Banner Advertiser

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

[ALOCHONA] Water or Coke



Water

1. We all know that water is important but I've never seen it written down like this before.

2. 75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated. (Likely applies to half world population)

3. In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often mistaken for hunger.&

4. Even MILD dehydration will slow down one's metabolism as much as 3%.

5. One glass of water will shut down midnight hunger pangs for almost 100% of the dieters studied in a U- Washington study.

6. Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.

7. Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day could significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of sufferers.

8. A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term memory, trouble with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the computer screen or on a printed page.

9. Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon cancer by 45%, plus it can slash the risk of breast cancer by 79%, and one is 50% less likely to develop bladder cancer.

Are you drinking the amount of water you should every day?

COKE

1. In many states (in the USA) the highway patrol carries two gallons of Coke in the truck to remove blood from the highway after a car accident.

2. You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be gone in two days.

3. To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the toilet bowl and let the "real thing" sit for one hour, then flush clean The citric acid in Coke removes stains from vitreous china.

4. To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the bumper with a crumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in Coca-Cola.

5. To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of Coca-Cola over the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.

6. To loosen a rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola to the rusted bolt for several minutes.

7. To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into the baking pan, wrap the ham in aluminum foil, and bake. Thirty minutes before the ham is finished, Remove the foil, allowing the drippings to mix with the Coke for a sumptuous brown gravy.

8. To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke into a load of greasy clothes, add detergent, and run through a regular cycle. The Coca-Cola will help loosen grease stains. It will also clean road haze from your windshield.

For Your Information:

1. The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. Its Ph is 2.8. It will dissolve a nail in about 4 days. Phosphoric acid also leaches calcium from bones and is a major contributor to the rising increase in osteoporosis.

2. To carry Coca-Cola syrup (the concentrate) the commercial truck must use the Hazardous material place cards reserved for highly corrosive materials.

3. The distributors of coke have been using it to clean the engines of their trucks for about 20 years!

Now the question is, would you like a glass of WATER  or COKE ?



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Judgment of Appealate Division [1 Attachment]

[Attachment(s) from kazi Mohammad Ismail included below]

salam

pls see the attachment for full judgment.

the sum-up of the judgment is as follows:-

ons are made as under:
183
(a) all executive acts, things and deeds done and actions taken during the period from 15th August 1975 to 9th April, 1979 which are past and closed;
(b) the actions not derogatory to the rights of the citizens;
(c) all acts during that period which tend to advance or promote the welfare of the people;
(d) all routine works done during the above period which even the lawful government could have done.
(e) (i) the Proclamation dated 8th November, 1975 so far it relates to omitting Part VIA of the Constitution;
(ii) the Proclamations (Amendment) Order 1977 (Proclamations Order No. 1 of 1977) relating to Article 6 of the Constitution.
(iii) the Second Proclamation (Seventh Amendment) Order, 1976 (Second Proclamation Order No. IV of 1976) and the Second Proclamation (Tenth Amendment) Order, 1977 (Second Proclamation Order No. 1 of 1977) so far it relates to amendment of English text of Article 44 of the Constitution;
(iv) the Second Proclamation (Fifteenth Amendment) Order, 1978 (Second Proclamation Order No.IV of 1978) so far it relates to substituting Bengali text of Article 44;
(v) The Second Proclamation (Tenth Amendment) Order, 1977 (Second Proclamation Order No. 1 of 1977) so far it relates to inserting Clauses (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) of Article 96 i.e.
184
provisions relating to Supreme Judicial Council and also clause (1) of Article 102 of the Constitution, and
(f) all acts and legislative measures which are in accordance with, or could have been made under the original Constitution.
While dismissing the leave petitions we are putting on record our total disapproval of Martial Law and suspension of the Constitution or any part thereof in any form. The perpetrators of such illegalities should also be suitably punished and condemned so that in future no adventurist, no usurper, would dare to defy the people, their Constitution, their Government, established by them with their consent. However, it is the Parliament which can make law in this regard. Let us bid farewell to all kinds of extra constitutional adventure for ever.




Attachment(s) from kazi Mohammad Ismail

1 of 1 File(s)


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] SC: It's' Bangladeshi nationalism'



SC: It's' Bangladeshi nationalism'
 
Dhaka, July 27 (bdnews24.com)—The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in an amended ruling on the High Court verdict, which had declared illegal the Fifth Amendment to the constitution, has commented that the nationalism will be 'Bangladeshi' instead of 'Bengali'.

The highest appeals court's verdict on two petitions challenging the repeal of the Fifth Amendment was published on Tuesday.

The six-member full bench of the Appellate Division, headed by former chief justice Mohammed Tafazzul Islam, published the verdict after a long meeting.

Attorney general Mahbubey Alam told journalists after getting a copy of the verdict: "The Appellate Division has upheld the High Court verdict terming illegal the usurping of power by Khandaker Mushtaque Ahmed, Abu Sa'dat Mohammad Sayem and Ziaur Rahman."

"However, the Appellate Division has commented that despite the mention of Bengali nationalism in the High Court verdict, nationalism should be Bangladeshi," he pointed out.

The attorney general also said that the main portion of the latest verdict did not make any reference to the four foundations of the constitution. It strongly criticised unconstitutional takeover of power and expressed the resolve that such power grab needs to be stopped once for all.

Responding to a query, Alam said, "The main portion of the verdict makes no reference to secularism and use of religion for political purposes."

