__._,_.___
BHBCUC delegation met the President of India
A 15 member delegation of Bangladeshi expats from 8 different countries representing the religious minorities Bangladesh met with the honorable President of India Shri Pranab Mukherjee at noon Monday 21st April 2014. After security clearance at the palatial Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi, the group was cordially greeted by the presidential staff and received by the honorable president. The meeting lasted about 40 minutes and the atmosphere was very frank and cordial. The Honorable President listened to the delegation about the plights of Bangladeshi minorities and opined that he is briefed on the issue all the time. He promised that he would look deep into it and act accordingly. He also said that he would talk with the Prime Minister of India and would request him to take the issue up with the Bangladesh PM. Before the meeting Assistant to the President talk with Mr. Sitangshu Guha. Honorable President Mukherjee also privately sat with Mr. Guha briefly, after the meeting. The delegation was served with traditional delicious snacks.
Caption: Official picture from Rastrapati Bhavan official site
The delegation was briefed previously about the protocol. Everybody stood up and reciprocated 'Namasker' with the President. Sitangshu Guha initially welcomed and thanked the Honorable President. The member then took turns to introduce themselves and made brief remarks. The meeting turned somber when Mrs. Shilpi Chowdhury described how her grandfather-- Nuton Singh of Kundeswari-- was killed by F.K.Chowdhury and Pakistani army. Ms. Chitra Paul added that her father's house was attacked three times since independence. Advocate Ghosh described the situation in ground zero, Bangladesh, while Nabendu Dutta revealed the demographic changes that saw minority population drastically vanishing from the country. Sitangshu Guha concluded by urging the honorable president, as the highest ranking Bangali in the world, lead the action against the sorry saga of minority persecution and to protect them in Bangladesh. The honorable president responded favorably and was shown moved by the delegation's emotion. The delegation presented the President with a memorandum along with 60 colored pictures and two recent books on religious minority persecution.
Members of the delegation were: USA: Sitangshu Guha, Spokesperson and coordinator. Nabendu Dutta, President, BHBCUC, USA. Canada: Dileep Karmaker, Advisor, BHBCUC, Canada. Sweden: Tarun Chowdhury, President, BHBCUC, EU; Chitra Paul, BHBCUC, Sweden. Switzerland: Arun Barua, President, Bangladesh Minority Council, Swiss & BHBCUC, Swiss. France: Udayan Barua, President, BHBCUC, Europe; Swadesh Barua, President, BHBCUC, France. UK: Dr. B.B.Chowdhury, Advisor & President, BHBCUC, UK. Bangladesh: Advocate Rabindra Ghosh, President, BDMW. India: Dr. Mohit Ray, President, CAAMB. The delegation also includes Mrs. Mukti Dutta; Shilpi Chowdhury; Alpana Guha; Snikdha Ghosh; Progananda Bhikku from CHT group and Chanda Hazra, Prakash Chandra Das from CAAMB also joined later on, but missed president's meeting.
Taslima Nasrin meets the delegate team in the evening on 21 April, 2014
California Group met Senator Dianne Feinstein's office
Asish Bhattacharjee from California: As scheduled- we arrived at 9:45am. Senator Dianne Feinstein's San Diego office Field Representative Bill Kratz came to the conference room at 10:00am and apologized for not on time and he was in another meeting. Actually we were scheduled to talk with him at 10:00am. So this opened the door of our conversation. Dr. Dipen Bhattacharjee focused on Introduction, Dr. Probir Paul focused on background, and Dr. Pijush Dewanjee focused on US interest on this. Bill used to be working in State Department, Navy intelligence and currently with senator's Field representative. The conference was lively and discussion got deeper from national security, intelligence, sanction, pressure to all various topics. Bill asked if we want to raise this to State Department too. We requested State Department and senator both. We also requested if we can meet Senator Dianne Feinstein in SD at Dinner or lunch? He will work and see if he can accommodate? That will be very hard but we tried. We went over ISI, government action, Opposition's role, current affair, future trend, minority statistics, current attacks and yesterday's attack. Bill wrote down many references, asked directly to our women representative how women rights are in Bangladesh. Bill also inquired about what would be US role and how that will impact?
