Banner Advertiser

Friday, January 4, 2013

[mukto-mona] Gang rape in Delhi.Listen from Damini's friend



http://www.real-timenews.com//newsdetail/detail/8/8/56932

দিল্লি গণধর্ষণ
images

'ও তখন রক্তে ভাসছে, আর তর্কে ব্যস্ত পুলিশ'

ঘটনার দুদিন পর থেকেই প্রতিবাদে মুখর হতে শুরু করেছিল গোটা শহরটা। ধীরে ধীরে তাদের গর্জনে শুধু রাজধানী দিল্লি নয়, কেঁপে উঠেছিল গোটা দেশ। কিন্তু মাত্র ৪৮ ঘণ্টা আগে ওই শহরটাই কী অসীম উদাসীনতায় চোখ ফিরিয়ে নিয়েছিল রাস্তার ধারে পড়ে থাকা রক্তাক্ত, নগ্ন দুই তরুণ-তরুণীর দিক থেকে! . . . বিস্তারিত

ওমরা পালনে মক্কায় দিলীপ কুমার

পবিত্র ওমরা হজ পালনে স্ত্রী সায়রা বানুকে নিয়ে মক্কায় পৌঁছেছেন বলিউডের প্রবীণ অভিনেতা দিলীপ কুমার। বুধবার রাতে রিয়াদ বিমা . . . বিস্তারিত






__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Questions of God and Eternity



My statement was: Newton built the first reflecting telescope. The statement is still valid. 
I will still stick to my conclusion. Creative geniuses like Kalidas, 
Newton, Ramanujan, and Jagadish Bose were believers, but their achievements had nothing to do with gods or goddesses. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 4, 2013, at 7:41 PM, Kamal Das <kamalctgu@gmail.com> wrote:

 

You did it again, a reflection does not disperse sunlight into its components; refraction through a prism does.

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Newton built the first reflecting telescope. That should have been the sentence. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:01 PM, Kamal Das <kamalctgu@gmail.com> wrote:

 

As usual you are wrong.  Telescope was invented by Galileo, and not Newton.  He decomposed sunlight by passing a beam of it through a prism, and not through a telescope.  Read basic physics again before you write something on it, Mr. Chakrabarty.

For Kalidas, about whose life little is known, it is very likely that his wife, Vidyadharee, came looking for him after she kicked him out of her bed.  He was found sitting on a stone besides the river Ksipra and contemplating suicide,  He misidentified her as the Goddess of learning, which in his days was named Kali/Saraswati.  In the mean time, one shock had opened his poetic nerve in the brain.  However, in the middle of a dark night, only her breasts were visible by the light emitted from her necklace, and he composed, "..Kuchajuga shovita muktahare"


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:23 AM, subimal chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:
 

Jagadish
 Bose wrote an article in 1894 blending science with mythology. In his childhood he asked the Ganges, "River, where are you coming from?" He heard the voice of the Ganges, "From the jataa (interwoven hair) of Mahadev." At the age of 36, he asked the same question and he still heard the same distinct voice of the river Ganges, "Mahadever jataa hoite." There is no reason to believe that his scientific mind really heard the voice. Kalidas believed that it was the goddess Saraswati who made him write all the beautiful verses. The other day we read an article on the Indian mathematician Ramanujan who believed that all the theorems were revealed to him in dream from a god or goddess. Newton was a religious man. But his scientific works were not based on any faith. This is true for Jagadish Bose, Ramanujan, and all other scientists and mathematicians and even this is true for all the prophets or sages to whom knowledge was revealed. All the creations by humans were the result of sweat shed by them. There was nothing divine about them. Newton had to invent a telescope, for example, to study the nature of light.     
On Jan 1, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Kamal Das <kamalctgu@gmail.com> wrote:
 
One example of how faith influences science is the spectrum of sunlight as described by Sir Isaac Newton.  Nobody with common sense would find a difference between Blue and Indigo, but Newton did.  I suppose, he was deeply influenced by his heretic faith of Christian faith called Arian heresy.  He believed in the existence of seven heavens in which seven archangels sang religious songs, and probably as the light emitted by them reached the surface of earth, it became white(or colorless).  Religion is primitive science based mainly on cosmology and herbal therapy.  Mesopotamian civilization, in spite of being an advanced one compared to that of the Egyptians, did not need an afterlife and God(s) who would behave like a tyrant king, but the Egyptians needed such a creation of the priest king named Menes.