"The Appellate Division has amended the High Court verdict on transition period. The Appellate Division also expressed its support for administrative works carried out from 1975 to 1979 that did not infringe on citizen's rights. The Supreme Court has declared completely illegal martial law," he added.

On Feb 2, the bench dismissed the petitions after six days of hearings that began on Jan 19.

It said in the rejection, "Petitions are dismissed with modification and observation."

Law minister Shafique Ahmed told reporters after that ruling that the order laid the foundation for reviving the spirit of the independence war which was at the core of the country's constitution.

Regarding the amendment to the constitution, he had said they would take measures after receiving the copy of the order.

The Fifth Amendment was meant to provide constitutional legitimacy to the governments in power — military or otherwise — following the 1975 assassination of the founding president Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.

But the High Court gave a ruling in August 2005, declaring the Fifth Amendment illegal, in response to a petition challenging the legality of the Martial Law Regulation of 1977.

In its ruling, the High Court declared illegal three regimes between August 15, 1975 and February 1979, headed by Khandaker Mushtaque Ahmed, Abu Sa'dat Mohammad Sayem and Ziaur Rahman.

The ruling exempted certain measures of those regimes initiated for public welfare. But the court in its judgment said all the changes in government from August 15, 1975 right up to the national elections of 1991 were unconstitutional.

The present Awami League-led government's withdrawal from a petition made by the previous BNP-led regime, against the High Court ruling, prompted the two petitions by BNP secretary general Khandaker Delwar Hossain and three pro-Jamaat-e-Islami lawyers last month.

The court said that by rejecting the two leave petitions, "We are completely disapproving of military rule and stay of constitution. Those involved in these illegal acts should be trialled and criticised so that in the future, no over-eager or illegal power usurper can show the impudence to remove the people's constitution and the government they have elected.

It also said in the verdict, "Even though the parliament can implement a law for this, we are saying goodbye forever to all actions outside the constitution."



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Fwd: [Dahuk]: Forgiveness





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Fasih Ur Rehman Khan <fasihcool@yahoo.com>
Date: Jul 1, 2010 5:18 PM
Subject: [Dahuk]: Forgiveness
To:

 

Forgiveness-Its Something Extra Special!!!

"So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among you.'' (Quran-8:1)

The Messenger of Allah Muhammad [Peace be upon him] is reported to have said:

"
If one gives charity it does not diminish his wealth; if one forgives others, Allah bestows more honour on him; and if one humbles himself for Allah's sake, Allah exalts him higher." (Hadith-Muslim)

Some Handy Tips!!!

  • Make dua[pray]- For only Allah can reconcile hearts and differences
  • Forgive- He who forgives is forgiven and Allah will elevate his status!
  • Act- SMS[text],call, email etc or even better personally approach the person/s and ask them forgiveness.
  • Remove Hatred-Don't hold any hatred in your heart-hatred is the cancer of the heart and soul- It Destroys the Hater and Not the hated!
  • It's a process-Remember, forgiveness is a process that takes time and patience to complete. You must be ready. Realize that forgiveness is for you - not for anyone else
  • Not Condoning-Realize that forgiving does not mean you are condoning the actions of the offender or what they did to you. It does mean that you will blame less and find a way to think differently about what happened to you.
  • Refocus-Refocus on the positives in your life. A life well lived is the best revenge. People who find a way to see love, beauty and kindness around them are better able to forgive and get past their grievances.
  • There is no such thing as an unforgivable act. So don't let your fear of what you did, or rage about what was done to you, dissuade you from either seeking or granting forgiveness.
  • Stay balanced. The number of apologies you seek should be proportional to the number you are willing to offer, because the doing of each nurtures the capacity for the other.
  • Know that you are never alone. Allah is always with you!
  • Allow love to triumph over logic. There will always be a good reason to keep doing what you are doing or to withhold your forgiveness from someone else. But real issue is whether or not you love them enough to go beyond that logic.
  • Keep it simple. Apologize for, or forgive, one thing at a time. There is always more to the story, but this is not the moment to explore it.
  • Remember that forgiveness is not always the end of the process, but the beginning of a new level of relationship which may continue to be shaped into something very special
  • Celebrate the moment of forgiveness by thanking Allah for giving you the opportunity to remove this burden off your shoulders. Give Sadaqah[charity] as it pleases Allah and removes Allah's anger.





__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] ARTICLE TO MEMORIZE!!! ARTICLE TO DIGEST !!!!

Respected BNP-JAMAT-NAPAKI supporters
of this forum ------ Please READ, MEMORIZE
AND DIGEST THE ATTACHED ARTICLE. This article is the perfect answer to all fabricated,
fradulent, baseless propaganda of antiliberation forces since our independence !!!

 

http://www.khabor.com/news/bangladesh/07/bangladesh_news_07272010_0000007.htm

 

Respectfully,

Dr. Manik





________________________________
From: Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@gmail.com>
To: Eastside Peds <eastside_peds@bellsouth.net>; dahuk <dahuk@yahoogroups.com>;
wideminds <WideMinds@yahoogroups.com>; Sonar Bangladesh
<sonarbangladesh@yahoogroups.com>; Ayubi <s_ayubi786@yahoo.com>; Sattabadi
Nagarik <sattabadi@yahoo.com>; Anis Ahmed <anis.ahmed@netzero.net>; Md. Aminul
Islam <aminul_islam_raj@yahoo.com>; alochona <alochona@yahoogroups.com>;
farhadmazhar@hotmail.com; Bangla Zindabad <Bangladesh-Zindabad@yahoogroups.com>;
history_islam@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 27, 2010 3:53:22 AM
Subject: [Sonar Bangladesh] Fwd: [Bangladesh-Zindabad] WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
1/11 ??

