Biplab,
Did your read Taslima's writings?
Do you want your son read Taslima's saucy writings?
Do you want your daughter follow Taslima as a role
model?
If yes, then I applause thee!
I found Taslima's literature not only offensive, also
obtrusive for a constructive society. People like you
supporting Taslima acting as a villain for a
progressive society! You can build a sand-castle and
continue pursue your dream, but that dream will never
be a reality!
Whatever you believe, either an atheist or a believer,
it's one prerogative! I am not against your new fad of
'atheist' & 'secular' though I defer both!
Since Darwin's 'evolution hypothesis' - world has
thought to eradicate religion once for all. Even after
hundred years of Darwin's legacy, religion is still
alive!
I do not know your knowledge about 'atheism' or
'satanism' or 'secularism' - they are all different
label.
There is a reason why religion did not perish yet, and
parishioner still visits church - that's coming!
-- EOM
--- Dr Biplab Pal <
biplabpal2000@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Islamic Mind and Taslima
> -Biplab Pal,
> 12/3/2007
>
>
>
> So finally Mr Badrul Islam whose actual name is Anis
> Ahamed, employee of a civil right center in USA,
> cursed my son and wife!
>
>
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/vinnomot/message/14033> I am atheist-nor that I care for curse from an
> insane Islamic soul, but it presents me an
> opportunity to explain how a mind suffering from
> theist existentialism crisis resorts to such
> stupidity. Theist existentialism in this context
> means-- to him, Islam and his biological existence
> are not separate. I wrote to him a few days back
> that our biological religion is no different-we all
> want to raise good kids in good society. Perhaps, he
> didn't understand what I said.
>
> Point is-why this guy is against Taslima even when
> he works in a civil right department and Taslima is
> fighting for right of the women? Why instead of
> supporting Taslima's war for human right, his
> Islamic existence is forcing him to defend Islam ?
> We need to analyze that in depth.
> He is pointing at Taslima's lifestyle-Taslima
> wants to lead a life of fallen woman. And he thinks
> by supporting her, I am setting up a bad example to
> my son and to my wife and that they will be ruined
> because I am supporting an evil sexual morality when
> I am supporting Taslima! He also thinks, I have been
> admitted to USA for my Jehad against Islam ! He
> thinks everybody is like him---!!! Ok, I received
> permanent residency in USA in EB1 category (which
> has the highest priority for foreign nationals) as
> an outstanding researcher in Optical Technology.
> Civil right is not my profession but passion.
>
> Do I support Taslima's views on sexuality and
> family values? Not at all. I have written several
> articles to explain why we need strong family values
> from scientific angle.
>
>
>
http://www.vinnomot.com/test/editorial/biplab/Taniya.pdf>
http://www.vinnomot.com/BiplabPal/Kawan2.pdf>
http://www.vinnomot.com/BiplabPal/Bigganbad.pdf>
> In the past, I was in debate with my good atheist
> friend Avijit Roy on the issue of divorce—I have
> shown from research in sociology why divorce is
> unwanted if the family has kids. And I strongly
> pursue that value in my own family life.
>
> But still I will be the first one to protect
> Taslima from Muslim goons even if she writes for
> fallen women. A religion must be reformed. A society
> must be criticized without fear. The reason, America
> and West are doing far better—and that their moral
> standards are far better—and that their social
> organization is superior-is all because they allow
> criticism of all kinds. If I don't like her, let
> criticize her through writing. Reasons and logics
> are far stronger than swords and bombs of the goons.
>
> Will our women be inspired for adultery from her
> example?
> Will our girls be inspired to be fallen woman from
> her writing?
>
> This question needs very deep critical analysis.
> Our core existence is sexual-that is at the heart of
> our biological existence. If one can not handle
> his/her sexuality properly he/she will be ruined-and
> unproductive for the society. The reason, I will not
> be involved in adulterous behavior is not because I
> have religious values. I have none. Neither do I
> think there should be any punishment for adultery.
> But I will not do that for the simple reason—because
> as a biological existence, my first duty is to raise
> my kids as good citizen. If I am involved in
> adultery, a family conflict will evolve and that
> will ruin my kid's life-my most precious wealth. Not
> that I am not tempted for other women and sexual
> pleasure-I am very much inclined for that but still
> I will not do that because kids are far more higher
> priority for the biological existence of my genetic
> survival. It does not need any religion of ancient
> time with barbaric rules to stop adulterous
> behavior-a simple
> scientific understanding of objective of our life
> will do much better job.
>
> Best of luck for Badirul's family-although he cursed
> my son, I will bless his son since as a religious
> person he believes in blessings and curse. But more
> importantly, only a person of logic, honesty and
> reason can be successful on the earth. People with
> religious conviction are far less successful
> financially and as achiever. Once I asked my dad,
> what is that I have ever inherited from him? He
> coldly replied—if I can live a life of honest man, I
> did inherit from him or else, I inherited nothing. I
> guess, I will pass the same message to my son from
> his grandfather.
>
>
>
>
____________
______________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs