Banner Advertiser

Sunday, March 12, 2017

[mukto-mona] Press Release> Please publish



বঙ্গবন্ধু পরিষদ শুক্রবার জাতির জনক 

বঙ্গবন্ধুর জন্মদিন পালন করবে

১৭ই মার্চ জাতির জনক বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমান-এর জন্মদিন। যুক্তরাষ্ট্র বঙ্গবন্ধু পরিষদ যথাযোগ্য মর্যাদায় দিনটি পালনের সিদ্ভান্ত নিয়েছে। এ উপলক্ষ্যে এই শুক্রবার ১৭ই মার্চ ২০১৭ সন্ধ্যা ৭টায় জ্যামাইকার ষ্টার কাবাব (১৬৮-২১, হিলসাইড এভিনিউ) এক অনুষ্টানের আয়োজন করা হয়েছে। এতে কেক কেটে জাতির জনকের জন্মদিন পালন করা হবে এবং জাতির জনকের জীবন নিয়ে এক 'খোলামেলা আলোচনা'-এর ব্যবস্থা করা হয়েছে। সকল বঙ্গবন্ধু ভক্ত ও অনুসারীদের এতে উপস্থিত থাকার জন্যে অনুরোধ জানান হয়েছে। ধন্যবাদ।

ড: নুরুন নবী, সভাপতি

শিতাংশু গুহ, সাধারণ সম্পাদক।

ফাহিম রেজা নূর এবং স্বীকৃতি বড়ুয়া। 



__._,_.___

Posted by: Sitangshu Guha <guhasb@gmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Re: MUJIB'S 7TH MARCH SPEECH, NEGOTIATION, SURRENDER AND DEATH



This is a little better. A sense of respectivity is civility.  Pulling some one down from respect does not harm him/her who are already placed in respect. Such huge as Mr. Bhashani. Only those, who habitually use disrespectful words, reduces to nothing.



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 12/03/2017 9:48 AM (GMT+08:00)
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Re: MUJIB'S 7TH MARCH SPEECH, NEGOTIATION, SURRENDER AND DEATH

 

The question is rather what Maulana did for Bangladeshi independence with his weak political clout and followings. Why should we put him on the same pedestal with Mujib? Why Bashani's intention should be grabbing the power when he could not even get more than handful parliamentary seats? I do not see any of his political campaigns leading to Bangladeshi independence. That was my point.















On Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:57 AM, "Mohammad Mushrafi mushrafi@hotmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
It is really a psychological peoblem of few so called "intelectuals". They sharpens their tongue to sting people, policies and ideas randomly. Its a strongly negative attitude with ugly habit of undermining others without any base. 

Mr.Bhashani was a historic personality who had no no intention to grab power. He lived very plainly and spoke for the interest of the people and nation. He mobilized long March against Farrakka barrage, he organised vital political dialogue "Kagmari Conference". 

The people with ill intentions always tries to sting others for no apparent reason. They are simply ill in psyche. 




Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "DeEldar shahdeeldar@gmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 11/03/2017 7:25 AM (GMT+08:00)
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Post Card <abahar.canada@gmail.com>, Jalal Khan <jukhan@gmail.com>, Zoglul Husain <zoglul@hotmail.co.uk>, RANU CHOWDHURY <ranu51@hotmail.com>, rashed Anam <rashedanam1971@gmail.com>, Mohamed Nazir <nazir0101@gmail.com>, Mohammad Gani <mgani69@gmail.com>, Mina Farah <farahmina@gmail.com>, Farida Hossain <druhfarida@gmail.com>, "Dr. KMA Malik" <kmamalik15@gmail.com>, New England Bnp <bnp.newengland@yahoo.com>, Bangla Press <banglapress@gmail.com>, Bangladesh Nationalist Party <bnp.canada2011@gmail.com>, mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, M.JamalGhaus@gmail.com
Subject: [mukto-mona] Re: MUJIB'S 7TH MARCH SPEECH, NEGOTIATION, SURRENDER AND DEATH

 
There is no comparison between a clout-less illiterate Maulana and a struggle-hardened Mujib. While Mujib had the voters' mandate to rule, Maulana had no political power base at all except some negligible voters' support like communists and NAP parties were having at that time. People did not even vote for that poor guy. So, what Bhasani said or did was basically irrelevant to Bangladeshi independence. It was Mujib, who was courteous enough to make some space for Maulana and welcomed him to the liberation movement. Make no mistake that his absence during the liberation time would not have changed the history. Accrording to Yahya's affidavit, Bhasani's stance was rather dubious about Bangladeshi independence. He was overtly very friendly to Yahya junta and wanted to accommodate dictator's wish for an intact Pakistan. Bluntly put, the man was not a trustworthy politician. He wanted to be a communist in a Maulana garb but did not know much about real communism.
    





On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Post Card <abahar.canada@gmail.com> wrote:
MUJIB'S 7TH MARCH SPEECH, NEGOTIATION, SURRENDER AND DEATH
Abid Bahar

Mujib's 7th March speech has been hailed by members of Mujib cult as the declaration of independence. A careful examination of the speech shows
something different from what is projected for people's consumption.Although on 7th March, Mujib made a good deliberation but research shows, it
 was only an" If Speech" (Jodi Akta Goli Pora). It was not much different from Maulana Bhasani's "if speech." The latter saying if autonomy demand wasn't accepted, then "Assalamu Alikum" meaning goodbye that is independence. 

Surprisingly, what BKSALITe overenthusists Mujib worshippers are making of the speech was not seen in newspapers after the speech. On the other hand newspapers reported people's frustration for not declaring independence. Then the worst happened. The hypocrite Mujib negotiated with the enemy to save Pakistan.then as the top leader of the country even motivated by his self interest of safety for himself
 and his family even voluntarily surrendered to the enemy, making him the greatest betrayer of all times. Upon his return from
Pakistan, he should have been arrested as a razakar and like Golam Azam who was also known as the  "Bhasha Sainik," Mujib the razakar #1 and
Hasina the razakar #2 should have been tried by the court for treason. Mujib wasn't killed by the Pakistani army but died in the hand of freedom fighters.

Today, Hasina carries the burden of Mujib's razakar legacy, lately she removed from the museum Zia's medal of valor at the liberation war . This move by Hasina  says a lot. that Hasina's "Mukti Juddher Chatona" is in disguise the razakar #2's  fight against this brave Mukti juddha. It says more when we see Hasina is selling Bangladesh to India for "one dollar" what we had earned in exchange for huge pool of blood.

In not understanding Mujibbadi fascism, and not taking proper nonviolent measures, today, through Indian puppetry, Mujibbadi extremism is growing leaps and bound because it remained unabated. The Mujibbadi hero-worshippers lately even made a law for jail terms to people criticize Mujib. In this latest fascist measure, surely freedom of speech by historians taken away.

Surely, freedom struggle against fascism and razakarism still continues.
--
--
Disclaimer: All content provided on this discussion forum is for informational purposes only. The owner of this forum makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.
This policy is subject to change at anytime.

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bangladesh Progressives" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bangladesh-progressives+unsubs cribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op tout.





__._,_.___

Posted by: Mohammad Mushrafi <mushrafi@hotmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] বঙ্গবন্ধুর খুনিকে ফেরত পাঠান, ট্রুডোকে বাংলাদেশি কিশোরী



Hi Sam, are you the representative of Canada govt.? Do not be negative.
Let the truth speak by a little Canadian. Keep your passimism off. The world is changing. The court order after rigorous trial be executed. 



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Sam Bain subain1@yahoo.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 12/03/2017 11:38 PM (GMT+08:00)
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] বঙ্গবন্ধুর খুনিকে ফেরত পাঠান, ট্রুডোকে বাংলাদেশি কিশোরী

 

A young girl's appeal or not, Canada is unlikely to send a death-sentence convict to have his sentence executed. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 11, 2017, at 20:42, 'Jamal G. Khan' M.JamalGhaus@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

বঙ্গবন্ধুর খুনিকে ফেরত পাঠান, ট্রুডোকে বাংলাদেশি কিশোরী

নিজস্ব প্রতিবেদক, ঢাকাটাইমস| প্রকাশিত : ১১ মার্চ ২০১৭, ২৩:৩১

কানাডায় পালিয়ে থাকা জাতির জনক বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের আত্মস্বীকৃত খুনি নুর চৌধুরীকে বাংলাদেশে ফেরত পাঠাতে কানাডার প্রধানমন্ত্রী জাস্টিন ট্রুডোকে চিঠি লিখে অনুরোধ করেছে এক বাংলাদেশি কানাডিয়ান কিশোরী।

<image.png>চিঠিতে কানাডার প্রধানমন্ত্রী জাস্টিন ট্রুডোর দৃষ্টি আকর্ষণ করে বাংলাদেশি কিশোরী মাশকুরা তাবাসসুম তাথৈ লিখেছে, বাংলাদেশের জাতির জনক বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমান এর আত্মস্বীকৃত খুনি নুর চৌধুরী কানাডাকে তার নিরাপদ আশ্রয় বানিয়ে ফেলেছে। গত ২১ বছর ধরে বঙ্গবন্ধুর আত্মস্বীকৃত খুনি ও হত্যা মামলায় সাজাপ্রাপ্ত নুর চৌধুরী টরেন্টোতে নির্ঝঞ্ঝাট জীবন যাপন করছে। কানাডার মতো একটি দেশ নুর চৌধুরীর মতো আত্মস্বীকৃত খুনির নিরাপদ আবাসস্থল হতে পারে না।

কানাডায় 'রিফিউজি স্ট্যাটাস' আবেদন করে প্রত্যাখ্যাত, এমনকি ডিপোর্টেশন আদেশ মোকাবেলা করার পরেও কানাডা থেকে নুর চৌধুরীকে আইনি কারণে বহিষ্কার করা যাচ্ছে না। অন্য কোন দেশে ফেরত গেলে ফাঁসির সাজা ভোগ করতে পারেন, এমন কোনো ব্যক্তি কানাডা ভ্রমণে আসলে, নিজে উদ্যোগী হয়ে না ফেরত গেলে, তাকে সরকার জোর করে ফেরত পাঠাতে পারবে না মর্মে ২০০১ সালে কানাডার সুপ্রিম কোর্ট যে রায় দিয়েছিল, তারই সুফল ভোগ করছে বঙ্গবন্ধুর খুনি নুর চৌধুরী।

কানাডার অভিবাসন এবং উদ্বাস্তু মন্ত্রণালয় ইতোমধ্যে চারবার নুর চৌধুরীর দরখাস্ত নামঞ্জুর করেছে।

তাথৈ লিখেছে, 'অন্যদের মতো আমিও আশায় বুক বেঁধে আছি, মানবতাবিরোধী অপরাধ করা নুর চৌধুরীকে অচিরেই বাংলাদেশে ফেরত পাঠানো হবে, যাতে করে সে তার সাজা ভোগ করতে পারে। ২০০৯ সালে বাংলাদেশের সুপ্রিম কোর্ট বঙ্গবন্ধু এবং তাঁর পরিবারের সদস্যদের হত্যার দায়ে নুর চৌধুরীসহ আরও ১১জনের বিরুদ্ধে ফাঁসির আদেশ দেয়। আসামিদের অনেকের ফাঁসির রায় কার্যকর করা হয়েছে। নুর চৌধুরীকে দেশে ফেরত পাঠানো হলে এক্ষেত্রেও ন্যয়বিচার প্রতিষ্ঠা পাবে বলে আমি বিশ্বাস করি'।

তাথৈ প্রধানমন্ত্রী জাস্টিন ট্রুডোকে তার বাবা ই ট্রুডোর কথা মনে করিয়ে দিয়ে লিখেছে- '১৯৭০ সালে নির্বাচনের পরে তৎকালীন পাকিস্তানে বেসামরিক শক্তির হাতে ক্ষমতা হস্তান্তরের পক্ষে ছিলেন আপনার বাবা। ১৯৭১ সালে পাকিস্তানী সেনাবাহিনী ও তাদের স্থানীয় দোসরদের দ্বারা সংঘটিত গণহত্যার তীব্র নিন্দা জানিয়েছিলেন আপনার বাবা। এমনকি পাকিস্তানে অস্ত্র রপ্তানির ওপরও নিষেধাজ্ঞা জারি করেছিলেন তিনি'।

আমরা সবাই জানি, এ বছর কানাডা কনফেডারেশনের ১৫০তম বার্ষিকী উদযাপন করবে। আমাদের আশা, বঙ্গবন্ধুর খুনি নুর চৌধুরীকে বাংলাদেশে ফেরত পাঠিয়ে আপনি ২০১৭ সালকে চিরস্মরণীয় করে রাখবেন।'

মাশকুরা তাবাসসুম তাথৈ (১৪) নামের এই বাংলাদেশি কানাডিয়ান কিশোরী বর্তমানে ম্যাপল রিজ স্কুলের গ্রেড-৮ এর ছাত্রী এবং স্কুলের ছাত্র সংসদের বর্তমানে নির্বাচিত প্রধানমন্ত্রী হিসেবে কাজ করছে।