 
Arey  Maaaaaaaaaaannnnnnn nniiiikkkk   Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a

You are absolutely truthful and correct in telling that the truth for the first
time that " it is not a propaganda of BAl rather it is opinion of the eminent
Paa Chata dalal jibis"


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eastside Peds <eastside_peds@ bellsouth. net>
Date: Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM
Subject: [Bangladesh- Zindabad] WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 1/11 ??
To: notun_bangladesh@ yahoogroups. com, "anis.ahmed@netzero. com"
<anis.ahmed@netzero. com>, widemind@yahoogroup s.com, Bangladesh-Zindabad
@yahoogroups. com, sonarbangladesh@ yahoogroups. com, odhora@yahoogroups. com,
alochona@yahoogroup s.com, history_islam@ yahoogroups. com, dahuk
<dahuk@yahoogroups. com>, "Md. Aminul Islam" <aminul_islam_ raj@yahoo. com>, Mo
Assghar <moassghar@yahoo. com>, "Dr. Abid Bahar" <abidbahar@yahoo. com>,
serajurrahman@ btinternet. com, farhadmazhar@ hotmail.com, zoglul@hotmail.
co.uk, Sattabadi Nagarik <sattabadi@yahoo. com>, Nayan Khan <udarakash08@
yahoo.com>
Cc: alapon@yahoogroups. com, alochona@yahoogroup s.com, chottala@yahoogroup
s.com



  
  
Respected Readers,
 
BNP-JAMAT JOTE was responsibe
for the emergent of ungorgettable
1/11 !! Its not a propaganda of AL,
rather opinion of neutral eminent
personalities of the country. Please
open the link for details:
 
http://www.khabor. com/news/ bangladesh/ 07/bangladesh_ news_07262010_
0000006.htm
 
Dr. Manik
 




____________ _________ _________ __
From: Faruque Alamgir <faruquealamgir@ gmail.com>
To: "anis.ahmed@netzero. com" <anis.ahmed@netzero. com>; widemind@yahoogroup
s.com;

Bangladesh-Zindabad @yahoogroups. com; sonarbangladesh@ yahoogroups. com;
notun_bangladesh@ yahoogroups. com; odhora@yahoogroups. com;
alochona@yahoogroup s.com; history_islam@ yahoogroups. com; dahuk
<dahuk@yahoogroups. com>; Md. Aminul Islam <aminul_islam_ raj@yahoo. com>; Mo
Assghar <moassghar@yahoo. com>; Dr. Abid Bahar <abidbahar@yahoo. com>;
serajurrahman@ btinternet. com; farhadmazhar@ hotmail.com; zoglul@hotmail.
co.uk;

Sattabadi Nagarik <sattabadi@yahoo. com>; Nayan Khan <udarakash08@ yahoo.com>
Sent: Mon, July 26, 2010 12:37:13 PM
Subject: [notun_bangladesh] Re: Fw: Who is Syed Aslam?

 


Friends
 
It is not only fake sayoood  ass laam, there are few other deadliest vile BALIST

with different names(it appears different names are given by different fathers
and amidst they lost original one) are busy in falsifying, concocting and
cooking stories to defame ISLAM and Bangladesh to get reward for role of
traitors from their HINDU Masters or any other master s elsewhere. They know it
well that the gory present world order would buy stories that undermines, taints

and defames ISLAM. The western world and their master Hindus of Hindu Staaan
would be able to tighten their grip over us through the pet dogs they throne.
 
All their hard toil gone in vain since the conscious people have rejected the
hue n cry day in and day out of the present day Goebbels duly nurtured and paid
by the  RAW.
 
WE DO NOT HAVE LEARN SECULARISM FROM GREAT STALWART LIKE Asad noor/hoson
imam(boma imam) etc etc who migrated from the largest Secular nation HINDU 
STAAN to then ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN in early 60's. Did they ever
explained why they came to the Kottor(as per their version) Islamic country
??????  No, since they were dishonest n did not say. The answer is simple that
they came to save the ass from the blood haunting BASTARD HINDU Fundementalist
whose hands were tainted with minorities(speciall y Muslims) blood.
 
Friends, these crooks are none but the descendents of rai bollobh/umi
chand/jogot seth/mir modon/mohammodi beg/mir jafor gong with the ulterior motive

to pave the of implementation of the great satan HINDUVTA state as per Nehru
Doctrine in the region.

 
BE IT VERY CLEAR THAT BANGLADESHHAS COME TO STAY N NO VILE POWER CAN UNDO IT
OTHER THAN MAKING SOME DISTURBANCE HERE N THERE. WE ARE PROUD BANGLADESHIS
HAVING FIRM FAITH N RESPECT ONSECULARISM ( not the blood tainted secularism of
the HINDUS of HINDUSTAAN).

 
Let the heroic sacrifice of the Martyrs remain ever glowing in the "Akash Batash

NodiPrantor" of BANGLADESH n the LalSabujPataka to fly high with right dignity n

honour forever n ever.
Hell with HINDU  STAAANI Paa Chata Dalals n Paki Janwar's Doshors
BANGLADESH  ZINDABAD
ZINDABAD  BANGLADESHZINDABAD

Faruque Alamgir




On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:14 AM, anis.ahmed@netzero. com <anis.ahmed@netzero.
com> wrote:

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
>Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>Dear All:

>Syed Aslam, fake name of a person who started sending emails in other fake
>names, Gungadina and Gungadina1 from New York in 2001. This gentleman is a
>diehard BALIST who spent his life in Pakistan before migrating to the USA after

>marrying an immigrant girl three decades ago.

>He tried many careers to build his life from Pizza deliveryman to apartment
>owner for about two decades but became successful in making millions of dollars

>after 2005 in doing loan officer for real estate business at the cost of
>dishonesty and violating laws. After laundering money to Bangladesh and
>transferring to his sibling accounts he closed his "loan officer" business just

>before the government crackdown.

>Currently, no body knows his whereabouts except a few leaders of the Awami
>League and siblings to keep himself safe from any investigation. A former
>Madrasha student in Pakistan he knows a lot about Islam and Pakistan other than

>his motherland Bangladesh and Awani League.

>Although he knows how to defend Islam and Palestine issues against Israeli
>actions but often dilute his religious faith (Islam) when Awami League,
>Bangladesh, India, RAW and Jamat-e-Islam come into question. He surrenders his
>ideology when "India and RAW" become part of discussion in any form either
>nationally or internationally.

>He tries take shelter under Indian umbrella to keep himself safe from any
>problem for his misdeeds.

>That's much today as a lot of facts or evidences can be laid down about this
>mysterious person and are kept reserved now for future.

>Best friend
>
>
>____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ ___
>FIRE SALE: iPads for $23.74?
>SPECIAL REPORT: iPads are being auctioned for an incredible 85% off!
>ctips.net

      


RE: [ALOCHONA] Fwd: Mutiny in Bangladesh: unsolved mystery threatens regional stability



      Zag the jackal here, again, to pierce the monotone of the hukka-huaaaaa squad!
      He is unstoppable whenever he sniffs the RAW!
      But we are not outfoxed.
 


From: bdmailer@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:34:40 +0600
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Fwd: Mutiny in Bangladesh: unsolved mystery threatens regional stability

 
------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Zoglul Husain
<zoglul@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Jul 25, 2010

 
There cannot be any doubt that this is a report produced by a RAW operative. There are good reasons to presume that the BDR massacre was perpetrated by an Indian commando with the help of a small group of Indian collaborators in the govt and the BAL, the aim being to destroy the strength of the BDR and the army, and bring the defence capabilities of BD under Indian control.
 
About the references to Islamic terrorism in Bangladesh, there are circumstantial evidences to show that the JMB was created by India and HuJI-B by Israel in order to make Bangladesh a target of certain international conspiracies. 
 
RAW regularly churns out reports like this to malign Bangladesh, but in the long run, they will not succeed.
 
May I remind your readers of the following report on BDR?

 

The Peelkhana Mutiny (Bangladesh Rifles HQ) And Massacre

 

By An Old Brigadier General

 

Published in the NFB on Friday February 26 2010 11:57:00 AM BDT

 

http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidDate=2010-02-26&hidType=HIG&hidRecord=0000000000000000306815
 
 
 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:59:20 +0600
Subject: Mutiny in Bangladesh: unsolved mystery threatens regional stability
From:
bdmailer@gmail.com


Mutiny in Bangladesh: unsolved mystery threatens regional stability

As long the mutiny in Bangladesh remains an unsolved mystery, it opens the door to instability in a country of 150 million people struggling with rising extremism as well as a region that includes Pakistan and India.

By David Montero, Correspondent / July 22, 2010
Dhaka, Bangladesh

More than a year has passed since soldiers within the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), a paramilitary border force, staged a violent mutiny at their headquarters in the capital, Dhaka. Yet no one seems to really know why it happened.On the morning of Feb. 25, 2009, BDR soldiers mutilated and killed 57 of their officers, and raped and killed many of the officers' wives. Then, just as suddenly as the carnage began, most of the mutineers slipped into the city, disappearing without a trace. The attack was the most grievous blow dealt to the Army in Bangladesh's history.

A full reckoning has only just begun. Many of the offending rebels are now well known, their crimes well documented. In mid-July, Bangladesh charged 824 of them with murder and conspiracy, the single largest charge in the country's history. Formerly East Pakistan, Bangladesh became its own country in 1971, when the two parts of Pakistan split after a war which also involved its neighbor, India.
In the absence of an accepted explanation

But the leaders of the attack remain unidentified, and it is still not known how many people were actually involved, let alone what their motive was. Some analysts worry that lack of a satisfactory explanation will threaten the already politically volatile nation. Others say that further instability in Bangladesh would open up the country to terrorist organizations in the region.

The government finally offered a motive in a report this month: The mutiny, it said, was a spontaneous outburst caused by longstanding grievances over pay. BDR soldiers make about $70 a month, while their officers are accused of living lavish lifestyles.

But many here are unconvinced, and have sought answers of their own. In drawing-room conversations, blogs, and Facebook postings, many here have gravitated to the possibility that terrorist groups are to blame.

