communities. Official figures available, portray the Muslim standard graph as the lowest whether in terms of per-capita income, literacy or living standard. There is under-representation of Muslims in all kinds of Government jobs. Prevalence of communal feelings against them is a common problem. There is no magic wand to change this grim situation in a few moments but the main priority as of now that reservations must be extended to Muslims as recommended by Mishra Commission as it is an assured way to fight this discrimination.

 

Regarding the presence of communal feelings against Muslims, were they present before Partition also or are these a post-Partition Phenomenon?

Communal grudges against Muslims were always there but Partition escalated these feelings. Communalists believe and profess Muslims to be aliens, demanding that they must live like guests in India. We reject with contempt this second-class status. We will never accept it because the Constitution of India guarantees us full rights and privileges as any other community. These are communal slogans of some political parties which exploit religion like BJP, and these will die a natural death as they only use them for vote bank politics and will abandon them if they feel that they are counter-productive as was witnessed recently in the case of Varun Gandhi. They used these slogans since late 1980s in Gujarat, Karnataka etc for political ends. This demon of communalism can be tackled by awakening the whole community through education, and economic and political participation.

 

What you say about the media hype of labeling Muslims as "terrorists" after any incident of bomb explosion or terrorist activity?

 

Indian media is manufacturing hate against Muslims on the basis of rumours and baseless reports spread by communal elements. We have just heard about the explosion in Margao, Goa, in which Malgonda Patil, a Sangli-based Sanatan Sanstha  member was killed. He was going to explode bombs on the eve of Diwali and then as usual accuse  Muslims for the same. The Sanathan Sanstha office has been raided by the police and it was found that the place is used for manufacturing bombs. This ground-breaking revelation has been blacked out by the electronic media. The media is concentrating on terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan or the Taliban threat while ignoring these types of real domestic threats. The media kills Muslim stories or buries them somewhere inside where nobody will read them while on the front page they create the myth of Muslim  terrorism. This labeling of Muslims as terrorists got a boost after 9/11 when President George W Bush used the word "Crusade" for his war against Muslims and this western label was lapped up by our journalists here to malign Muslims who have nothing to do with terrorism or Taliban.

 

Do you think that the Indian State is encroaching upon the rights of minorities, be it the 1984 riots against Sikhs, Gujarat riots of 2002 against Muslims, and Orissa riots against Christians in 2008?

Not only these minorities are facing the wrath of the Indian State but many other marginalized communities like Gujjars, Dalits and adivasis are also suffering and we must not be selfish as to speak about our rights only but we all must get together to form a large united front comprising all the deprived communities to fight for our constitutional rights.

 

This means that the Indian State as a whole has failed to live up to the principles enshrined in the Constitution of India be it commitment to Secularism or Protection of Minorities?

 

All the governments that come to power speak beautiful language; they have tried to show their concern for the minorities especially Muslims whether it be the 15-Point Programme of Indira Gandhi or now of Manmohan Singh. This concern is also witnessed by the fact of constituting committees like Gopal Singh in the past and Sachar Committee under the current government to show that the Indian State cares about the marginalized but nothing comes out of these exercises. They are only recommendatory in nature with no or half-hearted efforts for implementation. There is no real wish to implement, the top brass don't want them to be implemented and the benefits are simply not reaching the common people, e.g., scholarships for students are not reaching the deserved and funds for minority development are lapsing back unused to the government.

 

But the present government has constituted a separate ministry for the welfare of minorities?

The Minority Ministry is not an Independent Ministry, it head, in-charge of another ministry, too overburdened to fully discharge his duties as the minister for minorities.

 

How can these problems be tackled and solved?

The schemes and programmes that are meant for minorities aren't fool-proof, with no proper implementation, supervision and follow-up mechanisms. These loopholes must be plugged in, in order to reach a large chunk of deserving masses.