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
I believe you misread my comments. What I said is - how scientific assumptions can cross over to faith. Let me give you an example, some scientists believe in the man-made global warming theory, and when data did not support their belief, they manipulated data to stick to their belief. That's how science crosses over to faith.

Now, what is eternity? It's a big unknown, isn't it? Anytime you face an unknown, you are apprehensive about it, that's what I call a fear of the unknown. As you board a plane, you are apprehensive about what's lying ahead. This is a natural psychological response. Eternity is one such unknown. It is quite natural to wonder about the eternity. As we approach it - we get apprehensive about it. It's a fact. Isn't it? What's unscientific about the fear of eternity? I don't get it. Why are you thinking about punishment or reward? I am not talking about it?  I am talking about psychological response to the eternity, which is natural, if not scientific. Isn't it?

I think - you are trying to establish something that you already believe in, which I call faith-based discussion. Under this situation, you will not conceive alternative argument.

Jiten Roy
--- On Mon, 12/31/12, Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Questions of God and Eternity
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, December 31, 2012, 7:54 AM
 
It may not be proper to use faith in the context of science. Science uses assumption, axiom, postulate, and hypothesis. But all of these are not wild guesses or imaginations. It is true that no formal proofs are offered, but they can be obvious and theories bases on these can have prediction capabilities. It follows the so called scientific method. 
Eternity of human life can be a philosophical proposition not a scientific one. So if you say that you have fear of eternity, then you are saying this on the basis of faith. Fear, right path, etc. cannot be scientific constructs, they can well fit into a religion--Godless or without God. Right path is a relative term and can be an important topic in ethics and moral philosophy. 
You have decided on your right path and as a matter of fact we all do. These are obviously important for an individual and the society he belongs to, but this is beyond the jurisdiction of science. 
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 30, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Assumption becomes faith when it is considered as truth, without any evidence. Scientists often assume (hypothesize) something, then investigate about its validity or truth. If they fail to validate, and yet believe in it, that becomes a faith.
 
There is another kind of assumption, in which a model is assumed which helps explain some unknown phenomena. If someone thinks that the model is the truth, and asks others to accept it - it becomes his faith. God and eternity are such phenomenological models to explain some unknowns. A scientist can assume these concepts if they help him understand those unknowns. Models can be physical structures or mathematical expressions. Therefore, if models have physical structures, they can be understood in a physical sense, as the concept of Gods and Goddesses in idols.
 
Fear of eternity/unknown is always with us. Such fears keep us in line. Some people can easily overcome fear of eternity or unknown, and can do certain things that most others can't imagine.
 
Jiten Roy
 
--- On Sun, 12/30/12, Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] About communalism and non communalism--please see my writeup as lot peole accuse Islamists of communalism--please circulate
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, December 30, 2012, 9:13 AM

 
Fear of Unknown eternity? My humble question: Can a scientist believe in eternity in the physical sense? What is this fear about? Is it about any punishment that you may have to face? If this is so, then what are the remedies? Good works? Don't all these boil down to a concept of faith?  Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 28, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
I don't know if my belief in God is circumstantial or what; it could be due to the fear of unknown eternity also. But, one thing I know for sure – I have no fear of God, if you are asking about that. I try to do everything right; that's all. Some people believe in almighty God, yet always claim to be victims of aggression from others. 
 
Anyway, I don't dwell on the existence of God or its form, because I find the concept as a very powerful psychological sanctuary. The existence of God is less important when it's a conceptual entity. So, I leave it alone, and do not feel the need to abandon the idea of God. Instead, I feel strongly that - we should abandon the concept of religion altogether, which is nothing but exploitation of the image of God to serve the petty interests of religion-peddlers on this earth.  
 
It's also not about which scientist believes in what; they are as clueless about God as any one of us. It's really a matter of personal choice. Many people do not need the concept of God, that's fine - as long as they do the right things. 

Jiten Roy


__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Questions of God and Eternity



Exactly, our aim must not be to replace science books with religious books. A religious book revealed to a prophet or a sage may reflect the knowledge of science acquired by man up to the point in time when the revelation occurred. Obviously there can be some prophecies or even scientific predictions included in the religious books. But they have nothing to do with any God. God is a matter of faith, but science is not. 