The mutiny, they speculate, was an attempt to derail a secular democracy emerging under the leadership of a liberal, female prime minister, Sheikh Hasina Wajed, who took office just two months before the mutiny erupted.

It is still a theory – and one that, for now, the government seems to be discounting. But in this land of conspiratorial politics, many informed observers are not willing to completely rule it out.
The land of conspiratorial politics

Bangladeshis have been here before.

In 1975, the country's first prime minister, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, was killed in another military coup. In 1981, the Army chief who took power in that coup, Zia ur Rehman, was himself assassinated.

Ever since, explosions and assassinations have rocked this country with great frequency but little explanation. Bangladeshis are still putting together the pieces.

This mutiny is no different. Three official investigations – one by the civilian government, one by the Army, and one by the police – had previously reported little about a motive.

"I've not seen a situation where people take up arms and kill 57 of their officers. It defies logic. It is not a spontaneous outburst," says retired Maj. Gen. Shahid Anam, who spent 35 years in the Army and is now a security analyst in Dhaka. Anam would not put full stock in the theory that extremists are to blame.But like many here, he wouldn't rule it out either.

Last March, an official charged with coordinating the government's inquiries, Commerce Minister Farukh Khan, announced that some of the mutineers had links to Jamat'ul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB). Local media investigations corroborated the notion. But Mr. Khan later retracted his statement. He did not explain why.Others are more adamant about such links.

A possible clue?

As proof, many have pointed to the story of one of the fallen in the mutiny, Col. Gulzar Uddin Ahmed.In 2006, Gulzar, as he is widely known, was appointed the first director of intelligence for Bangladesh's Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), a special police force. Within months, he arrested hundreds of operatives of JMB, the country's most lethal terrorist organization. He then arrested six of the group's leaders.

Because of Gulzar's police work, all six men were all put to death in 2007. Gulzar became a national hero. Then, in early 2009, he was transferred to a position of command within the BDR. He had planned to take his family on a vacation. But first he went to attend the BDR's annual meeting in Dhaka.

That was Feb. 25, the day of infamous bloodshed. Gulzar's body was found 10 days after the mutiny. He had been tortured before being killed – a sign, many believe, of retribution. "He was the most brilliant officer in the police department, who was totally committed to uproot Islamic militancy," says Sharier Kabir, an outspoken activist against Islamic extremism in Bangladesh. "That's why he has been killed so brutally."

Gulzar's status as a martyr in the fight against terrorism has risen. His Facebook page, created posthumously, has more than 22,000 fans. JMB's targeting of Gulzar may be an apocryphal tale. But there are, analysts say, grounds for extremist groups to target the new prime minister.

In her return to power, Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina promised to reinstate Bangladesh's 1972 Constitution, which would remove Islam as the state religion and posit secularism as the country's foundation. She swore she would try those Bangladeshis who, in siding with Pakistan during Bangladesh's war of liberation in 1971, had killed fellow Bangladeshis in the name of ensuring a more puritan form of Islam. And she had promised to destroy international terrorist networks operating in her country.

In this quest, Hasina knew she had an ally in the BDR force. In 2008, the BDR's director general, Shakil Ahmed, publicly vowed to crush militancy in Bangladesh.

He singled out both international operators like Harkut-ul-Jihad (HUJI), a terrorist group founded in Pakistan, and domestic groups like JMB. Two months after being elected, Hasina stood beside Mr. Ahmed to address soldiers at the BDR's headquarters on Feb. 24, 2009 – the day before the mutiny.

What could the goal of the mutiny have been?

If the goal of the mutiny was simply for BDR soldiers to secure better pay, that has not yet happened. The government is still mulling over such reforms. In the meantime, the government has passed the Border Guard Bangladesh Act 2010, which makes mutiny an offense subject to capital punishment.

And if it was to deter Hasina from taking on radical groups, the opposite appears true. Since her election, RAB and BDR have launched a sweeping crackdown on local and international terrorist organizations, making some of their most sensational arrests since Gulzar's. In the churn of news and analysis, Bangladeshis continue to grasp at all possibilities.

But whatever the mutiny's goals, analysts say, it appears not to have gotten far."It's a complex scenario. There has to be more serious research on it," says Imtiaz Ahmed, a professor of international relations at Dhaka University and a prominent political analyst here. He added, with a laugh, "Maybe in 20 or 30 years we'll know."

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2010/0722/Mutiny-in-Bangladesh-unsolved-mystery-threatens-regional-stability


Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail.
Sign-up now.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] ZIA'S FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THE MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY IN BANGLADESH



 
   A Military strongman illegally usurping civilian power after the gruesome mass murder of the civilian leader and
 his family is being held as the 'Savior' who ushered multiparty democracy in Bangladesh!  A known pychopath like our Ayi Bahar Mela via bdmailer via dhaka mailer and other kinds of mela is in charge of mailing this info.
        
            Read this column for an expose of the jaliyati ...
 
http://www.amadershomoy.com/content/2010/07/27/news0347.htm
 
           Farida Majid
================================


From: bdmailer@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:04:24 +0600
Subject: [ALOCHONA] ZIA'S FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THE MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY IN BANGLADESH

 
ZIA'S FIFTH AMENDMENT AND THE MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY IN BANGLADESH

Abid Bahar , Canada
abidbahar@yahoo.com

Hasina is poised to change the Fifth Amendment. People question, was Zia, A military Dictator or the Father of Bangladesh's Multiparty Democracy  in Bangladesh? Is Zia the Founder of Modern Bangladesh?