 

Do you think that the government is in fear or resorting to the votebank politics, or majority appeasement when it does not take action against the perpetuators of 1984 and Gujarat riots and Babri Masjid Demolition?

 

The government can do nothing in this regard. The people within the government are the problem. Many of the MPs, ministers, MLAs themselves are perpetuators of these crimes and accused; they would never want to get themselves punished. Lal Krishna Advani, main accused in the Babri Masjid demolition, managed to remove his name from the chargesheet of the accused. Also the CBI is a tool in the hands of the ruling politicians, not an independent body. It is highly politicized and the government doesn't want it to take action in certain serious matters involving politicians or influential wealthy people.

 

Don't you think that we can have hope for a change as the UPA in Centre is not the Right Wing NDA led by BJP?

 

The bureaucracy is infiltrated by the RSS cadres and it remains the same despite the change of regimes, so we can't hope for any breakthrough or miracle happening for Muslims and other minorities and marginalised sections. Even in Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case, which was carried out in Gujarat, the Union Home Ministry in an affidavit stated that Ishrat and three others killed with her were operatives of the Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Toiba which was a lie as we know now. Maintaining that the four were "terrorists," the Union government had told the High Court that "No proposal for CBI investigation is under consideration of the Centre nor does it consider the present case fit for CBI."  So justice was neither done under BJP nor Congress and Muslims continue to be on the receiving end.

 

In these circumstances how will Muslims work for their progress when they have become so disillusioned with the State? Would education and reservation be enough or something different and unique is needed?

We must work hard to built our progress as Japan did after the Second World War and now they are free to create their own army to safeguard their interests. Violence is not the way; we must build ourselves educationally and economically in order to take up our rightful place in the country.

 

Do you think that the disillusionment with justice system, failure to protect minority rights, especially of Muslims by subsequent governments whether it be Batla House encounter or fake encounter killings in Gujarat and Kashmir, isn't it driving Muslims to the wall, where they will dissent and can even resort to violence?

 

Even under worst conditions, Muslims must not resort to violence as it will give free license to security forces to kill us, torture us, intimidate us, raid our houses, offices and working places as well as rape our womenfolk. They really want it, that we get provoked and resort to violence so that they find an excuse to pounce on us. We must opt for the legal procedure which is open to us to fight against discriminations though this route is cumbersome and long but we must not forget that justice is still possible in this country where very high-ranking officials of the State who were guilty of crimes against minorities are now in jails like DG Vanzara of Gujarat. There may be stray cases of violence by Muslims but most of the cases of violence attributed to Muslims are fabricated by security agencies and Police. Even in the case of SIMI which was alleged to be a terrorist organization, the Tribunal set up by the Home Ministry itself declared that it is not a terrorist organization. Despite a lot of provocations, Muslims are maintaining their calm and tranquility and not returning violence by violence.

 

The Hindutva demon is spreading its tentacles in the Indian society but each government seems to protect this demon, be it the Kanpur blast while fabricating boms, or Hyderabad Masjid bombings. Why are they protected and the chapter is closed, while the case with Muslims is different?

 

We will not let this chapter be closed and those wishing to get it closed would not succeed. Communalism is a great threat to our nation and the poison of communalism is spreading in our society. Hindu communalism as well as Muslim communalism is not acceptable. Political parties actively play the communal card to gain votes.

 

A new trend of manufacturing terrorists has cropped up in which Muslim youths, especially the educated ones and techies are apprehended and tortured to make false confessions and then some case is slapped on them and the Police declares that it  has solved the case bringing the alleged culprit to court. How do you see the repercussions of this trend?

 

This simply is a trap to provoke Muslims to resort to violence but they are well aware of these traps and they should always refrain from using violence to achieve even genuine ends.

 

If there is a united political party of Muslims representing all Muslims of India would it help to turn the tables?

