Banner Advertiser

Saturday, July 3, 2010

[ALOCHONA] Indian printer for National Curriculum &Text Book Board



Indian printer for National Curriculum &Text Book Board
 
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Law and order



Block highways, damage 200 vehicles
 
 
 
Thousands of locals in Gazipur yesterday vandalised over 200 vehicles, torched a garment factory and barricaded roads for hours--all on rumours that Rajuk was acquiring land to build a satellite town.

Hundreds of vehicles bound for northern districts and greater Mymensingh were stranded for around four hours on Dhaka bypass and Dhaka-Mymensingh highway.

The situation began improving at around 5:30pm when local Awami League lawmaker AKM Mozammel Haque announced the government has cancelled Rajuk's "satellite town project comprising three unions in Gazipur and parts of Tongi". Addressing a rally at Bhogra, he said, "The prime minister has assured that her government will do nothing against public interest."

After the announcement, the demonstrators left the rally venue in victory processions. Contacted, a Rajuk official said they do not even have any project named Gazipur Satellite Town.

Kamal Uddin Talukder, Gazipur deputy commissioner, expressed frustration at the movement over the so-called project. He said the way people behaved over a rumour was unacceptable.

Traffic movement on Dhaka-Mymensingh and Dhaka-Tangail highways got back to normal at 7:00pm. The Bhogra rally was organised by "all-party action committee", demanding cancellation of "satellite town project".

Gachha, Bason and Pubail union parishad chairmen and local AL and BNP leaders spoke at the rally. Leaders of the committee said the "project", if implemented, would have affected houses of around 10,000 families and many mills and factories.

The local administration deployed four magistrates and a huge contingent of police to avert untoward incidents during the rally that began at 4:30pm.The law enforcers however could not do much as rumours flew around inciting people to violence.

Things spiralled out of control at around 3:30pm as thousands of locals wielding bamboo sticks and bricks went on the rampage along a seven-kilometre stretch on Dhaka-Mymensingh highway.They damaged vehicles and blockaded the road with burning tires.

Few of the stranded buses and cars had their glasses intact. Panicked, passengers got off their vehicles and ran for safety.To make matters worse, workers of garment and other factories in the area joined the demonstrators.

As workers of Rose Knitting at Dhaka Bypass Road crossing did not participate in the agitation, locals got locked into a clash with them. They ransacked the factory building and set fire to it, said eyewitnesses.

Police said at least 50 people including 12 cops were injured in the clashes.Gazipur Fire Service units doused the flames at the garment factory.Rafiqul Islam, deputy assistant director of fire service, said two tin-shed houses were gutted.

http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=145279
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Quit cantt house to solve army housing problem



Quit cantt house to solve army housing problem
 
Hasina urges Khaleda
 
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina yesterday urged opposition leader Khaleda Zia to leave the disputed Dhaka Cantonment house and reside in her another allotted house in Gulshan as army officers currently facing acute accommodation crisis.

Addressing the inaugural session of extended meeting of Awami Swechhasebak League at Gono Bhaban, she said Khaleda Zia should not keep a vast piece of land occupied inside an area like cantonment."When our army officers are facing acute accommodation crisis, she is enjoying a vast land of 180 kathas inside the cantonment. Though she has been allotted a big house in Gulshan," Hasina said.

The PM said Khaleda Zia was given only one house by the cabinet at that time and that is in Gulshan on a 35 kathas of land. "How many houses does she need to live in?" the premier questioned.Strongly criticising the opposition for an "issueless" hartal on June 27, the premier said in fact, Khaleda Zia's party is announcing agitations like hartal just to keep possessed the cantonment house and to protect the illegal money and property that she has amassed through corruption.About the BNP's claim that Khaleda's cantonment house was given to her by the then president, the PM wondered as to how a president could allot a land of army in favour of a political person?