Link:
http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=299367

Bangabandu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman made the Fourth Amendment and President Ziaur Rahman made the Fifth Amendment is evident in the constitutional amendment bills. The Constitution (Fifth Amendment) Act was passed by the Jatiya Sangsad on 6 April 1979. This Act amended the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution by adding a new Paragraph which is # 18.

The changes:
(1) The expression ˜BISMILLAH-AR RAHMAN-AR-RAHIM™ was added before the Preamble of the Constitution.
(2) The expression ˜historic struggle for national liberation." in the Preamble was replaced by the expression a historic war for national independence.
(3) The one party BKSAL system was replaced by multiparty system. Newspaper freedom was restored.
(4) Fundamental principles of state policy were made as 'absolute trust and faith in the Almighty Allah, nationalism [Bangladeshi nationalism], democracy and socialism meaning economic and social justice.
 
President Ziaur Rahman a man (came from cantonment) came closer to his people by establishing the multi party democracy over BKSAL's one party system and allowed Hasina to enter in politics and he helped to bring order over chaos of Bangabandu's BKSAL.Bangabandu originally fought for democracy all his life but installed the BKSAL one party rule and banned all the opposition party newspapers.Here history tells us that one doesnt always have to be a military leader to become a, we see many of the presidents of USA and UK came from army career dictator and in the same was a civilian leader is not always democrat, as is the case of Bangabandu. Additionally. It is also true about some Russian leaders.

To me the interpretation that Ziaur Rahman (of Bangladesh, not Pakistan) was a dictator is wrong. Ziaur Rahman opened the multi party democratic process where he also helped open a political party. Thus the interpretation that Zia was a military dictator even we see repeated in the Daily Star columns is a distortion of history. It seems that such interpretation is based on the West Bengali and Indian Congress's xenophobic interpretation of South Asian history based on its false moral high ground where they see Bangladesh¨s political development necessarily follows developments similar to Pakistan. Certain AL analysts ignoring facts conveniently copy this type of misleading interpretation.
 
Further Readings::
(1) Abid Bahar, Zia, the Father of Modern Bangladesh
(2) Abid Bahar, Claims of Ownership, Politics of Vengeance and Anarchy in Bangladesh 




__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Economy passing to alien hands

My comments are inserted below.

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, "kg" <kgazi@...> wrote:
>
> It is not Alochoks who are saying "Economy passing to alien hands", the article says it is none but BGMEA and BKMEA, the topmost national Trade bodies, who are saying so.
>
> As organizations running the largest garment industry in the world, we can be rest assured that 'BGMEA & BKMEA' know more "economics" than a few alochoks.
>
> 1) In which "foreign hands" has China been in? China has NEVER been under foreign hands, and still is, the most protected economy in the world.
>
TURKMAN: When had I said, China was in Foreign Hands? I had said Chinese 'Economy' has been in Foreign Hands and proof is, until China permitted Western Industrialists to start building their factories, China's Foreign Exchange Earnings were near Zero. China has grown because of Foreign Factories and had started her Foreign Exchange Earnings because of them.
--------------
> 2) Yet, just last week China gave Bangladesh DUTY-FREE access to 4000 items that BD can export to China. That happened only 1-month after Hasina met China's PM.
>
TURKMAN: Because China has over $ 2 trillion already accumulated in Foreign Exchange Reserves.
--------
> 3) And after 38 years, India is still dragging its feet, dangling the carrot to BD, for making a single item duty-free from BD to India. All this SAARC junk that India cooks, to attract (and decieve) its neighbors is basically a FAARCE.
>
TURKMAN: India has only less than $ 300 billion in Surplus Earnings of Foreign Exchange. She does not want to lose them.
---------------
> 3) Meanwhile India exports $3.5 Billion to BD, while BD exports almost nothing to India. The 'trade deficit' to India for BD is $3.5B.
>
TURKMAN: This should stop and India should at least let us equal her exports to us.
--------------
> 4) In the whole world 'TRADE' means "Give & Take policy", but for India 'trade' means "Give & Give". You have to GIVE everything to India, give them business, transit, water, land, borders, Talpotti, Teen-Bigha, Farakka, Tipaimukh - the list goes on.
>
TURKMAN: Not right.
---------------
> 5) But what has India given to BD since 1971?
> Ans: a well-built security wall all around BD, and daily killings of BD citizens at India borders.
>
> Should alochoks NOT be concerned about the Economy passing to alien hands??
>
> K. Gazi
>
TURKMAN: India should not be stopping BD Emigre by Barrel of Gun. This is violation of UN Charter and BD should seek relief from UN on this.
> --------------------------------
>
>
> --- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, "ANDREWL" <turkman@> wrote:
> >
> > If Foreign Investments and building of factories in Bangladesh is being considered 'Economy passing to Alien hands', China's Economy has been in Foreign hands for last quarter century. Are the Foreigners running Communist China and she is not a free country?
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[ALOCHONA] War on Terror or War of Terror?

Right, right. Police in all countries also increases Crime so, all countries should ban Police.

