Banner Advertiser

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

[ALOCHONA] Whopping success for Election Commission

Whopping success for EC

8 crore voters already registered, electronic database ready

Courtesy Daily Star 26/6/08

 

The Election Commission (EC) yesterday achieved its target of registering eight crore voters with their photographs taken, within the deadline stipulated by the electoral roadmap, putting to rest all skepticism about the project's success.

The commission also has the electronic database of the eight crore voters ready, which perhaps will be one of the largest electronic databases of electoral rolls in the world while being definitely the largest among developing countries, claimed senior officials engaged in the mammoth project that began in August last year.

A few lakh more voters might still be added to the list by the June 30 deadline for wrapping up the field level work of voter registration, the officials added.

The entries are being checked and re-checked leaving no room for duplication, they noted.

Bangladesh Army has been helping the EC in the project since its inception.

Distribution of national identity cards for the voters, which are being prepared simultaneously with the voter list with photographs, will also be completed by the end of October, sources said.

The number of voters on the current list with photographs is set to drop by at least 1.2 crore compared to the previous list prepared by the immediate past controversial EC led by Justice MA Aziz.

On the previous list, prepared in 2006, the number was 9.30 crore, which was later scrapped due to a large number of duplications and other errors on it, costing the exchequer Tk 60 crore for nothing.

The violent dispute that raged over the 2006 voter list was one of the pivotal reasons for the rather unorthodox changeover of power on 1/11/2007 and the subsequent stalling of the ninth parliamentary election, originally scheduled for January 22 of the same year.

Earlier, between 1994 and 1995 the state lost over Tk 100 crore as the erstwhile EC failed to deliver after it had taken up a project for distributing voter ID cards.

Given the size of the country's population, the current EC earlier estimated that the number of voters would be around eight crore.

Elated by the whopping success, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which has been assisting the EC in the job, is planning to celebrate the achievement at the end of July, sources said.

Chief Adviser Fakhruddin Ahmed, who inaugurated the field level work of voter registration in Rajshahi City Corporation area in August last year, is expected to join the grand celebration as the chief guest.

Civil and military bureaucrats involved in the project, and officials of different foreign missions in Dhaka will also be invited.

According to a progress report prepared by the project headquarters, till June 22 a total of 7.97 crore voters were registered.

The field level work of voter registration is still going on in 41 areas with one lakh voters on an average being registered daily.

"We are sure that eight crore voters have been registered by today. However, we will receive a confirmation report from the field within two or three days," a senior official engaged in voter listing said yesterday.

With the completion of registrations in the remaining 41areas by June 30, the field level work will come to a successful end within the deadline stipulated in the electoral roadmap announced by the EC on July 15 of last year.

The EC launched the highly ambitious project for preparing the national voter list with photographs in an effort to put an end to persistent controversies over voter lists, amid widespread skepticism about its success.

The national voter list with photographs is being prepared by the EC under the auspices of a UNDP project titled 'Preparation of Electoral Roll with Photographs and Facilitating the Issuance of National Identity Cards', to the tune of an estimated Tk 424 crore with

Tk 274 crore of it coming from contributions made by different foreign donor agencies and countries.

Along with the field level voter registration, printing of the voter list is also going on in full swing under active supervision of the army.

Till yesterday, final voter lists for 120 areas including city corporations and upazilas were printed while printing of the final voter lists for 18 other areas is going on.

Draft voter lists for 311 areas out of a total 522 areas were printed till yesterday.

Over 3 crore national identity cards were prepared till yesterday, 1.56 crore of which had already been distributed, officials engaged in the voter listing project said.

 

 

__._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] On U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama

A response to Paul Kokoski vis-à-vis Barack Obama's position on the sanctity of human life

 

A.H. Jaffor Ullah

 

One Mr. Paul Kokoski from Canada had decided to pass his harsh criticism against Senator Barack Obama who in all likelihood would run against Senator McCain on November 4, 2008 for the office of U.S. president.  As per respected poll takers if the election is held today, Barack Obama would handily win the election.  However, the election is about more than four months away and public opinion poll may change against Obama and for that matter Senator McCain's popularity may also plunge by then.

 

Mr. Kokoski is judging Mr. Obama by a single criterion, which I think is very unfair.  A presidential candidate should be judged instead by many criteria.  Lest Mr. Kokoski forgot, a person is not elected to the office of presidency to impose moral authority on the teeming millions.  In America only the hard-core religious people care about the abortion issue.  Even Senator John McCain who claims to be a conservative candidate begs to differ from religious leaders on this issue.  Most Americans would not mind to terminate a pregnancy if the mother's health will be at risk if the pregnancy continues.  Also, in case of incest or genetic abnormality of the unborn child it is humane to terminate the pregnancy. 

 

Mr. Kokoski is confusing the issue of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" as mandated by the United Nations with that of abortion of unborn child.  The UN is concerned about the Human Rights of people who are the citizens of the world.  I don't think the framers of the Human Rights were thinking about the rights of the fetus.

 

When does life start in mother's womb?  At the time when the sperm fertilizes the egg?  Who has the moral authority to give a verdict on it?  We very much live in a Darwinian world.  A fetus that has genetic defect would abort naturally.  Shall we blame God for the demise of the fetus?  We hardly could do that.

 

My request to Mr. Kokoski is a simple one.  Please judge any presidential candidate by his or her overall political, social, and economical agenda and platform.  It is a complex world we live in; therefore, the litmus test for the fitness of a candidate should never rest on one single criterion. 