 

It is not possible to have a single party representing the Muslims of whole India as Muslims here are diversified and scattered over a vast country except the Valley of Kashmir  where Muslims are in majority. There are around 80 parliamentary constituencies where Muslims are in sizeable numbers in the country. Though there are political parties like the Muslim League in Kerala and some parties have been formed by Muslims in Maharastra, Assam, Uttar Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh etc. If these parties don't fight with each other, they are destined to win in 20-25 constituencies which is a good chunk to ensure a vocal representation in Parliament. Muslims who get elected on other parties' tickets can't raise an independent voice for Muslim causes unlike the freedom enjoyed in Parliament by the likes of Bantawala, Suleman Seth in the past and Asaduddin Owasi of Ittihadul Muslimin at present. They were independent and therefore vocal articulating the real and unbiased demands and grievances of Muslims.

 

Indian Muslims have been too under-represented in the mainstream media. Why is this so?

 

Muslims are not in the mainstream media, though there is now some Muslim representation in the electronic media but same is not the case with print media. Educated Muslim boys and girls must join print media which obviously would help make a change. We should also create our own mainstream media like Muslims in Kerala and now in Karnataka have done. There are four Malayalam daily newspapers brought out by Muslims in Kerala, and they exercise a considerable influence on the local scene. In Karanataka too a Muslim daily has started some years back and it is exercising a healthy influence on the media scene there. Now other newspapers in Kerala generally abstain from publishing concocted stories about Muslims in the state because the very next day these Muslim newspapers reply back by exposing the false claims of biased journalists. This secular media has established a sort of check and balance there and same is being experience now in Karnataka.

 

Why is this contradiction between Muslims of North and South India?

It is because North Indian Muslims have no wish to get into the media. They must shun this attitude and only then they will be able make inroads into the mainstream media. Also, I am a witness to this fact that a rich Muslim businessman wanted to finance a Hindi daily but at the last moment he backed out only because of the fear of being harassed by the state authorities for supporting the truth and as a businessman he didn't want to get into trouble and lose his peace of mind. It is not that Muslims don't have money to support big media houses but they still do not fully realize its importance even as a commercial venture. In north India, we have only Urdu newspapers which are not read by non-Muslims; even our Muslim elite does not read them. So even if some false claims are made about Muslims in the English and Hindi press, the only way that Muslim organizations respond is by publishing counter-claims in the Urdu press which no one but a limited number of Muslims read, and so these responses do not have any impact on our society. 

 

You say that Urdu newspapers are not read by non-Muslims and not even by the Muslim elite. Before Partition it was a common language reinforcing the Hindu-Muslim unity, why this apathy now? Is it due to government policy, Hindu apathy, yellow journalism or something else?

It is a result of government policy after Partition. They tried to kill Urdu in favour of  Hindi, even though it was resolved before Partition that the common language of independent India would be Hindustani written in both Persain and Devangiri scripts. This was forgotten after independence and Hindi in Devnagri script was imposed by brute force. Before Partition many Hindus and Sikhs knew Urdu and even now some of them do exist in places like Delhi and Punjab. Also the lower administrative work was carried out in Urdu in north India but due to the government policy, Urdu was wiped off from its native bastions comprising of Uttar Pradesh, Uttrakhand, Bihar, Punjab and Delhi etc. There is no Urdu-medium government-run school at present in U.P. Now the children of these schools can only speak in Urdu but can't read or write it. Some old newspapers in Urdu are still being published in these states but they have only a small readership and are not able to articulate Muslim interests and help shaping the opinion of the masses with regard to the problems facing Muslims.

 

How much has Milli Gazette been able to fill up this void in the existing Muslim media?

We have been able, to an extent, to fill the vacuum in the field of the Muslim English-language media though it is not a mainstream paper. Our aim when we started MG ten years ago was to publish Muslim news which didn't find space in the mainstream media, as well as to reach non-Muslims and our own elite who now do not read Urdu. We are focusing on issues facing minorities and marginalized sections like Dalits, Christians, Sikhs while concentrating on Muslims who are neglected by the mainstream media. Even if we write a letter to a mainstream paper it is destined to end up in the dustbin. I recognize that at present our paper doesn't fully satisfy the needs of the community. We are still a fortnightly while the situation demands that we become a weekly. We need better quality reports, stories from the field, but we lack the finances needed to do this on a wider scale. Presently, we do not have even a single full-time correspondent outside Delhi because of shortage of funds.