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Isha Khan <bdmailer@...> wrote:
>
> Evidence Suggest U.S.-U.K. Wars Increase Global Terror Threat War on Terror
> or War of Terror?
>
> By ANTHONY DiMAGGIO
> Critical evidence from the British government and other sources suggest that
> the "War on Terror" has
>
> actually destabilized the Middle East and increased the terror threat
> throughout the globe. The former head of Britain's MI5 – Baroness
> Manningham-Buller – finds that the Iraq war has dramatically contributed to
> the growing terror danger as directed against the United Kingdom and its
> citizens. Britain has been forced to double the budget devoted to
> investigating terrorist plots following the 2003 invasion. An official
> British inquiry into the proposed invasion warned of just such an increase
> in the terror threat. This means that the destabilizing affects of Western
> attacks were predicted in advance of attacks that were seen as illegal under
> international law (as British Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg recently
> conceded) .
>
> Buller's confession is an admission that the war in Iraq has further
> inflamed anti-U.S. and anti-U.K. sentiment. When considering it along other
> critical studies, it looks as if the war has contributed to a greater
> hostility toward British foreign policy more generally among the majority of
> Middle Easterners, and among British nationals more specifically (Buller is
> most concerned with the latter group). She concludes that "a whole
> generation of young people" have been "radicalized' by what is perceived as
> an attack on Islam. The Blair administration, Buller states, conceded that
> the war increased the terror threat at home: the budget increases for
> anti-terror operations were "unheard of, certainly unheard of today, but he
> (Blair) and the Treasury and the chancellor accepted that because I was able
> to demonstrate the scale of the problem that we were confronted by." The
> growing threat to Britain seems all the more plausible in light of the 7/7
> 2005 terrorist bombings in London, which killed more than 50 civilians and
> were motivated by anger at the British invasion of Iraq.
>
> Buller concedes what should be known by most in the U.S. and U.K. today –
> the terror threat has grown in the wake of the Iraq invasion, despite the
> fact that Iraq posed no real national security threat to the West. Buller
> admits that MI5 had refused to contribute to the intelligence comprising the
> British government's dossier against Iraq's "WMD threat" in 2002. The
> reason is clear enough: there was "no credible evidence" that Iraq was
> linked to the 9/11 attacks, and Saddam Hussein was "unlikely" to support any
> attacks against the U.S. or U.K. unless his regime's survival was
> threatened. These conclusions were shared with the Bush administration at
> the time, and promptly ignored by a U.S. administration whose members had
> been set on going to war for more than 10 years.
>
> Buller also discusses a point well known among critics of U.S. foreign
> policy on the left: the invasion of Iraq has actually served as one of the
> best recruiters for Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, and loosely affiliated
> Islamist terror groups. As Buller describes with regards to U.S.-U.K.
> actions in Iraq: "Arguably, we gave Osama bin Laden his Iraqi jihad." In
> short, those throughout the Muslim world see the U.S.-allied occupation as
> motivated by imperial ambitions for oil; they see the torture and abuses in
> which American and British troops are responsible, and they are reacting
> critically. Targeting of U.S. and allied forces has become far more common
> now than it was prior to 9/11.
>
> Buller's MI5 based conclusions are not the first time it's been conceded
> that the "War on Terror" actually increases the global terror threat.
> Terrorism experts Peter Bergen and Paul Cruickshank found through their own
> statistical analysis that the 2003 invasion was accompanied by an "Iraq
> Effect" in which terrorist attacks escalated dramatically from 2003 to 2006
> (the time period when the study was conducted). More specifically, their
> report <http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17137.htm> finds
> that: "the rate of terrorist attacks around the world by jihadist groups and
> the rate of fatalities in those attacks increased dramatically after the
> invasion of Iraq. Globally there was a 607 percent rise in the average
> yearly incidence of attacks (28.3 attacks per year before and 199.8 after)
> and a 237 percent rise in the average fatality rate (from 501 to 1,689
> deaths per year). A large part of this rise occurred in Iraq, which accounts
> for fully half of the global total of jihadist terrorist attacks in the
> post-Iraq War period. But even excluding Iraq, the average yearly number of
> jihadist terrorist attacks and resulting fatalities still rose sharply
> around the world by 265 percent and 58 percent respectively." Subsequent
> empirical studies of the decline of violence in Iraq after 2007 demonstrated
> that the reduction came about, not because of the success of the "surge" in
> promoting humanitarianism, but because the ethnic cleansing in cities like
> Baghdad had essentially succeeded (with the help of U.S. troops disarming
> Sunni communities in the name of "counter-insurgency"), and with the Shia
> militias winning the civil war against Iraq's Sunnis (for more, see:
> http://www.juancole.com/2008/07/social-history-of-surge.html and
> dimaggio02272009.html <http://www.counterpunch.org/dimaggio02272009.html>).
> In short, violence declined because there were fewer people to kill
> following the successful ethnic cleansing.
>
> Additional journalistic investigation finds that the policy of torture and
> mistreatment at Guantanamo, in Iraq, and in Afghanistan (often directed
> against those whose terrorist ties were questionable to non-existent, but
> were nonetheless picked up in blanket raids in Afghanistan and Iraq) led to
> a further intensification of anti-U.S. sentiment in the Muslim world. As
> McClatchy Newspapers concluded in an eight month
> investigation<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2008/06/15/38773/day-1-americas-prison-for-terrorists.html#ixzz0uLC2CKXg>in
> 11 countries, U.S. detainees were often kept "on the basis of flimsy
> or
> fabricated evidence…McClatchy interviewed 66 released detainees, more than a
> dozen local officials in Afghanistan, and U.S. officials with intimate
> knowledge of the detention program...This unprecedented compilation shows
> that most of the 66 were low level Taliban grunts, innocent Afghan
> villagers, or ordinary criminals. At least seven had been working for the
> U.S. backed Afghan government and had no ties to militants…many of the
> detainees posed no danger to the U.S. or its allies".
>
> Through its investigations, McClatchy found that "prisoner mistreatment
> became a regular feature in cellblocks and interrogation rooms at Bagram and
> Kandahar air bases, the two main way stations in Afghanistan en route to
> Guantanamo…the investigation found that top Bush administration officials
> knew within months of opening the Guantanamo detention center that many of
> the prisoners there weren't `the worst of the worst,'" as "it was obvious
> [from military administrators] that at least a third of the population
> didn't belong there."
>
> American soldiers were often gullible in that they
> accepted<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2008/06/15/38773/day-1-americas-prison-for-terrorists.html#ixzz0uLCs7Dxl>"false
> reports passed along by informants and officials looking to settle
> old grudges in Afghanistan, a nation that had experienced more than two
> decades of occupation and civil war before U.S. troops arrived". The lack
> of connections of many detainees to any terror operations looks especially
> tragic in hindsight, considering that the torture visited upon these
> individuals contributed to their radicalization against the United States.
> As McClatchy reports, "U.S. detention policies fueled support for extremist
> Islamist groups. For some detainees who went home far more militant than
> when they arrived, Guantanamo became a school for jihad."
>
> The above evidence strongly suggests that the U.S. and U.K. primarily play a
> destabilizing role throughout the world, rather than fighting terrorism and
> ensuring world order out of chaos. Global public opinion polls have long
> found that most throughout the world view the U.S. as one of the primary
> threats to global security, rather than the protector of world order. These
> revelations are likely to elude many Americans, as the evidence above is not
> widely disseminated in the U.S. press. American journalists have long been
> content to uncritically repeat statements from liberal and conservative
> political officials (typically accompanied with no evidence) that the "War
> on Terror" must continue in order to keep America, its allies, and the
> Middle East "safe." In reality, though, the U.S. and U.K. are not fighting
> a War on Terror, but a War *of *Terror.
> *Anthony DiMaggio* is the editor of media-ocracy (www.media-ocracy.com), a
> daily online magazine devoted to the study of media, public opinion, and
> current events. He is the author of When Media Goes to
> War<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1583671994/counterpunchmaga>(2010)
> and Mass
> Media, Mass Propaganda<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0739119036/counterpunchmaga>(2008).
> He can be reached at:
> mediaocracy@...
>
> http://www.counterpunch.org/dimaggio07232010.html
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[ALOCHONA] Appellate Division's verdict published