 

If the religious folks of America make the abortion the single most issue, they won't be able to vote for Obama or McCain.  I don't know in what world Mr. Kokoski lives.  When our orb is mired in various confounding issues, is not it to ask Senator Obama or Senator McCain what kind of world they are dreaming for if they are elected to occupy the White House.  After all, the position is too powerful.  We all have witnessed in the last 7 years how one elected person has taken the entire nation to war on flimsy ground.  This is no time to argue whether McCain or Obama would help enact a law that would ban abortion in America.  Instead, let us worry about the wellbeing of folks who are living and not worry about the unborn.   

 

----------------------

 

New From Bangladesh had posted Paul Kokoski's write-up on June 26, 2008 as follows:

 

On U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama


Friday June 20 2008 17:27:51 PM BDT


Paul Kokoski, Canada


I have enclosed the following letter for publication. Please let me know if you intend on printing it. Thank you.

U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama likes to be, and often is, compared to the late Martin Luther King Jr. He talks much of the struggle for freedom and human dignity. Unlike Martin Luther King Jr., however, Obama fails to recognize and fully appreciate the bedrock principle of human rights - that great "promissory note" of freedom which guarantees the right to life. I refer especially to the principle enshrined in the United Nations'' Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person." I believe this is hypocrisy asking to be elected.

Obama, in fact, vigorously opposes the right to life. In 2002, as an Illinois legislator, Obama supported infanticide by vetoing the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, which would have protected babies who were accidentally born alive during attempts to abort them." The first thing I''d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act," he told Planned Parenthood last July. This would make the United States the most pro-abortion nation in the world.

At a recent town hall meeting he claimed that if his own daughters made a "mistake" and became pregnant he wouldn't want them "punished with a baby." Can anyone trust a president who views the gift of human life as a punishment?

Obama also fully supports homosexuality which thwarts the natural generation of life and which is the anti-thesis of the family.

Obama is a false prophet who preaches "change" and "hope" while pursuing a culture of death. The 20th century has witnessed many such initially charismatic leaders in Germany, the Soviet Union, and elsewhere, who promised change but who delivered nothing but unimaginable horror. Let us make sure this does not happen in America. Though the slogan "change" is usually invoked to signify something positive, in this case it hides a different agenda - one which is very dangerous for America and the world.

Paul Kokoski.
Hamilton, Ontario. Canada
E Mail : pkokoski@mountaincable.net
 

    