Hasina alleged that apart from the Gulshan house, Khaleda Zia has many other houses by her own name or undisclosed names. Meanwhile, reacting to the premier's request to her arch political rival Khaleda Zia to leave the Dhaka cantonment house, BNP lawmaker Barrister Moudud Ahmed said the matter is pending for disposal in the High Court.
"We've to wait till the court gives its verdict," he told UNB when asked to comment on PM Sheikh Hasina's remark.

Controversy over Khaleda Zia's staying in the cantonment house rose when the PM on April 1 last year in parliament asked Begum Zia to leave the house, making way for building apartments for the families of army officers killed in the Peelkhana carnage.

Later, a cabinet meeting on April 8 last year cancelled the lease of Khaleda's cantonment house.According to the government leasing rules, two houses cannot be allotted in favour of one person.Now the dispute over Khaleda's cantonment house is pending before the High Court after Khaleda Zia challenged the validity of an official letter asking her to vacate the house.
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Rights defenders demand independent inquiries



KILLING ALLEGEDLY BY POLICE
Rights defenders demand independent inquiries

Rights defenders on Saturday condemned the recent incidents of alleged killing in police custody and demanded independent investigations, rather than departmental inquiries, of the incidents.
   They expressed their reservations about the institution of the police committee to investigate the death of Mizanur Rahman, who the police claimed was killed in a 'gunfight' on Thursday but his family said was picked up by the police on Tuesday.
   The rights activists said such an investigation would not be impartial and acceptable. They made the statements after three incidents of killing allegedly in the custody of the Darussalam, Gulshan and Ramna police had taken place.
   Transport worker Mujibur Rahman was found dead in the River Turag at Mollartek on Friday morning after being picked up by plainclothesmen on Thursday night.
   The plainclothesmen picked him up when he was going to buy a football for his seven-year-old son Iqbal. Before taking him away, they beat Mujibur and dipped him in the river in front of the child.
   The police claimed businessman Mizanur Rahman was killed in 'gunfight' early Thursday but his wife Taslima Begum said the police had picked him on Tuesday morning and demanded money. As she failed to satisfy them, they shot him dead at night, she told reporters.
   Auto-rickshaw driver Babul Gazi died allegedly from severe beating in the custody of the Ramna police on June 28.
   Although the police on Saturday formed three committees to investigate the three incidents, the rights defenders doubted the impartiality and acceptability of such inquiries as the police were assigned investigation of allegations against their fellows.
   According to them, such an inquiry is against the principle of natural justice and also in violation of a High Court verdict.
   In the verdict, delivered in 1998 in the death reference and appeal regarding the rape and murder Yasmin, a housemaid who was raped and killed by three policemen on August 24, 1995 in Dinajpur, the High Court observed such allegations against the police should not be investigated by the police.
   The investigation by the police in a case, in which policemen are accused, is against the principle of natural justice and such cases need independent inquiries by a competent agency other than the police, the court observed.
   Former National Human Rights Commission chairman Justice Amirul Kabir Chowdhury has also repeatedly recommended that the government should carry out independent inquiries of each of the allegations of extrajudicial killing.
   On June 21, he iterated the recommendation, which he made on December 6, 2009, as the government has so far initiated such inquiry of only five such incidents.