FIFTH AMENDMENT
Appellate Division's verdict published
 
Dhaka, July 27 (bdnews24.com) -- The highest appeals court's verdict on two petitions, seeking to challenge the repeal of the Fifth Amendment to the constitution, has been published.

The six-member full bench of the Appellate Division, headed by former chief justice Mohammed Tafazzul Islam, published the verdict on Tuesday evening after a long meeting.

On Feb 2, the bench dismissed the petitions after six days of hearings that began on Jan 19.

It said in the rejection, "Petitions are dismissed with modification and observation."

Law minister Shafique Ahmed told reporters after that ruling that the order laid the foundation for reviving the spirit of the independence war which was at the core of the country's constitution.

Regarding the amendment to the constitution, he had said they would take measures after receiving the copy of the order.

The Fifth Amendment was meant to provide constitutional legitimacy to the governments in power — military or otherwise — following the 1975 assassination of the founding president Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.

But the High Court gave a ruling in August 2005, declaring the Fifth Amendment illegal, in response to a petition challenging the legality of the Martial Law Regulation of 1977.

In its ruling, the High Court declared illegal three regimes between August 15, 1975 and February 1979, headed by Khandaker Mushtaque Ahmed, Abu Sa'dat Mohammad Sayem and Ziaur Rahman.

The ruling exempted certain measures of those regimes initiated for public welfare. But the court in its judgment said all the changes in government from August 15, 1975 right up to the national elections of 1991 were unconstitutional.

The present Awami League-led government's withdrawal from a petition made by the previous BNP-led regime, against the High Court ruling, prompted the two petitions by BNP secretary general Khandaker Delwar Hossain and three pro-Jamaat-e-Islami lawyers last month.

The court said that by rejecting the two leave petitions, "We are completely disapproving military rule and stay of constitution. Those involved in these illegal acts should be trialled and criticised so that in the future, no over-eager or illegal power usurper can show the impudence to remove the people's constitution and the government they have elected.

It also said in the verdict, "Even though the parliament can implement a law for this, we are saying goodbye forever to all actions outside the constitution."


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] d hossain sayeedi a killer, terrorist!!!



listen from the following link
 



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

RE: [ALOCHONA] Amendment of constitution : secret agenda



 

        What 'secret' agenda and whose? It is funny to suggest that even questioning the illegal doctoring and destruction of a Constitution is some kind of 'agenda'.
 
         Can we have some other news resources besides those from the infamous propaganda machine owned by "Mishti-hasir Falu"?
 


From: bdmailer@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:31:30 +0600
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Amendment of constitution : secret agenda

 
Amendment of constitution : secret agenda
 




The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started.



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___