__._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Nuclear bondage

 
The US-India treaty handcuffs Manmohan Singh's government by Anand Kumar  25 Jun 08 (http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1280&Itemid=31)
Soaring inflation and differences among political allies over the nuclear pact between India and the United States are threatening to derail the minority government led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, with a clutch of unwieldy minority parties seeking to accomplish their own ends at the government's expense. There have been widespread reports in the media of threats by Manmohan Singh to resign over the issue.
Last year the treaty was put on the back burner when it threatened the survival of the ruling United Progressive Alliance government, whose biggest component is the Congress Party, with 145 members of 545 in the Lok Sabha, or parliament. But now India's government is being forced by circumstances to act whether it wants to or not.
Rising global energy prices are a major factor, along India's twin deficits. Inflation peaked at 11 percent last week and is projected to remain at 9.8 percent for the year before falling back to about 5 percent in 2009. In addition to rising fuel subsidies, the government, with an economy racing along at a 7.5 percent annual gross domestic product increase, is faced with fertilizer subsidies, rising civil service pay, farm loan waivers and falling tax revenues which would raise the fiscal deficit to an alarming 6.1 percent of gross domestic product if hidden off-budget items are included. The high energy prices are expected to triple the current account deficit to 3 percent, raising the spectre of a depreciating rupee.
The rising crude prices are forcing the government to look beyond hydrocarbons as energy sources. With nuclear the other option, agreement with the US is crucial because it gives India access to civilian nuclear technology even though it has not signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, which is necessary to secure the supply of nuclear fuel to India's existing nuclear reactors. Australia recently refused to supply uranium to India as it is not a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty.
Manmohan Singh is seeking to finalize an India-specific safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), so that the US can follow up by approaching the Nuclear Supplier Group, which has 45 members, not all of whom look favorably on the agreement. Countries like China may also oppose it if there is significant opposition in NSG. Then there is the question of whether the lame-duck administration can push the pact through Congress before President George W Bush's term ends in January.
Ironically, Manmohan Singh is facing his most serious difficulty from his own supporters, leftist parties including the Communist Party of India and the Communist Party (Marxist), along with the Revolutionary Socialist Party and the Forward Bloc. They are adamant that the government back away from the agreement, saying it is an excuse to forge a closer "Indo-US strategic alliance." They also allege that the spectre of a uranium shortage was created by the Congress government in a bid to force through the pact and are demanding that the government instead make progress on the Iran–Pakistan–India (IPI) pipeline to solve India's energy crisis.
The leftist parties have been surviving on anti-US rhetoric since their ideology was discredited due to the disintegration of the Soviet Union, China has been another model but to their discomfort the Chinese have diluted their ideology and opted for a modified version of capitalism. In this situation, Indian communists have been hoping to survive on their anti-US stance. But the nuclear agreement would take even that away from them, making it difficult to indulge in anti-US rhetoric if the government supported by them signs an agreement that leads to a deepening Indo-US strategic alliance.
The alliance partners are also concerned about Muslim voters, saying the nuclear pact with the US would alienate Muslims. Strong Muslim aversion became apparent when the Indian Union Muslims League (IUML), a major ally of the Congress in Kerala, threatened to quit the coalition if the government went ahead with the agreement. Muslims League leader Panakkad Shihab Thangal said the party would reconsider its support of the central government and withdraw the Minister of State for External Affairs E. Ahamed, from the council of ministers. Nationalist Congress Party MP Tariq Anwar has also stated that "Muslims in the country do not want a deal with [US President George W] Bush."
The leftist parties have warned the Samajwadi Party, with 39 members in the Lok Sabha, of a Muslim backlash if it supports the nuclear deal. The Congress party has been sending feelers to Samajwadi to support the government in the event that the leftist parties withdraw their support. Samajwadi, however, is keeping its cards close to its chest.
The soaring inflation, the result of skyrocketing global food prices as well as energy concerns, is another worry, restricting the possibility of any political heroics on the nuclear issue. Past experience has shown that voters have shown little mercy to governments which have failed to control prices.
No party except for the opposition Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, which led the government from 1998 to 2004, wants to risk an election. The dominant view in Congress, headed by Sonia Gandhi, is for the nuclear pact, but their leaders are worried that the issue may not have the votes and they are unwilling to sacrifice the government and go to the electorate with inflation at a 13-year high. The leftist parties are adamant, however, saying they might even seek help from the BJP to pull down the government if it takes steps to ratify the pact.
In India, coalition governments have been the norm since 1996 and are likely to be so in foreseeable future, with the concept of national parties seriously eroded in the last few years. Major parties including Congress and the BJP must depend on smaller regional parties to form governments. This culture of coalition has also evolved several trouble-shooting mechanisms, with leaders like Pranab Mukherjee and George Fernandes enjoying reputations as trouble-shooters. This time the Congress government and the leftist parties are looking to the Tamil Nadu chief minister M Karunanidhi and head of the regional Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Party to mediate the impasse.