We see a tendency for religion to seek recognition of science which in my opinion is not necessary. The roles of religion and science are not same. Religion has it's own strengths and to the faithful it has it's own appeal. It is dangerous to give religion an omniscient and all-in-one status. Religion should have selective role in a society although the role a religion plays in an individual's life can be vital. 
In a multi-religious society, for example,  religion must be kept separate from state. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:46 PM, QR <qrahman@netscape.net> wrote:

 

just to be clear, i only shared some info relevant to our discussion. The Qurán itself is a religious book (Known as book containing ayat-SIGNS not science). therefore, it should be taken as "Clues" to greater truth not a path to science. It is a book of signs for those with knowledge of science and wisdom (As frequently said in the Qurán).

So we should not aim to replace books of science with religious book rather we can verify God's "Signs"in the Qurán with established science. For example stages of human development from embryonic phase was described flawlessly over 1400 years ago. Today the man known of father of modern Embryology acknowledged it. 

Take care.

Shalom!


-----Original Message-----
From: subimal chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
To: mukto-mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 3, 2013 5:44 pm
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Questions of God and Eternity

 
Jagadish
 Bose wrote an article in 1894 blending science with mythology. In his childhood he asked the Ganges, "River, where are you coming from?" He heard the voice of the Ganges, "From the jataa (interwoven hair) of Mahadev." At the age of 36, he asked the same question and he still heard the same distinct voice of the river Ganges, "Mahadever jataa hoite." There is no reason to believe that his scientific mind really heard the voice. Kalidas believed that it was the goddess Saraswati who made him write all the beautiful verses. The other day we read an article on the Indian mathematician Ramanujan who believed that all the theorems were revealed to him in dream from a god or goddess. Newton was a religious man. But his scientific works were not based on any faith. This is true for Jagadish Bose, Ramanujan, and all other scientists and mathematicians and even this is true for all the prophets or sages to whom knowledge was revealed. All the creations by humans were the result of sweat shed by them. There was nothing divine about them. Newton had to invent a telescope, for example, to study the nature of light.     
On Jan 1, 2013, at 8:11 PM, Kamal Das <kamalctgu@gmail.com> wrote:
 
One example of how faith influences science is the spectrum of sunlight as described by Sir Isaac Newton.  Nobody with common sense would find a difference between Blue and Indigo, but Newton did.  I suppose, he was deeply influenced by his heretic faith of Christian faith called Arian heresy.  He believed in the existence of seven heavens in which seven archangels sang religious songs, and probably as the light emitted by them reached the surface of earth, it became white(or colorless).  Religion is primitive science based mainly on cosmology and herbal therapy.  Mesopotamian civilization, in spite of being an advanced one compared to that of the Egyptians, did not need an afterlife and God(s) who would behave like a tyrant king, but the Egyptians needed such a creation of the priest king named Menes.

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
I believe you misread my comments. What I said is - how scientific assumptions can cross over to faith. Let me give you an example, some scientists believe in the man-made global warming theory, and when data did not support their belief, they manipulated data to stick to their belief. That's how science crosses over to faith.

Now, what is eternity? It's a big unknown, isn't it? Anytime you face an unknown, you are apprehensive about it, that's what I call a fear of the unknown. As you board a plane, you are apprehensive about what's lying ahead. This is a natural psychological response. Eternity is one such unknown. It is quite natural to wonder about the eternity. As we approach it - we get apprehensive about it. It's a fact. Isn't it? What's unscientific about the fear of eternity? I don't get it. Why are you thinking about punishment or reward? I am not talking about it?  I am talking about psychological response to the eternity, which is natural, if not scientific. Isn't it?

I think - you are trying to establish something that you already believe in, which I call faith-based discussion. Under this situation, you will not conceive alternative argument.

Jiten Roy
--- On Mon, 12/31/12, Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Questions of God and Eternity
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Monday, December 31, 2012, 7:54 AM
 
It may not be proper to use faith in the context of science. Science uses assumption, axiom, postulate, and hypothesis. But all of these are not wild guesses or imaginations. It is true that no formal proofs are offered, but they can be obvious and theories bases on these can have prediction capabilities. It follows the so called scientific method. 
Eternity of human life can be a philosophical proposition not a scientific one. So if you say that you have fear of eternity, then you are saying this on the basis of faith. Fear, right path, etc. cannot be scientific constructs, they can well fit into a religion--Godless or without God. Right path is a relative term and can be an important topic in ethics and moral philosophy. 
You have decided on your right path and as a matter of fact we all do. These are obviously important for an individual and the society he belongs to, but this is beyond the jurisdiction of science. 
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 30, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Assumption becomes faith when it is considered as truth, without any evidence. Scientists often assume (hypothesize) something, then investigate about its validity or truth. If they fail to validate, and yet believe in it, that becomes a faith.
 