We have made a 2-page letter – which also serves as an executive summary. This letter I would say will cover everything that happened before 1971 and after 1971 till 2014. This letter has all references, all documents (Including Petition). References are made with very special care and scrutiny. We also made a binder, CD and Bill praised that he didn't have similar binder or so organized information in his last 10 years job. He has asked questions on many references. He is well aware of what we are going through? He replied that he will be researching some of the references before apprising senator. Ann Thomas wanted to be sure if we are taking about only Hindus? I explained 98% of minorities are Hindus but we are talking for all.
April 29, 2014
বিএনপির চোরাগোপ্তা আর সারা দেশে গুম-হত্যা। ডা : মুহাম্মদ আলী মানিক : গত টার্মে ক্ষমতায় আসার পর 'বিডিআর' হত্যাকান্ডের | |||||
Preview by Yahoo | |||||
From: <krishna1715@gmail.com>
Sent: Thu, 01 May 2014 15:27:08
To: <WaterWatch@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [WaterWatch] Rewriting Geography, BJP Style
By GOPAL KRISHNA
NEW DELHI: The BJP's election manifesto 2014 promises "inter-linking of rivers based on feasibility" to pander to those regional parties which have already exhausted the local water resources in their respective states. To drive home the message, the BJP's prime ministerial candidate says, "In Gujarat, we have inter-linked 20 rivers and the agriculture growth is 10 per cent." Its manifesto for the Lok Sabha elections in 2009 had promised, "massive public sector investments in job-generating infrastructure programmes, especially building of roads and highways, and linking of rivers".
In NDA's 'Agenda for Development, Good Governance and Peace: Lok Sabha 2004' it had promised, "The river-linking project will be launched before August 15, 2004. An initial set of identified schemes will be implemented with public participation by 2015. An effective rehabilitation package for the project-affected persons shall be finalized and implemented." An earlier BJP-NDA 'Agenda for a proud, prosperous India: Lok Sabha 1999" had stated, "We will examine and take time-bound steps to link Ganga-Cauvery rivers."
In September 1999, Prof SR Hashim, who was heading the Government's National Commission for Water Resource Development (NCWRD), submitted the Integrated Water Resource Development Plan. This plan stated that "the Himalayan river-linking data is not freely available but on the basis of public information it appears that the Himalayan river-linking component is not feasible for the period of review up to 2050″.
APJ Abdul Kalam, the then president, in his Independence Day speech on August 14, 2002, affirmed, "It is paradoxical to see floods in one part of our country while some other parts face drought. This drought-flood phenomenon is a recurring feature. The need of the hour is to have a water mission which will enable availability of water to the fields, villages, towns and industries throughout the year, even while maintaining environmental purity. One major part of the water mission would be networking of our rivers. Technological and project management capabilities of our country can rise to the occasion and make this river networking a reality with long term planning and proper investment." Had he sought existing wisdom within the government regarding networking or river-linking of rivers, he would have learnt that after rigorous examination the NCWRD had examined and rejected the idea. The Kalam speech was either echoing the BJP's manifesto of 1999 where the linking of Ganga-Cauvery rivers had been mentioned, or, merely giving expression to his own fancies without any scientific basis.
The linking of rivers came into the picture in 1972 when the Ganga-Cauvery link proposal mooted by KL Rao, former union irrigation minister, was examined and dumped by the Union Ministry of Water Resources after the Central Water Commission found it to be "grossly under-estimated". Prior to this, Captain Dastur had proposed a 'garland of canals' connecting the Himalayan rivers and the peninsular rivers; this was found "technically unsound and economically prohibitive". Despite these rejections, some unknown lobbies kept pursuing it and planting it in the minds of key functionaries of the Government of India.
Notably, Mukesh Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Industries Limited, had also said that "a convergence of civil engineering and agriculture can build a trans-India water resources system by linking rivers."