The Congress is also trying to appease the leftist parties by hinting it will start negotiations on the IPI pipeline. Other leaders of the alliance including Lalu Prasad and Ram Vilas Paswan have offered guarantees that if the leftists allow the government to go to the IAEA, they will ensure that the pact will not go further. Earlier the Congress government refused to give a similar written guarantee saying that it would damage the government's reputation internationally.
Manmohan Singh knows that time is running out. He wants to give President Bush a clear assurance when he meets with him in Japan during the G-8 summit from July 7 to 9. Both governments want to complete the deal so that it can be cited as an important achievement of their respective regimes.
Manmohan Singh has been constrained on several economic issues by the leftist parties, leading to complaints that he was more effective in his role as finance minister from 1991 to 1996 than as prime minister. Singh now does not want an important foreign policy achievement of his regime to go waste.
The alliance in any case will be facing elections in six states in November. Things are not likely to change significantly by then. In all probability the results of that election will be repeated in April next year when general elections are likely if the Congress government manages to complete its full term. What is stopping Congress from going for ratification is the lure of staying in power for another six months. Congress's decision to sign IAEA agreement may annoy the leftist parties, but after the general elections if the members of the present UPA coalition are in a position to form a government, the leftists will have no option but to support them. Moreover, it is also possible that the leftist parties may not withdraw support as elections at this juncture would only benefit the BJP. Whether Congress is willing to put its foot down this time remains to be seen.

__._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Suggestion on the exit strategy for the CTG & Military

WHAT EXIT STRATEGY SHOULD BE FOR THE C.T.G. & MILITARY?
Army backed CTG assumed power a year and a half ago while a general election was promised to be held within two years. It seems that the CTG has kept its promise and is trying to meet the originally promised milestone for election. However, it is observed that both the army and CTG are facing a host of problems in making the election happen in due time. Various political parties are buzzing differently. Some of them declared the election boycotts, some of them are putting hard and fast conditions, and some of them are asking to release their favorite people who are now under government custody for the charges of monetary corruptions. Grabbing political power by the military of the country is the highest form of political corruption. But the most arrogant behavior of the incumbent administration, the most dubious activities of the President, and the most destructive activities of the opposition compelled the highest fire-power of the country to step in to stop all those nonsense activities and save the people of the country from the extreme violence orchestrated by the so called politicians of both major parties. After taking over the administrative power, both the CTG and the military, made a lot of mistakes one after the other. One dreadful mistake was lingering the monetary corruption drive for too long time without starting immediate due process for trial and punishment. Monetary corruptions are criminal offenses that had to be tried promptly by the law of the court, and move on. This is haunting this government severely. How come so many people are imprisoned without convicting any of the corrupted politicians? The government is releasing these corrupted politicians now without any legal due processes. So, what does that mean? Are they all innocent? If so, why they were in prison in the first place? If they were guilty, they must be punished. But why they are being released if they were suspected to be guilty when they were arrested? Does it mean that this government is whimsical? Where did the law and fairness go? All the mistakes done by the government have eroded the high praise that they won by significantly improving the law and order situation of the country.
No one in the world is without any errors, and not everybody has the utmost efficiency in their jobs. While the CTG and Army had no previous experience of running a country, they are expected to make some mistakes, but that should not let the sky fall. Solutions have to be searched by the government as well as everybody else in the country. It is the duty of all citizens of the country to try to help the government whatever way they can, and the government should make the environment such that people can interact with the government facing no troubles. Otherwise, a peaceful transition of power won't happen.
The present government is composed of two components, a civil CTG and an armed Military. Army came to power in the form of physical takeover, just short of declaring Martial Law. Improving the Law and order situation throughout the country is real praiseworthy. The country must have, for all times, this type of excellent law and order situation, no matter, who rules or what type of government runs the country. If the government can not provide law and order, everything of the country falls into the puddle. Until RAB was formed, the street thugs, hoodlums, private tax collectors, robbers, and illegal arm bearers would reign the entire country, bypassing the government. Sometimes these bad elements would even have the influence on the government and the government would have to favor them. That situation has been tackled wisely by the present government and so the people of the country started liking this government quite well. However, the CTG or the Army can not rule the country for too long time. But it is also true that the people of this country have not seen this sort of peace in law and order for the past several decades. Should people give it away soon? I don't think anybody would like to do it. So, what is the solution that this present government should look for such that a peaceful transfer of power would happen and the similar law and order, as we have today, will continue in the future days also?
 