There is another kind of assumption, in which a model is assumed which helps explain some unknown phenomena. If someone thinks that the model is the truth, and asks others to accept it - it becomes his faith. God and eternity are such phenomenological models to explain some unknowns. A scientist can assume these concepts if they help him understand those unknowns. Models can be physical structures or mathematical expressions. Therefore, if models have physical structures, they can be understood in a physical sense, as the concept of Gods and Goddesses in idols.
 
Fear of eternity/unknown is always with us. Such fears keep us in line. Some people can easily overcome fear of eternity or unknown, and can do certain things that most others can't imagine.
 
Jiten Roy
 
--- On Sun, 12/30/12, Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] About communalism and non communalism--please see my writeup as lot peole accuse Islamists of communalism--please circulate
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sunday, December 30, 2012, 9:13 AM

 
Fear of Unknown eternity? My humble question: Can a scientist believe in eternity in the physical sense? What is this fear about? Is it about any punishment that you may have to face? If this is so, then what are the remedies? Good works? Don't all these boil down to a concept of faith?  Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 28, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
I don't know if my belief in God is circumstantial or what; it could be due to the fear of unknown eternity also. But, one thing I know for sure – I have no fear of God, if you are asking about that. I try to do everything right; that's all. Some people believe in almighty God, yet always claim to be victims of aggression from others. 
 
Anyway, I don't dwell on the existence of God or its form, because I find the concept as a very powerful psychological sanctuary. The existence of God is less important when it's a conceptual entity. So, I leave it alone, and do not feel the need to abandon the idea of God. Instead, I feel strongly that - we should abandon the concept of religion altogether, which is nothing but exploitation of the image of God to serve the petty interests of religion-peddlers on this earth.  
 
It's also not about which scientist believes in what; they are as clueless about God as any one of us. It's really a matter of personal choice. Many people do not need the concept of God, that's fine - as long as they do the right things. 

Jiten Roy

--- On Fri, 12/28/12, Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Subimal Chakrabarty <subimal@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] About communalism and non communalism--please see my writeup as lot peole accuse Islamists of communalism--please circulate
To: "mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, December 28, 2012, 11:06 AM

 
Thanks. Virtually I don't see any difference between your "prayer" and a non-believer's "wish" for some thing. Fear factor probably is absent in your belief, I suppose. You would know better. 
Any way, recently Higgs (predictor of the so called God particle/Goddam particle or technically called Higgs-Boson), despite he himself being a non-believer has called Richard Dawkins a fundamentalist. Dawkins himself has said that an evangelical and he himself can be matched, but the former would not revise his belief in theological theories in creationism while he will do so with the new scientific and experimental evidences. 
The other day we saw the results of a survey according to which many great scientists have admitted to be believers. It is hard if not impossible to overcome the belief that has been in our psyche for centuries. Are yourself not a victim of this? 
Interestingly the Nobel Laureate physicist who coined the term "God particle" preferred the name "Goddam particle" but the latter was not acceptable to the publisher of the book he wrote. 
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 26, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Jiten Roy <jnrsr53@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
" How do you use your God? Meditate on  Him? If yes, how? Any rituals? And why do you need it any way? Do you pray? And if yes, what are your prayers? I mean what do you pray for?"

I use God whenever I need it for psychological support. I do not pray without specific need, and there is no special language or verse for prayer. 

Someone was about to die of lung cancer. When the news spread, people arranged a mass-prayer session in the a temple. They asked me to join the prayer, and I did. About 200 people gathered in the temple. Everybody was praying for his recovery from this dreadful disease. I was hoping that at least someone in the crowd will be able to draw the attention of God through his/h



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] $100 million Hindu temple thrown open near Hollywood



$100 million Hindu temple thrown open near Hollywood

WASHINGTON: One of the biggest Hindu temples in the US, built at a whopping cost of $100 million near the Hollywood city in Los Angeles has become a major draw for its grandeur and environment-friendly design, since its inauguration.