The 'networking of rivers' does not mean drawing some mega litres from one river and pouring it into another, like one does with containers (or even with canals). The ramifications are much wider because a river is not only the water that flows or the channel which holds the flow. A river is the dynamic face of the landscape. In the drama of history, the eco system is not a stage — it is the cast.
Kalam claimed that inter-linking of rivers will provide 300 billion cubic metres (BCM) of additional water. However, the National Water Development Agency (NWDA) provided a different figure of 174 BCM. It has been estimated that canals involved in this project will cause the submergence of 625, 000 hectares of land while reservoirs will lead to the submergence of 1,050,000 hectares, leading to the displacement of about 3.l4 million people. He has repeatedly observed that floods affect eight major water basins, 40 million hectares and 260 million people.
However, the 'surplus' water being diverted through inter-linking ranges between 2 and 2.5 per cent of peak flood discharge of surplus rivers like the Ganga, Brahmaputra and Mahanadi. This is corroborated by the Central Water Commission, NWDA, and authors of the National Commission for Integrated Water Resources Development Plan.
The Supreme Court judgment on the basis of an application moved by an amicus curie who put the speech of Kalam before the court has put the focus back on the Interlinking of Rivers (ILR). If implemented, it will be the world's biggest infrastructure project and will alter the nation's geography for all times to come. Indeed, does it make ecological sense?
The project proponents ask, 'What is the cost of not taking up the project?' Their argument implies that if it is not taken up it would mean an opportunity lost. However, they fail to answer several relevant questions with regard to "costs" posed by the South Asia Network of Dams, Rivers & People (SANDRP): What is the cost of neglecting rainwater harvesting potential in the river basins of India, including groundwater recharging? What is the cost of not assessing and realising the benefits of watershed development in any of the river basins? What is the cost of not maintaining and rejuvenating the existing local water systems? What is the cost of not arresting siltation in existing reservoirs which are filling up at much higher rates than the design assumptions? What is the cost of not getting optimum results from the existing irrigation infrastructure in India, the largest in the world? What is the cost of maintaining drainage systems in agricultural areas? What is the cost of not arresting the pollution of India's freshwater systems? What is the cost of not assessing the demand-side management options in water and energy systems? What is the cost of not arresting the transmission and distribution losses from our water and energy supply systems, stopping thefts, and making the elite pay for the services they use? What is the cost of not stopping the 'hidden export' of water with huge subsidies that India is indulging in, vis-à-vis sugar and food grains export? What is the cost of not managing peak power demands, not charging higher tariff during peak periods and not using the existing hydro capacities for peak power supply? And, finally, what is the cost of not allowing adequate freshwater flows in the dammed rivers downstream?
The proponents obstinately pursuing the ILR project, in their bid to outwit the resistance to such projects, have a Plan A and Plan B. The State's proposals are part of Plan B. Plan A is the national interlinking of rivers. The ILR programme is estimated at an aggregated cost of a gigantic Rs 1,25,342 crore in terms of 2002-3 prices. It is aimed to create additional storage facilities and transfer water from water-surplus regions to more drought-prone areas through inter-basin transfers. It is claimed that it will provide additional irrigation in about 30 million hectares and net power generation capacity of about 20,000 to 25,000 MW.
While the NWDA claims that Ganga, Kosi and Gandak rivers have surplus water, the Bihar government has refuted the claim. Similar reservations have been voiced by other states. Jairam Ramesh had submitted in Parliament in 2005: "…in my view, there would be no greater calamity than massive inter-linking of rivers." However, after the Supreme Court's verdict and BJP's support of ILR in its current manifesto, Ramesh and the Congress leadership chose to maintain a collusive silence. The Congress-led central government, the BJP-led Gujarat and MP government, and the Samajwadi Party-led UP government have signed MoUs to undertake the ILR project. Even the JD(U)-led Bihar government is keen to undertake ILR projects. States like Kerala, Punjab, West Bengal and Maharashtra had earlier rejected the ILR project of Plan A; but they have got trapped by the state-specific Plan B. The NWDA has proposed 30 major river link canals involving 37 rivers throughout the country to transfer water from so-called surplus basins to water-deficit basins as part of the peninsular and Himalayan components of the ILR project.