It is real hard to find out any real and practical solution to keep peace as well as to get the democracy back. However, we need to make transition, and we must keep peace in the country by maintaining the law and order situation. How it can be achieved?
The existing political parties have already shown that they are extremely party aligned and the party leaders are not open enough to cooperate with the other parties. It has been seen in the past that the political parties are after their part interests only and not for the benefit of the people of the country. In this situation, if those old parties come to power again, definitely there will be no peace. In order to establish the legacy of the lasting peace in the country, there has to have some other ways, and some other means that the present government has to follow during the power transfer.
Government should form search committees, commissions, and enlightened groups to look for various options how the democracy can be established and the law and order can be maintained unconditionally. We lost already a lot of lives, properties, economic progress, fames, and fortunes because of the chaos, conflicts, and lawlessness in the country for quite a long time. Let's not repeat those unfortunate happenings in our country again. Reconciliation, Unity, Mutual Understanding, Ethics, Respect for Law, and to avoid all anarchism for ever can bring the country together towards a lasting peace. The traditional democracy is good where society is bonded and do not erupt suddenly with tiny bit of sparks hitting somewhere in the country. Bangladesh is still far away from reaching to that state. A lot of cultural and social traditions and bindings make that to happen. We need some time to learn those things.
Reforming the administrative structure of the government is necessary to be able to perform good governance for the country. One suggestion would be to modify the administrative structure of the government from one layer to three different layers. If the multi-layer government could be instituted, it would be very beneficial for the general public in order to be able to provide public administration services effectively creating a check and balance amongst the layers.
The first layer shall be county level, second layer shall be the district level, and the third level shall be the federal level for the entire country. Each level shall have the fully independent government, not being the part of the other levels. All districts shall be divided into four, five or six counties. Thereby the whole country would be divided into about 250 to 300 counties. Set up a local government for each county. This local County Government shall be responsible for all local administrations such as local legislative houses, local administrative boards, police, court, schools, land record and revenue, real estate development and zoning, taxation, business licensing and controls, roads, bridges, and other development works, hospitals, transportation, safety, security, public welfare, child protection, social work, industry, fishery, animal husbandry, agricultural, forestry, mining, water, electricity, gas, and other supplies, etc. All elementary, middle, and high schools in the county shall be run with the personal property taxes and other taxes collected form the county including the grants from the district government and federal government. All other components of the county government shall be run by the tax collected from the residents and businesses of that county plus the district and federal government grants and aids.
Let the District Administrations have the coordination, training and supervisory duties to look after the county administrations. District administrative employees shall be highly trained and well rounded professionals but the District Government shall be lean, less people but highly efficient at work with impressive compensation. The District Government shall have the administrative council and legislative bodies including the counterparts of each of the departments of the counties. Only at times of need they should deploy their respective teams to help the counties, should any need or crises arise. District administration should be able to collect moderate amount of tax from the incomes of the citizens and businesses in the district. Districts may set up model institutes, extra-ordinary schools and colleges. The universities shall be run by the districts. Inter-county commerce shall be controlled by the district. Districts shall build all transportation and communication highways, railways, airports, river and water development projects, research institutes, large scale hospitals, highway traffic police, district courts, district prisons, utility oversight boards, regulatory bodies, parks, museums, zoos, etc.
The federal government shall be the ultimate administrative, legislative, and regulatory body in the country. The administrative head may be a president or a prime minister based on whether parliamentary or presidential democracy is chosen by the people of the country. It can be decided by the polls or primary elections. Federal Government shall be in charge of key issues of the nation such as Military, Money, Foreign Policy, Inter-District and Foreign Commerce, National Affairs & Policies, Drug and Gangs Control, National Safety-Security-Homeland Protection, Industry Regulation, Financial & Market Economy Safeguarding, Deregulating and Privatizing Public Utilities, Foreign Aid Collection-Distribution-Payment, National highways & Transportation, and establishing Counterpart Departments to train and provide supports to the same in the district governments and in the county governments. Two tier legislative houses (upper & lower) would prepare laws of the country.
Why should we have this three tier governments in lieu of the present on tier Government of Bangladesh? The main reason is the focus of the government. It is always better to be the master of a trade instead of being the jack of all trades. When a one tier government takes care of all affairs in a nation, none of the affairs can be taken care of well. It puts the government into the situation of the jack of all trades. If the government has three tiers/layers then each layer can focus on the issues differently. The local government can take care of all peoples' affairs in its own territory such as public protection, law & order, schools, real estates, businesses, banking, transports, roads & highways, agriculture, industry, markets, health, hospitals, child welfare, land, forestry, fishery, animal husbandry, minerals, mining, and so on and so forth. When area becomes smaller, most people know each other. Almost everyone knows who is a good person and who is a bad person. With this public knowledge, people can elect or select good people in the politics and administration. Bad, greedy, thugs, and cheats can be stopped this way to take the advantage of coming into politics and ruining the political environment. While public is administered by all these local county governments, the district and federal government can focus on support and policy making jobs. Since the district and federal government will not directly handle the real estates, properties, industries, and public directly, it will provide them an opportunity to be less greedy for real estates, properties, bribes, and hoarding. Also, the law & order and public protection services will be provided by the local government and so the district and federal government won't have to spend too much time on these crucial issues which will provide a very good opportunity to spend more time on researching and making public policies for the national stability and upliftment. The federal government will also get more opportunity to interact with the foreign government and international institutions such as IMF, World Bank, UNO, and other international organizations. This will greatly facilitate the federal government in bringing more international helps to build and progress the nation.
Aside from governance, this three tier government system in the country will provide a great opportunity to the people of the country to run the country with less dependence and helps from the politicians. It has been seen in the past that the election and politics in the third world countries in Asia and Africa has become the means of grabbing the state power and hoarding the wealth of the nation. When politicians fail, military takes over, and do the same thing. So, it is necessary to reduce the dependence of the public on the politicians and on the military of the country for public administration. A one tier government grabs all affairs of the administration in the country and so leaves no alternatives to public other than fully to depend on who grabbed the power (politicians or military). Alternatively, in the three tier/layer government, the local county government is composed of mainly the locally known famous persons regardless of their political affiliations. Military take over of the local government is highly unlikely mainly because the military always belongs to the central government and at the time of national crises, military takes over the central government. If t three tier governments exist, even if the military takes over, the local government must remain functional and the military won't have enough manpower and resources to replace all the local civil governments to local military governments. So, even in the event of military takeover, all public will be basically administering the local county civil governments. This will affect very less the public and business lives of the country. Country will remain lot more stable as far as the public lives, economic and business operations. Moreover, a head of the county can be elected by the local people of the county who will better know who is a good leader, good social worker, honest, and basically a good person, no matter what party he/she is in or even an independent person. This way if the county people locally employ 250 to 300 county heads (with designation such as administrator, supervisor, chairman, president or CEO) in the entire country and they are given the status of being the member of parliament then this group of county administrators initially can engage into discussions with the present CTG and military rulers to formulate a permanent settlement on the transfer of power of the federal government to a settled civilian federal government.
If this power transfer job is handled by the political parties only, definitely there will be a lot of games on muscle, greed, power grabbing strategies, chaos, confusions, and it is feared that the pre one eleven situation will come back again to the country. This must be avoided al all costs by all patriotic honest people of the country. Only the dishonest traitors, cheaters, hoarders, and musclemen will be benefited by the repetition of the situation of pre-one eleven. The old politicians are all corrupt, dubious, inefficient, greedy, and outrageously dishonest. It is only hope that the new politicians out of new blood will emerge in future in the country to take the country into the right direction but it will definitely not happen if the pre-one eleven situation comes back in the country.
So, the suggestion to the CTG and the Military Government leaders to think about and form this three tier/layer government in the country before transferring the power to any other government. Elections did never solve our national problems, and will never do it unless it is done properly in a proper environment. Definitely elections will be needed for us to assume the democratic government but the situation of Bangladesh is at present in such a condition that a mere election will not resolve our acute national strife.
We must first put the nation in order. Create appropriate situation which I believe can be achieved by establishing this three tier government in the country now, leaving behind all other national power transfer activities. It is almost guaranteed that if it is not done today, it will never be done by the other governments in future mainly for the reason that the present condition of Bangladesh will not support or give birth to selfless politicians, rather will all be corrupt. The corrupt politicians will not adopt the three tier/layer government because it will stop them from looting and hoarding the state money and properties and will not provide the scope of reigning with their own gang of terrors and tax collectors (chadabuz). A country like ours must avoid going down the spirals of these unfortunate pitfalls for ever. It must be stopped somewhere and try to re-run with fairness, honesty and aptitude. The political bullies keep the good and honest people to take part in administration of the country politically or otherwise. So, if their scope of capitalizing the political muscle in public administration, they will try to adjust themselves also.
So, let us try establish these institutions for the good governance of the country before any other changes.
Let the public administration be run by these local governments for a test period of two, three or five years to see how effectively they are running the administration. In the mean time let all these 250 to 300 honest and independent county heads attend the temporary parliament and give their consensus on future national adoptions, policies and changes for the country; and see where they can take us. We have seen the politicians for long time; let us give chance to the independents to give a test run for the bright and stable future of our country.