The 68th Swaminarayan temple of Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS) has been built using 35,000 pieces of meticulously hand carved Italian Carrara marble and Indian Pink Sandstone, temple officials said.

BAPS said that it is first earthquake-proof Mandir in the world and is expected to last for 1,000 years.

"The Mandir is a beautiful testament to the hard work of your congregation who has spent several years to build this place of worship," Chino Hill Mayor Peter Rogers said.

"The Mandir and Cultural Center will indeed be a place that Chino Hills can be proud of for so many, many generations," he said, at the temple's inauguration on December 23.

Using cutting edge technology to protect it from earthquakes, the temple encompasses five pinnacles, two large domes, four balconies, 122 pillars and 129 archways.

The 6,600 hand-carved motifs depict a mosaic of tales of inspiration, devotion and dedication, along with historical figures from Hinduism, temple officials said.

"Artisans created the carvings in India with great love, skill and patience before the pieces were shipped to Chino Hills," a BAPS statement said.

The Mandir is situated on a 20-acre site, complete with 91 foot lotus-shaped reflection pond, a Cultural Centre, gymnasium and classrooms.

It is designed to "calm the mind and open it," said Ronak Patel, a volunteer of the BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha.

"The upper structure of the complex is protected from earthquake damage by separating it from the base with a series of 40 base-isolator units," it said.

"The Mandir also uses a solar power system to generate electricity and reduce adverse effects on the environment. The Mandir combines the best of traditional stone art and architecture and the best of modern technology," said Divyesh Patel, a member of the BAPS Swaminarayan Sanstha.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com//articleshow/17873628.cms?intenttarget=no

--
Thanks & Regards,


Sudhir Srinivasan
B.Arch, MSc.CPM, Dip.ID, Dip.CAD, Dip.PM, Dip.LD
| Architect |




__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[mukto-mona] ? | The Daily Sangram--জনকণ্ঠের ভিত্তিহীন সংবাদের তীব্র নিন্দা--in Bangladesh circumstances is there any value of any statement in police remand



http://www.dailysangram.com/news_details.php?news_id=105752

 

জনকণ্ঠের ভিত্তিহীন সংবাদের তীব্র নিন্দা

রিপোর্টে যা লেখা হয়েছে তা ডাহা মিথ্যা -অধ্যাপক মুজিব

জামায়াতে ইসলামীর কেন্দ্রীয় কর্মপরিষদ সদস্য ডা. সৈয়দ আব্দুল্লাহ মোঃ তাহেরকে জিজ্ঞাসাবাদের সময় প্রদত্ত বলে কথিত তার জবানবন্দির উদ্ধৃতি দিয়ে দৈনিক জনকণ্ঠে ''জিহাদের রিজার্ভ ফোর্স মাঠে নামানোর কথা রিমান্ডে স্বীকার করেছেন তাহের'' শিরোনামে গতকাল শুক্রবার প্রকাশিত ভিত্তিহীন মিথ্যা রিপোর্টের তীব্র নিন্দা প্রতিবাদ জানিয়ে জামায়াতে ইসলামীর সহকারী সেক্রেটারি জেনারেল অধ্যাপক মুজিবুর রহমান বিবৃতি দিয়েছেন

বিবৃতিতে তিনি বলেন, রিপোর্টে ডা. সৈয়দ আব্দুল্লাহ মোঃ তাহেরের কথিত জবানবন্দির উদ্ধৃতি দিয়ে যেসব কথা লেখা হয়েছে তা একেবারে ডাহা মিথ্যা। তাকে মিথ্যা মামলায় জড়ানোর উদ্দেশেই তার উদ্ধৃতি দিয়ে দৈনিক জনকণ্ঠের রিপোর্টে তার বিরুদ্ধে ভিত্তিহীন মিথ্যা অভিযোগ করা হয়েছে

তিনি বলেন, কোন লোক পুলিশের হেফাজতে থাকা অবস্থায় প্রদত্ত কোন জবানবন্দি বাইরে প্রকাশ করা সম্পূর্ণ অন্যায়, অনৈতিক বেআইনী কাজ। কোন পুলিশ কর্মকর্তা ধরনের অনৈতিক বেআইনী কাজ করতে পারে না। দৈনিক জনকণ্ঠের সংশ্লিষ্ট রিপোর্টার পুলিশ ডা. সৈয়দ আব্দুল্লাহ মোঃ তাহেরের জবানবন্দির উদ্ধৃতি দিয়ে রিপোর্ট প্রকাশ করে অন্যায়, অনৈতিক বেআইনী কাজ করেছে