   At a briefing at the commission launching its annual report towards the fag end of his tenure as chairman of the commission, Amirul Kabir said, 'Independent inquiries should be conducted for each of the incidents of extrajudicial killing as there are conflicting statements from law enforcers and families of the victims in most such cases.'
   'As an executive inquiry by a magistrate of such incidents of crossfire is not transparent, each of the incidents should be investigated by an independent inquiry committee of at least three members, composed of a government official not below the rank of deputy secretary, a police officer not below the rank of superintendent of police and a civil society personality of the choice of the victim's family,' he said.
   He came up with the recommendation on December 6, 2009 when he submitted the annual commission report to the president.
   Fawzia Karim Firoze, a member on the reconstituted National Human Rights Commission, on Saturday condemned the incidents of death in custody and said there should be independent inquiries in such cases. She also said the human rights commission should be involved in investigation of the incidents.
   'Such incidents are not expected at all. An independent inquiry should be carried to ascertain the truth and punish the persons responsible,' she said.
   The law minister, Shafique Ahmed, on Saturday said action would be taken against the policemen concerned if the accusations were proved.
   He made the comment on the sidelines of a workshop on 'Draft Laws for Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Educational Institutions and Workplace' organised by the Law Commission and the Bangladesh National Woman Lawyer's Association at the BRAC Inn in Dhaka.
   The state minister for home, Shamsul Haque Tuku, on Saturday told New Age, 'We have taken it seriously. The ministry will look into the incidents of killing allegedly by the police.'
   The police have already given its statements on the incidents and also initiated inquiries, he said.
   Asked whether the police inquiry of the incidents would be fair, he said the ministry would look into the allegations against the police as reported in the media.
   Such statements of the ministers, however, could not satisfy the rights defenders, who are gravely concerned about people's right to life as the law enforcers allegedly continue killing people in custody.
   Talking about the recent such incidents, jurist Shahdeen Malik said not only the Rapid Action Battalion but also the police had become killers. 'As apprehended, extrajudicial killing is becoming the norm of all types of law enforcement agencies. It will not be at all surprising that the police will hold an inquiry only to establish that the person killed was guilty,' he said.
   Rights group Odhikar secretary Adilur Rahman Khan saw the recurring incidents of death in custody as a result of the failure of the systems and the system would collapse if such failures could not be stopped now.
   'We could see only three cases of repression by the police through. There are court orders for independent inquiries and not to torture people in custody but nobody bothers them,' he said.
   'A human rights commission has been formed but we are yet to see any action,' he said.
   Writer Azfar Hussain demanded independent inquiries of the incidents. 'There remains a peculiar similarity between the Bangladesh's police system and the character of the state. A kind of fascism is in practice everywhere which results in victimisation of the common people.'
   Playwright Mamunur Rashid, also a rights defender, said it was not acceptable that the police would carry out investigation against policemen. 'I totally agree to the court ruling regarding such investigations.'
   'It is still matter of regret that the police could not be made humane. We expected that the police would act neutrally and humanely. But hopes have remained hopes.'
   Writer Shahriyar Kabir, also a rights activist, called for judicial inquiries of the killings. 'No departmental inquiry will be acceptable in such incidents. It is unfortunate killings in custody continue to take place. Successive governments have remained silent about such matters that tarnish Bangladesh's image abroad,' he said.
 

