--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Dr _____,
Namaste. I am sorry I got your name wrong the first time.
The title of my article is now "50 Reasons to Protect Infants from Vaccines", as I have added 5 more points. I can add much more but that would test the patience of the readers. An article very similar to mine by Dr Guy Lanctot, MD, appears here;
Before I reply to your arguments I wish to emphasize a few points. Science is about discovering the truth about the physical universe. Truth which is measurable and verifiable. There is no bias in science. It just states the fact for the society to interprete it and apply it. Science is guided by ethics and morality. The findings are utilised to serve humanity.
Technology is about putting scientific theory into practice. As far as I have read, it is about harnessing science to serve mankind. There is a lot more human interference with technology than with science. Often scientific findings are compromised to make technology viable. This is not bad in itself if the intentions are good and the aim laudable.
Todays technology is dominated by the industry. Private enterprise is about earning profits. It is known that laws can be circumvented even legally as laws are subject to various interpretations. Scientific institutions today are funded by private enterprises. If a scientific institution conducts a study sponsored by private enterpreneurs it gets paid only if the findings are favourable to the sponsor. This is particularly true of the medical industry.
It often happens that the data of the institution may be honestly generated but intentionally misinterpreted to suit industry needs. We know that the Lancet, a premier medical journal, has conceded that it has no way to verify the research articles published in it. This is also true of other journals. It is up to each individual scientist to be ethical so that science prevails over industry profitability.
I will point out to the issue of mercury in vaccines. The vaccine decontaminant Thiomersal is 49.56% ethylmercury by weight. Ethylmercury is an industrial toxin whose use is fraught with great dangers. The bottles of Thiomersal have the skull and dagger mark on them. Thiomersal has been pushed out of many a medical product because of its severe toxicity. Products using Thiomersal have been recalled from the market. Mercury in its any form is known to be dangerous. A study by the Americam Academy of Pediatricians has clearly stated that mercury is particularly dangerous for the pregnant mother and the infant.
However study after study in the USA reveals that Thiomersal is safe. The latest study hopes to "put at rest all doubts". The doctors who are sympathetic to my cause and medical scientists scoff at such studies. I am personally aware of meetings in the Health Ministry that have discussed this very sensitive issue. Even then mercury will not be shifted out of vaccines. Even "mercury free" vaccines contain this heavy metal.
This is because, as intimated to me officially by the Govt of India, mercury is essential to "make vaccines safe". Without this decontaminant the vaccines would cause "more harm".
I wish to also define this "harm". Vaccines consists of bacteria and viruses that are cultured in animal tissues and serum. This is the prime source of contamination. You talk about "pure vaccines". There is no such thing as a pure vaccine, the term is an oxymoron. There have been attempts to replace Thiomersal by 2Phenoxyethelene, another very dangerous neurotoxin. But the results, as informed to me, are "not encouraging". I have with me the PPT presentation that was used by a very senion health ministry official that details all this. I cannot share it with you.
So mercury continues to be pumped into infants. Along with that goes live and genetically modified bacteria and viruses, contaminated serum, heavy metals like mercury and aluminum, carcinogens like formaldehyde and monosodium glutamate, antibiotics that ought not to be injected without skin prick tests and God alone knows what else.
The other aspect of this "harm" is the effect on the financial health of vaccine manufacturers and even the government. The manufacturers would be inundated with court cases if by chance an "official study" concedes that Thiomersal can cause harm. As it is, in the US itself, around 8000 cases are pending against the industry. The first case has been decided upon and has gone in favour of the complainant setting back the US Govt by several hundred million dollars, as assumed by activists as the amount of compensation has not been revealed. In a case where the amount was revealed the compensation was seventy eight million dollars. No wonder both the government and the industry are jittery. The industry has appealed to the government to shut down operations. The US Govt's response has been to grant immunity to vaccine manufacturers, put up a special "vaccine court" and put a surcharge of $60 per vaccine to set up a vaccine damage compensation fund.
In India, the government is in no position to even have "mercury free" vaccines. The process of removing mercury from the end product (mercury is used in the process) will increase the cost of vaccine 4 to 5 times. The government cannot afford this.
The very fact that "scientific studies" repeatedly stress that the presence of mercury, aluminum, squalene and other toxic ingredients in vaccines are "safe" to be injected into infants makes me wary of such studies in the official domain.
Thus I prefer to state the facts to people without depending upon distorted studies. The parents need to have all the information they have before they decide to vaccinate. That vaccines are dangerous is openly conceded and even declared in writing by the biotechnology department of the Govt of India, Ministry of Science and Technology, who promise that genetically engineered and plant based vaccines would relieve the burden on children who are now injected with animal serum, heavy metals and other toxins. What they don't say that the health effects of genetically engineered vaccines will also never be revealed.
Regarding the points raised by you I have already sent a detailed article which will answer many of your questions. I have also sent you a link which clearly shows the disease graphs based upon US Govt data and the fact that vaccines have been introduced at the fag end.
The government announcement in the Hindu has found mention in an article in the Indian Journal of Pediatrics by Dr Jacob Puliyel who is a very senior IMA member and the Co Chairman of the IMA immunisation committee. I have mentioned the name of the article in the article sent to you. The IAP, Orissa, instructions appeared only on print and not on the net (like the TOI article) and I will send it to you separately.
I must also mention that scarlet fever and the plague have come and gone without vaccines "eradicating" them.
Your contention about empirical evidence should also be applied to the fact that illnesses amongst children have shot through the roof after vaccines have been introduced. Why should this evidence be ignored? The nature of vaccine ingredients and the harm they cause can be found here;
Regarding vaccine safety and testing, a CDC website states, "No matter how extensive the testing, it is impossible to allow completely for the infinite variation among individuals, their immune systems, and their reactions to the introduction of new substances into their bodies. Serious systemic reactions to vaccines can occur, although they are very rare." However such reactions are not rare as revealed by the growing epidemic of diseases amongst children who are clearly showing signs and symptoms of the ingredients they are being injected with.
Vaccines are never tested against a plain placebo. The usual procedure is to either test it against a comparable vaccine or a diluted version of the same vaccine. This newsreport will educate you;
In India vaccines and drugs have been tested without even the participant's knowledge. A case in North India revealed that an experimental vaccine was tested on pregnant women. This was widely reported by the press. Such trials are carried out in other countries too;
Vaccine tests leave a lot to be desired. An unbiased report, the full version of which has been pulled out of the net, points out, as salient points:
" How vaccines are tested - typically a new vaccine is tested on 10,000 - 20,000 people before the FDA approves it, is this enough to reliably detect rare complications?... Two safety lapses - in two recent cases, vaccine-safety agencies were slow to act on emerging problems... The antivaccine argument - arguments and suppositions of antivaccine activists... Compensating the injured - the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created in 1988, funded by a small tax on every lot of vaccine, it is an insurance plan against childhood-vaccine injuries..."
This study points out that vaccines are a matter of "trust".
Doctors are instructed not to report vaccine damage. This was publicly admitted by the IMA when it blew the whistle on the OPV and the cases of paralysis caused by it. The government had instructed physicians not to report damage.
Personally I would request you to pose as a ordinary non medical person and take a vaccine damaged child to a pediatrician. You will yourself realise how the system works. I have taken many such children to doctors and have received open threats. A doctor, Dr P... M...., who is a office bearer of the Indian Academy of Pediatricians openly challenged me that, "no doctor will "dare" certify that this child is vaccine damaged." That is the system for you. In case of the OPV the IMA has pointed out that the vaccine surveillance system reports only up to 5% of cases.
There are no official studies comparing vaccinated versus non vaccinated children. Activists have all along been shouting for such studies. The findings of independent studies can be found here;
For presence of monkey viruses in vaccines I will cite an official study so that you will be at ease. This article states that SV 40 is not cancerous and yet details all the steps that are taken to keep vaccines SV40 free (just as the US Govt repeatedly says that Thiomersal is extremely safe and yet is trying to reduce it in American vaccines). However in practical circumstances such tests are very difficult to carry out. A vaccine whistleblower has pointed out that vaccine batches are often monitored "visually". Cases of contamination being found is very regular in the vaccine industry. It has happened with the OPV in India also. Vaccine testing is indeed a "matter of trust".
This official very scientific study borders between "no incidence" and "probably". Interestingly it tries to rationalise the presence of the SV40 in Indians to "man-monkey" physical exposure. Have we ALL been bitten by monkey's? Then there is also the case of "false tests". "We say it is not there so it SHOULD NOT be there". Typical scientific conclusions in today's profit oriented world.
This scientific study says the whole issue needs further probe
There is a SV40 foundation that studies this simian virus
Regarding the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV), this PubMed study reveals the need to study this virus to develop a vaccine for AIDS. So while seeking to develop a highly profitable vaccine in the market we recognise the dangers from SIV but we say that the SIV delivered to humans via the small pox vaccine and the OPV does not have any relation to AIDS. Typical scientific thinking again.
I will strongly object to your view that vaccines strengthen immunity. Vaccines have nothing to do with stregthening immunity. A strong immunity would reject the invasion by way of vaccines. Hence adjuvants are used to "put the immune system on hold" so that the body is forced to accept the intruder. You will find allergies in all vaccinated children. This very fact reveals that the vaccines severely affect the immune system. How the vaccines affect the immune system is described here by Dr Rebecca Carley, a medico legal expert on vaccines. Her article was deleted from the WHO website, where it once appeared;
This article was actually here in the CDC website before it was pulled out;
Regarding 30 vaccine "shots" that I have mentioned (not 30 vaccines), the IAP recommends 24 shots without the consultation of parents and 5 vaccines (Hep A, Varicella, Pneumococcal, Meningitis, Japanese Encephalitis) (6 shots I think or maybe more) after consulting. Thus the figure of 30 shots is correct, the actual may be more. All these vaccines are being routinely given to children by private practitioners.
I will object that you accuse me of lying and misleading the public. To the contrary I am trying to educate parents about the dangers from vaccines, a fact that is being increasingly admitted by even pediatricians. Their first reaction has been not to vaccinate their own children and relatives. There are many pediatricians today who are not vaccinating beyond the IPV as far as their own children and relatives are concerned. I would appeal to them to extend this facility to their patients also, infants who have no voice to protest, but they do protest by persistently crying and trying to make it known that they do not wish to be vaccinated.
And finally here is a link to pictures of vaccine damaged children, at the end. These are only from the small pox vaccine. I must mention that autistic children are severely damaged and do not show any external damage. Thus most vaccine damage will be permanent and internal. Diseases can indeed disfigure children but most of the damage occurs because of trying to meddle with eruptive acute disease. I remember my brother being severely affected by measles and recovering normally under homeopathic treatment.
If I have left anything out kindly let me know.
I am marking a copy to some senior doctors of India, USA and Canada. They may kindly correct me if I have stated anything wrong here.
Regards,
Jagannath.
This little girl is suffering from Eczema Vaccinatum, which is a severe eczema caused by vaccination.
This boy had progressive vaccinia, a massive flesh eating infection caused by vaccination. He had been immuno compromised prior to his shot and unfortunately he died as a result of his injuries.
Source: [from Fenner F., Henderson DA, et al. Smallpox and its Eradication. WHO. 1988]
Vaccine site reaction after a period of time.