 

 

Regarding social and charity work among Muslims that you are committed to under the banner of Charity Alliance, do you think that Muslim money in the form of Zakat, Sadaqat etc is properly utilized?

First of all I wish to state that Charity Alliance (CA) is not a big organization. It owes its birth to a crisis that suddenly emerged in early in early 2005 in Murshidabad where Muslims were dying in scores daily with no one coming to their rescue. At present, we are offering weekly ration, medical help, school fees and a vocational training centre  there. Last May we have also opened a school in the area of our work in Murshidabad. We are also offering some scholarships to school-level students in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi beside some other small help here and there. We realize that there is need to broaden the scope of CA but for that we need much more funds.

 

Regading the Zakat and its proper utilization, according to a survey we conducted in a Muslim majority area of Delhi we found that ninety percent of Muslims do not pay Zakat and even the small minority that pays doesn't bother to see that it is properly utilized and reaches the categories defined as recipients of Zakat by the Qur'an. So the real purpose of Zakat, ie, alleviation of poverty in the Muslim society, is defeated as it fails to reach the really deserving people while parasites siphon it off leaving the needy high and dry. We are not really able to see the benefits of Zakat in our society. We read in our early Islamic history that a time came when people used to go searching for someone who would accept Zakat. The real purpose of Zakat is that from recepients people should become payers of Zakat.

 

Ulama and madrasas where the age-old traditional Fiqh and jurisprudence are taught, eat away most of Zakat leaving  a little for others. Moreover, they have not been even able to guide the community.

We need madrasas but not so many as we find today. There has been a mushroom growth of these institutions and we need to curtail this trend. There are presently madrasas that exist in name or on paper only but they are the first in the run for this money. There are good madrasas like Deoband, Nadwa, Madrasatul Islam, Jamiatul Falah, Jamia Darussalam, Jamiat ul Salehaat and Sultanul Madaris. They are producing good scholars for the community and we really need them but we don't need one lakh madrasas which are the need of people who have formed them not of the Muslim Ummah.

Also, madrasas should compete for Zakat and Muslims should pay more than Zakat for such purposes of the community. It is not enough to just pay 2.5% of your savings. Any person can spare much more than this for community services. If Bohras and Shia can pay a very hefty amount to their religious heads, why can't Sunni Muslims pay more than their Zakat in order to run their community services. Money from foreign sources should be avoided by madrasas as the foreign donors impose their own conditions. Moreover, since most of such funds come through non-transparent channels, there is lack of accountability which breeds corruption and discontent in the institutions that accept it though even this channel is now drying up.

 

Ulama proclaim that unity is a basic characteristic of this community but the fact is that the Ummah is disunited and the unity is seen only rarely as during the Danish Cartoons, Babri Masjid demolition and Shah Bano case and the Ulama themselves are divided?

Let us start to learn living with differences which we cannot change them. Even the Prophet of Islam said that differences are a blessing for my Ummah. There have been attempts to wipe out these differences like the Ahli Hadith Movement which took this challenge but with the passage of time they themselves became a sect. Yes, it is true that cases concerning all Muslims like Shah Bano and Rushdie unite us for a common cause but these are spontaneous reactions and unity which do not last long.

 

This is a fact that 99% of these Ulama don't come to the rescue of Muslims when in distress, e.g.,  Batla House encounter, countering the myth of Muslim terrorism etc, whereas politicians use them for their own selfish ends..

This is not correct that all Ulama are used by politicians. There is only a minority which is used by politicians and the community doesn't respect them. Important ulama of Deoband and Nadwa do not join politics. The fact is that you cannot stop this trend of ulama joining politics and getting used by politicians as ours is a democracy and a free country where everyone is free to do what he things is good or beneficial to him or her. Ulama should only teach people, offer an exemplary character to become role models for the masses and help in removing the misconceptions about Islam.

 

These traditional Ulama with their rigid outlook have tried by every means to promote their own sects and interpretations of Islam, leading to internecine wars. What is the remedy?

Differences of interpretation would continue but to form violent groups based upon these different readings of Islam is not acceptable in any way. Also, these violent groups in many cases were formed and clandestinely funded by foreign sources, e.g., Jundullah in Lebanon and Iran is a creation of the CIA. Similarly, other violent groups in Saudi Arabia and Iran etc owe their creation to foreign hands. If a country is occupied, like Palestine, Chechnya and Afghanistan, then only armed resistance groups may be formed and that too only to fight for the liberation of the country and not to indulge in sectarian strife or to attack innocent people of whatever religion or sect.

 

The Ulama still deny women the positive role they can play in changing Muslim society. They wish to keep them at bay and continue patriarchal hegemony. Don't you think Islam needs to be liberated from these Ulama?

Ulama opposing women's positive participation within the boundaries laid down by Shari'ah are not speaking for Islam but for their own cultural beliefs or tribal and social norms trying to camouflage these as "Islam". Such attempts to curtail the role of women have developed due to local readings of Islam while ignoring the real and universal Islamic teachings. Who can forget the role of Hazrat Aisha (RA) in Islamic history and her contribution  to Muslim society. Many senior companions of the Prophet (Pbuh) would come seeking her advice in different religious matters. Muslim history is full of examples of women being rulers of great countries like Shajart al-Durr of. Even in the Subcontinent we had reigning queens like Raziya Sultana and Begums of Bhopal and Ulama were never opposed their rule.

 

They have tried to impose what they call Islamic State based on pure theocracy  whether be it Taliban in Afghanistan or Swat, thus paving a way for what Akbar S Ahmad calls as "Clash Of Muslim Inclusivists and Exclusivists".

Muslim Ulama are not in a position to rule anywhere in the world. They are not equipped with the knowledge of ruling as well as they lack the knowledge of present time and the tools needed to rule today. There have been attempts since Syed Ahmad Shaheed to form an Islamic State but they all failed. Even Taliban in Afghanistan were an unsuccessful attempt as their state did not include modern features and failed to make contacts with the outside world. During its whole tenure, it was recognized as a legitimate government by three countries only and all these three states backed out when U.S attacked it. As far as the whole Muslim history is concerned, Ulama always played a secondary role and they never ruled anywhere. In the present times, their madrasas don't equip them with the tools to rule a country. After the end of the colonial era, Ulama tried to lead the masses but all their attempts failed  because their way is rigid -- it is either Halal (permissible) or Haraam (forbidden) in their dictionary, while politics is based on the principles of the possible, of give and take.

 

So do you think that a new leadership is emerging among Muslims?

Ulama have not been able to impose their leadership on Muslim masses, neither have they been able to rule, nor are they suited for political rulership. Yes, a new leadership is emerging in Muslim societies from other sections of the Ummah.

 

Don't you think that the traditional Ulama can still play a significant role by joining hands with Muslim intellectuals and shunning their rigid attitudes?

As I said earlier, we need Ulama, but they must shed their rigid attitudes and emulate  Muhammad Abduh of Egypt who was able to influence Muslim masses unlike his mentor  Jamaluddin Afghani who despite traveling, preaching and inspiring for a change wasn't able to bring a change be it Persia, Egypt, India or Afghanistan. We really need Ulama but they are not suited to become our political leaders, they should limit themselves to guide the rulers and educate the masses.




Mushtaq ul-Haq Ahmad is a student at Kashmir University, Srinagar.



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Sahara says



Sahara says
 
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___