Three families, whose bread earners were killed allegedly in police custody in the span of a week, have urged the government to conduct impartial and independent inquiries to bring the perpetrators to book.
   The families said that the
    police who had killed their dear ones formed so-called probe committees in a bid to save the culprits.
   The Darussalam police recovered the body of transport worker Mujibur Rahman, 48, from the River Turag at Baghbari on the fringe of Dhaka on Friday morning but his family claimed the victim was picked up by police on Thursday evening.
   On June 1, a businessman Mizanur Rahman, 35, was killed in a 'gunfight' between the police and crime suspects at Gulshan but his family said the police had picked him up two days before the killing.
   On June 28, CNG-run three-wheeler driver Babul Gazi, 40, was killed allegedly in the custody of Ramna police and his family alleged the police had killed him after he refused to pay them bribe. The police said they suspected Babul had been involved in CNG-run auto lifting and that a case had been filed against him.
   One could be involved in wrongdoing like mugging or car lifting, but how is it possible that he is killed in police custody in a civilised society, the relatives of the victims' families told New Age on Saturday.
   When approached, Gulshan, Ramna and Darussalam police stations failed to produce any evidence to prove that there were serious allegations or cases of crime against the slain persons.
   The officer-in-charge of Darussalam police station, Abdul Malek, on Saturday told New Age locals believed slain Mujibur Rahman was a drug peddler and that the police were looking into whether there were any other allegations against him. But Mujibur's neighbours disputed the claims saying that they knew him as a drug addict but never found him involved in drug peddling.
   Darussalam police said they had earlier on June 10 arrested Mujib on charge of drug addiction and he was released on bail.
   The victim's father Ibrahim alleged that at time the police had demanded Tk 20,000 and he was released on payment of Tk 7,000.
   In the face of mounting protests against the alleged killings in custody, particularly by the rights activist and media, Dhaka Metropolitan Police formed separate committees to investigate the three incidents and asked them to submit reports in 10 days.
   The police claimed that the reports carried by the media about the incidents were 'exaggerated' and 'not based on facts.'
   Demanding punishment of the culprits, Shuvo Akter, widow of Babul Gazi said, 'My family is ruined after my husband's killing…He was killed by police after torture and I want justice.'
   The locals at Darussalam alleged that the police were extorting money regularly from small traders after detaining them or threatening them with dire consequences.
   Ibrahim said he believed Darussalam police had beaten his son to death as five men, including sub-inspectors Hekmat Ali and Moshiur and assistant sub-inspector Billal and their informants – Muhibul and Kajal – picked up the victim while he was returning to his house at Baghbari in the area along with his son Iqbal Hossain, 8, on Thursday evening and since then he had been missing.
   Iqbal Hossain said that he saw some people handcuff his father and beat him up when he reached Melartek Ghat.
   'My father was tied with a rope around his neck and struck repeatedly with a pistol,' Iqbal said.
   The police arrested Muhibul and Kajal in this connection after a case was filed by the victim's father on Friday and a Dhaka Court granted two-day remand for them.
   In Madda Badda, from where Mizan was picked up early Tuesday and later killed allegedly in a gunfight, the locals said that the police were extorting money from small traders regularly and threatening them on refusal.
   The locals in the afternoon brought out a rally demanding punishment of Mizan's killers.
   On March 9, businessman Zakir Hossain, 45, who was picked up on charges of car lifting, was killed allegedly in police custody.