__._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] Poetry Festival Held in Queens, NY

 

Tenth Anniversary of the Magazine

 

The Third Shabdaguchha Poetry Festival Held in Astoria, Queens

 

On June 14, 2008,  the Third Shabdaguchha Poetry Festival along with a Multilingual Book Fair, arranged by the International Poetry Journal, Shabdaguchha, marking the tenth anniversary of the magazine was held at PS 114, Astoria, Queens. The Book Fair opened at 1PM and the Festival started at 2:30 PM. Lighting a candle, Rafiq Azad, one of the leading poets of Bangladesh who was visiting  New York as the guest of honor of the event, announced the opening of the festival. Stanley H. Barkan, poet and publisher from Merrick, NY, Carolyne Wright, poet and translator from Seattle, WA, Charles Fishman, poet and the editor of New Work Review, Syed Mohammed Ullah, editor of the first weekly Bangla Paper in NY, and Hassanal Abdullah, editor of Shabdaguchha and convener of the event joined Rafiq Azad  on the day. In his opening speech, Mr. Azad welcomed everyone to the festival by saying that it was not easy for a little magazine to continue for ten years without the hard work and dedication of the editor. He thanks the editor "for building a bridge that brought the poets of the East and the West together on platform," and expressed his hope that this process would continue.

            Stanley H. Barkan, followed with his speech alluding to the various achievements of Shabdaguchha for the last ten years. He went on to say, "The tenth anniversary issue of Shabdaguchha is a milestone of the history of poetry. Shabdaguchha is a bridge across the wide waters, from Barisal to Briarwood and beyond, from Woodhaven to the world, as well as across the large divide between man's basest instincts and his higher civilizing vision." In the seminar on Contemporary Bengali Poetry, Prof. Nicholas Birns, the keynote speaker of the seminar and the guest editor of the translated issue (#39), read a few poems from the issue and discussed the richness of those poems. He said, "Although there was great modern poetry in, say, Arabic (Taha Hussein, Khalil Gibran) and Urdu (Mohammed Iqbal), there was not an organized 'modernism' in the Arab world or in the rest of British-ruled India as there was in Bengal. This makes Bangladeshi postmodernism different from poetry written in Middle Eastern or South Asian in a postmodern time." Charles Fishman also read a few poems from the issue (#39) and offered his opinion on those poems by saying, "These poems are related to me. I hope I would be able to read more of them in translation." Carolyne Wright—who was called an "American-Bengali"  by the editor of Shabdaguchha,  since she is not only fluent in speaking Bengali, but also has a deep understanding of the Bengali culture—read a few poems in her own translations from the Bengali women poets. Minakshi Datta and Naznin Seamon recited from Budhadeva Bose's poetry. Leigh Harrison offered a love song along with the sweet and persuasive musical notes of her guitar. Julio Marzán, the Poet Laureate of Queens, Robert Dunn, editor of Asbestos, Tushar Gayen, a Bengali postmodernist, Yuyutsu RD Sharma, visiting poet from Nepal, Maria Lisella, honorable mention of the Poet Laureate of Queens 2007, Laura Zelasnic, Manhattan Neighborhood Radio host of Words on Wings, Kenol Anglade, computer teacher at Washington Irving High School, and Jean Jocelyn, a visiting poet from Haiti, were among the other poets who read from their work during the festival.

            Two book launching events were also held at the festival: The first, Love Environment and Other Difficultie, a translation of Rafiq Azad's poetry. This part of the program was moderated by Shameem Chawdhury, a Voice of America radio journalist who traveled from Washington, DC for the festival. Syed Muhammed Ullah, Shah Fazle Rabbi, and Shameed Chawdhury participated in the discussion session along with the poet Rafiq Azad. Lutfunnahar Lata recited two poems of Mr. Azad's in Bengali.   

The second book, Majestic Nights: Love Poems of Bengali Women (White Pine Press, 2008), translated with a foreword by Carolyne Wright. Hassanal Abdullah, Rafiq Azad, and Shameem Chawdhury participated in the discussion along with the translator. Soud Choudhury and Mujub bin Haq offered two separate recitals with their groups: Sharfuzzaman Mukul, Shubra Goswami, Sroboni Roy, Mumu Answari, Samonti Wahed, and Golam Mostafa  recited poems from 18th century–20th century Bengali poets.

            Rafiq Azad and Stanley H. Barkan respectively presented the Plaque and a $200 check to Naznin Seamon, the winner of the Shabdaguchha Award 2007.  The legendary singer of Bangladesh Rathindranath Roy performed near the end, which was followed by Mutallib Biswas, Nadia Ahmedm,  and Tasneem Kazi. Nadim Ahmed accompanied them with the  tabla.

Cross-cultural Communications, Lebu-bhai Foundation, Mukto-mona, Shabdaguchha Press, and Bud Publication took part in the Book Fair. A special festival tee-shirt was designed by Shahed with the map of Bangladesh and the following lines of poetry taken from Breath of Bengal by Hassanal Abdullah, translated by Nazrul Islam Naz(Cross-Cultural Communications, 2000):

 

Bangladesh, take note of it

I will rest my head upon your breast

And sleep all night in tranquility

If I just have a little cash.

 

            The first, second and the third place winner of the children's art contest were Ornab, Sabrina, and Ekok. The judges of the event were Clare Saviola, Aka Babul, and Tushar Gayen.

            The festival and the book fair ended at 10 PM. The program was moderated by Hassanal Abdullah and Clare Saviola.

 

Note: Shabdaguchha is grateful to ATN Bangla TV (Bangladesh), NTV (Bangladesh), Weekly Banglee (NY), Weekly Bangla Patrika (NY), Weekly Dashi Talk (NY), Weekly Aknon Somoy (NY), and Mukto-mona.com (Webzine, NY)  for carrying the news right after the festival.

 

 

Shabdaguchha

 

              

 
______________________________________________________________________
Shabdaguchha
85-22 85th Street
Woodhaven, NY 11421
USA
Web site: http://members.aol.com/shabdaweb

and

http://memebers.aol.com/hassanalabdullah





__._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Rounaq Jahan: Challenges, Risks, and Obligations for Women in 2008

 

What Are the Challenges, Risks, and Obligations for Women in 2008 and Beyond?"

by Rounaq Jahan '68, PhD '70

Dr. Jahan's  address to the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study on receipt of the Graduate Society Award June 6, 2008

http://www.radcliffe.edu/alumnae/radday2008_jahan.aspx

 

 

Photo by Tony Rinaldo

 

Rounaq Jahan AM '68, PhD '70 is a senior research scholar and an adjunct professor of international affairs at the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. She divides her time between the United States and Bangladesh. She is the director of research initiatives in Bangladesh and a convener of Bangladesh Health Watch. Jahan has led the life of an academic activist, linking research with policy advocacy and civic activism. Among her many books are Bangladesh: Promise and Performance; The Elusive Agenda: Mainstreaming Women in Development; Bangladesh Politic; and Pakistan: Failure in National Integration. She has also written numerous articles published in edited books and academic journals. Jahan has been a professor of political science at Dhaka University in Bangladesh and served in an advisory capacity on several policy-making bodies established by the government of Bangladesh. She founded Women for Women, one of the first feminist research centers in Bangladesh, in 1973, and she was a representative of Bangladesh to the United Nations General Assembly in 1977. Jahan headed women's programs at the International Labour organization in Geneva and the UN Asia Pacific Development Centre in Kuala Lumpur. She has been a consultant to many international organizations, including the United Nations, the Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation. She also serves on the Board of Human Rights Watch, Asia. Jahan graduated from Dhaka University in Bangladesh in 1963 and received her MA and PhD in political science from Harvard University in 1968 and 1970, respectively.

 

 

I am deeply honored to receive the Graduate Society Award from the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. My memories of Harvard as a graduate student living in the all-women dormitory at 6 Ash Street, the Cronkite Graduate Center, from 1965 to 1969 are full of joy, exhilaration, and great expectations. It was not easy for me to get adjusted to Harvard or living in the United States. Though I was fluent in reading and writing in English, I had never spoken the language before I came to the US. Further, I was raised in a gender-segregated Muslim society leading a very protected and sheltered life. So there were challenges. However, soon after I arrived, I was given a friendly advice that here you either "sink or swim." Since I had no intention of sinking, I suppose, I quickly learned how to swim. But I think it's not simply the fear of sinking but something more positive that propelled me to swim. I liked and enjoyed the stimulating academic environment of Harvard, class lectures given by the outstanding faculty, and discussions with fellow students. I was completely immersed in a life of books and ideas. For the first time in my life, I was encouraged to speak up and debate in the class and outside. Harvard demanded intellectual rigor and, at the same time, provided a supportive environment for me to achieve that goal of excellence. I owe an immense debt of gratitude to Harvard for my intellectual and personal growth.  

 

The world has changed tremendously and particularly the lives of women have changed significantly since I was a graduate student in the mid-1960s. In the last 40 years, in the United States as well as in countries around the world, gender gaps in education, employment, income, decision making, and even in political leadership have been narrowed. In many countries, including the US, women now outnumber men in schools and colleges. They have a significant presence in many fields; e.g., science, medicine, business, and law, which in the 1960s used to be heavily dominated by men. Women's labor-force participation has also become near equal. Marriage and family patterns have changed enabling women to have greater voice within the household, which had traditionally been a major site of women's exploitation. We have traveled far but we still face many challenges, some old and some new.  

 

So what are the challenges? I will focus on four which are old, but they still continue to challenge women. Our first challenge is to shape our own identity, to be our own person and not be defined by others. This is not always easy, as our families and societies are constantly telling us who we should be. But from my own experiences, I know that when we stand firm on what we want to be, we can break many barriers. When I began my academic-activist life in my country Bangladesh in the early 1970s, I used to stand out as a young, single woman pursuing a path very different from other women. What I find remarkable is how quickly our society changed. Change happened because I was not alone; many other women also decided to fulfill their own potentials.  

 

Of course, we have to recognize that achieving our own personal goals cannot be our only challenge. We need to confront the challenges that condition the lives of the vast majority of the world's women. We need to focus specifically on areas where progress for women has been relatively slow in the last 30, 40 years. Our second challenge is then to improve the terms and conditions of women's work, both paid and unpaid. We all know that women's employment rates have increased significantly in the last 40 years, but women's share of earned income has not been at par with their employment. For example, at present in the US, women constitute nearly half (46 percent) of the labor force, but their share of earned income is about two-thirds that of men's. It is even lower in India, which is less than one-third. A part of the problem is that the conditions of poverty have pushed women to take any employment, no matter how poor the terms and conditions. This has resulted in women being predominantly concentrated in low-paid, insecure, casual jobs. For example, in Bangladesh, men dominated manufacturing jobs in the 1970s. Now the situation has reversed where young women make up a majority of the industrial workforce. Further, 80 percent to 90 percent of the workers of the garment industry are young women. This industry, which constitutes Bangladesh's main exports, annually earns 9 billion dollars, whereas these women workers earn less than a dollar a day while putting in 12–14 hours. However, Bangladesh is not unique. The economic boom of many countries is dependent on women's cheap labor. Additionally, the burden of unpaid work in the care economy (i.e., child care, care of the sick and elderly family members) continues to be a problem for women as they expand their participation in paid employment. Getting governments and the private sector to recognize women's contribution to economic growth, their poor work conditions, and their labor in the care economy remains a major challenge for women in the future.  

 

Our third challenge is to reduce violence against women. We have succeeded in making violence against women, particularly domestic violence, a criminal offense in many countries. But this has not resulted in any significant reduction on the incidence of violence. Even in a country such as Sweden, which generally ranks number one in the global women's empowerment index, police reports of assaults on women have increased by 40 percent during the 1990s (from 14,000 in 1990 to 22,400 in 2003). What is worse, war and political and ethnic conflicts have routinely embraced violence against women as a part of their arsenal. In recent years we have witnessed rape being used as a weapon in war and conflict situations in Asia, Africa, as well as Europe.  

 

Our final challenge, and here we have near stagnation, is to improve women's presence in political leadership positions. With the exception of Nordic countries, where women have made significant progress; in the rest of the world progress has been extremely slow. For example, in Sweden, women constitute 47 percent of parliament and 52 percent of ministerial level positions. In contrast, in the USA, women hold 16 percent of Congressional seats and 14 percent of ministerial positions. In India, which has been a model for a long-standing stable democracy among the Southern countries, the progress of women is even slower, though a woman prime minister has governed India for more than a decade (1966–1977; 1980–1984). In India, women's share of parliamentary seats is 9 percent and ministerial positions are 3 percent.

 

However we cannot effectively address these challenges without recognizing the emerging threats/risks for women's empowerment. I will now turn to the risks for women. I will be selective and focus on four major risks. The first risk is the global trend of cutting back on the role of government and the public sector and relying more and more on the market and the private sector; which can adversely affect women's—and particularly poor women's—health and education. From our past experiences, we know that government laws and policies have played a critical role in improving women's conditions. Nordic women are doing better compared to women of other regions mainly because Nordic governments have been proactive. Their equality laws, women-friendly social policies, 40/60 principle of political representation, and public sector provisioning of health and education have contributed significantly in pushing Nordic countries to the top of the women's empowerment index.  

 

The second risk for women is the persistent and alarmingly widening inequalities between different groups of women, which has held back our overall progress and created obstacles in building a strong and cohesive political voice. The gains women have made in the last 40–50 years have not been equitably shared. Class, race, place of residence have been major markers of disparities. Let me give a few examples of these disparities: Lifetime chances of dying from maternal deaths are 1 in 2,500 in USA and Europe, 1 in 94 in Asia, and 1 in 16 in sub-Saharan Africa. However, there are not only North-South disparities, but also great disparities within countries. In India, less than half (43 percent) of births are attended by skilled personnel, compared to near universal attendance (99 percent) in USA. But disparities within India are greater than that between India and USA. Only 16 percent of the poorest families compared to 84 percent of the richest families in India have skilled birth attendance. Within USA also, black women (7.5 percent) have double the rate of unemployment compared to white women (4 percent). If we want to sustain our progress, we need to work towards reducing these disparities.  

 

The third and related risk for women is the narrow constituency base of the women's movements. Women's movements around the world have played a key role in mobilizing women to demand their rights and pressurize governments to enact laws, adopt policies, and take specific actions. But the constituency bases of these movements in most countries have been limited to upper- and middle-class women. Working-class and poor women have generally not been drawn into them. This gap has considerably weakened the capacity of the women's movement to work as a strong unified political force.  

 

The task of widening the constituency base becomes particularly urgent when we consider the fourth risk for women: the backlash from conservative groups, many of whom are religious extremists. These extremists are to be found in all religions: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and Hinduism. In recent years, the resurgence of political use of religion and the political strength of faith-based groups have directly threatened women's rights. For example, the religious extremists in the USA are not only limiting women's choice in this country; via the gag rule, they are also threatening the reproductive rights of women globally. The secularists who have been in the forefront championing women's rights are in a much weakened position politically in many countries. The global war on terror has further exacerbated the risks for women by legitimizing the political use of religion and religious groups.  

 

Let me finally turn to women's obligations. Again, I will be selective and highlight four. Our first obligation is to ourselves. As I mentioned earlier, we need to always stand up for our own rights, to be constantly vigilant and ever-ready to defend and promote our rights.  

 

Our second obligation is to assist other women who are less privileged and resourced than us in our own countries as well as globally. We may all have our own paid and unpaid work responsibilities. But we still need to volunteer time for civic and political actions that address the issues of inequities and exclusion. I became involved in the women's movement in the 1970s, when I realized that I could no longer be a silent witness to the plight of thousands of women who were raped during our war of national liberation and were socially stigmatized and abandoned by their families.  

 

Our third obligation is to recognize the critical role that education has played in fueling women's progress. This is more crucial for us who had the privilege of receiving an excellent education. Evidence from all over the world indicates that women's education has been good not only for women; it has also led to family well-being and economic growth. But millions of girls and women around the world are still denied access to education, particularly quality education. Girls account for more than half of the 57 million children who are out of school. We and institutions such as Radcliffe and Harvard need to move beyond simple knowledge generation. We have to get involved in quiet initiatives as well as public campaigns to ensure that quality education becomes available to all of the world's citizens.   

 

Finally, we need imagination to create a vision of a society, economy, polity, and world order that will be equal, just, and inclusive; and we need to be in the forefront and provide leadership to a shared struggle of women and men to reach that vision. We need stamina and courage, but above all, we need to be committed and have faith in our own strength to transform the world.

 

__._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___