অধ্যাপক মুজিব বলেন, দৈনিক জনকণ্ঠের রিপোর্টে 'জিহাদের জন্য রিজার্ভ ফোর্স মাঠে নামিয়েছে জামায়াত-শিবির। দেশব্যাপী নাশকতা নৈরাজ্য সৃষ্টি করে অচল করে দেবে দেশ। রিজার্ভ ফোর্স গুরুত্বপূর্ণ ব্যক্তি স্পর্শকাতর স্থানে হামলা চালাবে। এজন্য তৈরি করা হয়েছে হিট লিস্ট। ডা. সৈয়দ আব্দুল্লাহ মোঃ তাহেরকে জিজ্ঞাসাবাদে ধরনের তথ্য দিয়েছেন।' মর্মে যেসব কথা লেখা হয়েছে তা সর্বৈব মিথ্যা। এসব বক্তব্য সম্পূর্ণ ভিত্তিহীন মিথ্যা

তিনি বলেন, তদন্তের সাথে সংশ্লিষ্ট পুলিশের এক কর্মকর্তার উদ্ধৃতি দিয়ে 'ডা. তাহেরের উস্কানি নির্দেশ পেয়ে জামায়াত-শিবিরের রিজার্ভ ফোর্সের সদস্যরা এখন নাশকতা ধ্বংসাত্মক কর্মকান্ড চালানোর কৌশল হিসেবে পুলিশ বাহিনীর সদস্যদের বেছে নিয়েছে। আইনশৃক্মখলা বাহিনী বিশেষ করে পুলিশের ওপর হামলা আক্রমণ চালিয়ে যাচ্ছে।' মর্মে যেসব কথা লেখা হয়েছে তার মধ্যে সত্যের লেশমাত্রও নেই

তিনি আরো বলেন, জনকণ্ঠের রিপোর্টে 'তাহের বাহিনীর সশস্ত্র সদস্যরা আলকরা ইউনিয়নের কুলসার গ্রামের ছাত্রলীগ নেতা জসীম, লক্ষ্মীপুর গ্রামের যুবলীগ নেতা আনোয়ার, ছাত্রলীগের সাধারণ সম্পাদক আলমগীর, সোনাইছড়া গ্রামের আওয়ামী লীগ কর্মী আবুল, আওয়ামী লীগের সভাপতি মুক্তিযোদ্ধা হাজী আব্দুল মালেক, চিওড়া ইউনিয়নের শাকতলা গ্রামের যুবলীগ নেতা হেদায়েত উল্লাহসহ আরো অনেককে হত্যা করেছে পঙ্গু করেছে আওয়ামী লীগ, যুবলীগ ছাত্রলীগের অর্ধশতাধিক নেতা-কর্মীকে' মর্মে যেসব কথা লেখা হয়েছে তা একেবারে ডাহা মিথ্যা। তাহের বাহিনী বলতে কোন সশস্ত্র বাহিনী ক্যাডারের কোন অস্তিত্ব নেই। কাজেই ওপরে উল্লেখিত ব্যক্তিদের হত্যার সাথে ডা. সৈয়দ আব্দুল্লাহ মোঃ তাহের জামায়াতে ইসলামী এবং ইসলামী ছাত্রশিবিরের কারো কোন সম্পর্ক নেই। ডা. সৈয়দ আব্দুল্লাহ মোঃ তাহেরসহ জামায়াতে ইসলামী ইসলামী ছাত্রশিবিরের নেতা-কর্মীদের মিথ্যা মামলায় জড়ানোর অস উদ্দেশেই দৈনিক জনকণ্ঠে মিথ্যা রিপোর্ট প্রকাশ করা হয়েছে। ধরনের ভিত্তিহীন মিথ্যা রিপোর্ট প্রকাশ করা থেকে বিরত থাকার জন্য তিনি দৈনিক জনকণ্ঠ পত্রিকা কর্তৃপক্ষের প্রতি আহবান জানান

 



__._,_.___


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___