'Crossfire' continues
HC rule hearing not in sight

 

The law enforcers continue killing people in extrajudicial incidents such as 'crossfire' in defiance of the ban the High Court imposed on December 14, 2009 as the hearing in a number of HC rules issued regarding such killing is still not in sight.
   Forty-four people have so far been killed in such incidents of extrajudicial killing since December 14, 2009, when the High Court asked the authorities not to kill any more people in 'crossfire' or 'encounter' until it hears the rule it issued suo moto on the government in this regard on November 17, 2009.
   The bench of Justice AFM Abdur Rahman and Justice Md Emdadul Haque Azad issued the rule suo moto on the government asking it to explain why the killing of two brothers in Rapid Action Battalion custody in 'crossfire' on November 16, 2009 in Madaripur would not be declared illegal.
   The same bench on December 14, 2009 asked the authorities not to kill any more people in the name of 'crossfire,' 'encounter' or 'gunfight' until it hears the rule over the extrajudicial killing. It also said the rule would come up for hearing on January 11 as the attorney general on December 14, 2009 sought time for the hearing.
   The hearing in the rule became uncertain as the chief justice on January 7 reshuffled the High Court benches posting Justice AFM Abdur Rahman and Justice Md Emdadul Haque Azad who issued the rule to separate benches.
   The attorney general, Mahbubey Alam, recently told New Age, 'The government has nothing to do with the hearing, which now depends on the chief justice.'
   Asked whether the bench that issued the rule could hear the matter, the attorney general said, 'I do not know whether the chief justice will assign the same bench the hearing in the rule considering it a "part-heard" matter.'
   'The reconstitution of the High Court benches has sent the matter into deep freeze,' said Ruhul Quddus Babu, counsel for the Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust who has become party to the case as intervener.
   'Now,' he said, 'the hearing in the rule depends on the will of the chief justice.'
   He also said the rule should be heard immediately as the law enforcers, who had stopped extrajudicial killing after the December 14 High Court rule, again started killing people in the name of 'crossfire' or 'encounter.'
   After the December 14 ban on 'crossfire,' no person had been killed by the law enforcers in such incidents till January 9.
   The law enforcers first came up with such extrajudicial killing on January 9 two days after the hearing in the rule had became uncertain because of the reshuffle of the High Court benches.
   The latest incident of 'encounter' death at Gulshan in Dhaka on July 1 took to 199 the total number of death in extrajudicial incidents called 'crossfire,' 'encounter' or 'gunfight' since the Awami League-led government assumed office on January 6, 2009.
   The government, on the other hand, is yet to reply to the rules the High Court had issued much earlier asking it to explain why extrajudicial killings by law enforcers in the name of 'crossfire' or 'encounter' would not be declared illegal.
   The bench of Justice Syed Mahmud Hossain and Justice Quamrul Islam Siddiqui, on June 29, 2009 issued the rule after hearing a public interest litigation writ petition filed by rights organisations Ain o Salish Kendra, Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust and Karmajibi Nari challenging the legality of extrajudicial killing.
   Ain o Salish Kendra counsel Saifur Rashid said, 'As the government is yet to reply to the rule, we are trying to get the rule heard as soon as possible.'
   The High Court first came up with a ruling on extrajudicial killing on May 25, 2006.
   In the ruling, the bench of Justice M Awlad Ali and Justice Zinat Ara asked the government to explain why the reported killing of Tunda Ismail, who was in fetters in police custody, should not be properly investigated and why the perpetrators should not be brought to justice.
   Tunda Ismail, shown arrested in an arms case and remanded in police custody for interrogation, was killed in 'crossfire,' as claimed by the police, at Lalbagh on May 22, 2006.
   The bench of Justice Syed Muhammad Dastagir Husain and Justice Mamnoon Rahman on August 6, 2006 issued a rule asking the government and the Rapid Action Battalion to explain why they should not be directed to ensure the security of the people detained in their custody.
   The court issued the order after hearing a public interest litigation writ petition filed by rights organisation Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh, which sought the court's directive on the government and the battalion to protect the life of any one detained from being killed in 'crossfire' or 'encounter.'
   Although the government had already replied to the August 6, 2006 rule, the case is yet to be disposed of, the rights group's counsel Manzill Murshid said.

http://www.newagebd.com/2010/jul/04/front.html



__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

[ALOCHONA] Indian tribesmen continue incursion into Bangladesh



Indian tribesmen continue incursion into Bangladesh

July 2: Indian Khashia's continued tilling cropland inside Bangladesh backed by BSF with heavy arms at Shreepur near Jaintapur border in Sylhet with reinforced manpower for the ninth consecutive day today.(The Independent)

Sources in the Bangladesh Rifles said that the Indian Khasia tribesmen started tilling cropland today at Alubagan, some 300 metres inside the Bangladesh territory near the Shreepur BDR outpost, as well as at Minartila and Kathalbari in the area where the BSF men backed them with heavy arms.

Three groups of Indian Khasia tribesmen, entered Alubagan, Minartila and Kathalbari in Shreepur area inside Bangladesh territory today. The Indian peasants were armed with bows and arrows as well as firearms, local sources said.

The Khasias entered Bangladesh without paying heed to protest from BDR who warned them not to trespass and plough land inside Bangladesh territory.

Local people claimed that the Indians were working on the cropland inside Bangladesh over the day. 'We warned the Indian nationals several times by blowing whistles and hanging flags, but they did not pay heed to our repeated protests,' a BDR official at Minartila checkpoint under Shreepur outpost, said.

The 21 Rifles Battalion commandant officer lieutenant colonel Khandakar Zahirul Alam told The Independent this afternoon that he had talked several times to officers of the Indian border security force over the issue. 'But the BSF officials said they had no mandate to ask their countrymen to stop tilling their own land,' Zahirul Alam said, adding that the higher authorities of the Bangladesh border guards were aware of the border situation.
 


__._,_.___


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___