Notably, Bangladesh, as a downstream country, will be directly affected. The apex court judgment acknowledges that the construction of storage reservoirs on the principal tributaries of the Ganga and Brahmaputra rivers in India, Bhutan and Nepal makes this an international issue. Bangladesh is also an affected party, but it does not find mention in the judgment.
Ironically, Justice Swatanter Kumar, who authored the judgment to undertake the world's most ecologically disastrous project, is currently the chairman of the National Green Tribunal, whose mandate is to prevent environmental damage.
A study conducted by the National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER) cites A Vaidyanathan's 2001 paper titled 'Irrigation Subsidies' and the 'Report of the Committee on Pricing of Irrigation Water' (1992) drafted for the Planning Commission under his chairmanship. Ironically, his views debunking the myth of 'surplus' rivers are deliberately ignored. Indeed, the judgment also did not take note that as per NCAER the new aggregated cost is Rs 1,25,343 crore or 22.4 per cent lower than the earlier aggregate estimate of Rs 5,60,000 crore, at 2002-03 prices.
In the past, the court has rightly and consistently held that large infrastructure projects invariably raise technical and policy issues which the courts are not equipped to handle. In view of the reasons cited above and especially an evolving international law on transboundary rivers, here is a clear case for the apex court to review its order on "networking of rivers."
In any case, the critical issue is how to solve India's water problem. As per the Planning Commission's Tenth Plan document, there are 383 ongoing major and medium projects awaiting completion, 111 of which are pending for more than 26 years. All these projects can be completed within five to eight years yielding an additional potential of about 14 million hectares at a cost of Rs 100,000 crore, as estimated by the Tenth Plan task force.
The second component listed in the Plan is the development of minor irrigation, mostly in the eastern and northeastern regions. The total potential assessed is 24.5 million hectares with a total investment of Rs 54,000 crore of which the government is expected to provide only Rs 13,500 crore, the balance coming from beneficiary farmers and institutional loans. The cost per hectare is only Rs 20,000 and gestation period almost nil, against a cost of Rs 100,000 and a 12-year gestation period for major and medium projects.
The third, equally beneficial scheme mentioned in the Plan is the groundwater recharge master plan prepared by the Central Ground Water Board, needing Rs 24,500 crore to trap 36 billion cubic metres of water annually. These measures are clearly better than the networking of rivers. In this context, the judgment seems akin to what the science journal, New Scientist, referred to as "replumbing the planet."
Rivers shape the terrain and lives of people by its waters which are always in a dynamic state. Breaking this dynamic would unleash forces of uncontrolled change and invite the 'law of unintended consequences'. Let's remember the terrible Aral Sea disasters in which two Siberian rivers were diverted.
Certainly, if water scarcity is the perennial question, aren't there better answers available?
The writer is a public policy analyst and Convener, Toxics Watch Alliance, New Delhi.
(1 comment)
Dr Priyambada Hejmadi, noted zoologist, once told me that this river linking project would cause absolute damage to India's reverine ecology. Once realised, some of the special variety pisces like the the Gangetic Hilsa and the famous Brahmaputra catfish may go extinct in a few year.
Rewriting Geography, BJP Style | The Citizen
Rewriting Geography, BJP Style | The Citizen Rewriting Geography, BJP Style By GOPAL KRISHNA Fri Apr 25, 2014 | |||||
Preview by Yahoo | |||||
Get your own FREE website, FREE domain & FREE mobile app with Company email. | Know More > |
Mukto-Mona Writers' Corner has posted a new item, 'DANCE OF DEMOCRACY: INDIAN
STYLE'
India is dancing with democracy. The General Election to the national Parliament
is on. One will lose count of total number of political parties (excluding
independent candidates) fighting in this election. However, all the political
parties have aligned into three groups, viz: BJP led NDA, Congress led UPA and
other parties not aligned to NDA [...]
You may view the latest post at
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=2857
You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are
posted.
Best regards,
Mukto-Mona Writers' Corner
------------------------------------
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mukto-mona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mukto-mona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mukto-mona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/