২০১২ সালের ২৮ আগস্ট গ্রেড-৪ এর ছাত্রী থাকা অবস্থায় তাথৈ তার আব্বা আম্মার সঙ্গে বাংলাদেশ থেকে কানাডায় পাড়ি জমায়। ২০১৬ সালে তাথৈ তার সাবেক স্কুল অটোয়া এমিলি কার মিডল স্কুলের ব্র্যান্ড অ্যাম্বাসেডর হিসেবে কাজ করেছে। ফরেস্ট ভ্যালি ইলিমেন্টারি স্কুল এ গ্রেড-ফাইভ পড়াকালীন সে স্টুডেন্ট কাউন্সিল এর নির্বাচিত প্রেসিডেন্ট হিসেবেও কাজ করেছে। ভবিষ্যতে একজন আইনজীবী এবং রাজনীতিবিদ হিসেবে মানুষের জন্য কাজ করতে চায় তাথৈ।

ঢাকাটাইমস/১১মার্চ/এসএএফ/ইএস)

http://www.dhakatimes24.com/2017/03/11/23744/বঙ্গবন্ধুর-খুনিকে-ফেরত-পাঠান-ট্রুডোকে-বাংলাদেশি-কিশোরী
 
রবিবার, ১২ মার্চ ২০১৭, ০৮:৪২ (রাত)






 




__._,_.___

Posted by: Mohammad Mushrafi <mushrafi@hotmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering



Farida Majid is known to attempt to divert attention from one thing to the other. Even that attempt is almost always flawed. Here is another example.
What a bunch of rubbish, these women are presenting, against the executive order, which, among other things, highlights the violation of women's rights in the predominantly Muslim countries.

Notice, who are complaining about an executive order that barely highlights the women's right issues? It's these women. They don't like that a man has executed the order.  This is the sexist feminism, which is ruining legitimate women's right movement.  

Think about - who violate women's right. Must be men, right? So, it is men, who need to change attitudes towards women. So, if a man signs such an order, it should be welcome by women. Then, what are these ladies complaining about?  

They are also complaining about that, a man who once talked trash about some women in the past should not sign such an order. You tend to forget, just talking about something is not a crime, and, allegation is not a conviction of a crime in the USA.

Ladies, the most appropriate person to sign such an order should be the one, who you are accusing of being a violator of women's right. So, get your thoughts in order. You are not making sense here.

Pat

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Shah Deeldar shahdeeldar@yahoo.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

Not sure whether you got a schizophrenic brain or not.... but you love to change the topic without writing any opinion of your own. Did you watch the video? Or, it was a conscious intention to change the subject and get onto another of your pet subject? Even then, you do not write anything substantive of your own but borrow other white men' articles and opinions to advance your own opinion. But then, you foul mouth others to be followers of white men' lines? Do you understand your grand hypocrisy? Can you put forward a simple opinion about the subject? I guess not!




On Sunday, March 12, 2017 11:39 AM, "Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
May be our mukto-mona fans of Donald Trump, who are the all-knowing  সবজান্তা  -- and "Oh what a good 'white' Male I am inside my brown skin!" should take note how some of the other citizens think ........

hen President Trump signed his first executive order in January to temporarily ban refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim nations, he said it was needed, in part, to protect women. A little-noticed part of the executive order reads, "The United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred, including 'honor' killings, other forms of violence against women." Some observers have noticed the irony in the executive order. Both the man who signed the order, Donald Trump, and the man who drafted the order, his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, have in the past been accused of committing violence against women. During the presidential campaign, Trump famously boasted about sexually assaulting women and grabbing them "by the pussy," in a leaked video recorded by NBC's "Access Hollywood." Eight women have now come forward and accused Donald Trump of sexual assault and harassment. And Trump is not alone. Stephen Bannon was charged with domestic violence and battery in 1996. Trump's first pick to be labor secretary, fast-food giant CEO Andrew Puzder, was accused of domestic abuse by his ex-wife, who even went on "Oprah" in disguise to speak about domestic violence. For more, we turn to a recent Democracy Now! interview with Eve Ensler, playwright, author of "The Vagina Monologues," and Christine Schuler Deschryver, director of V-Day Congo.
 
Excerpt: How is it possible that a nation of people felt OK with electing a self-confessed sexual assaulter?





From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Dristy Pat dristypat5@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 7:01 AM
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering
 
 
These people really know how to waste time on something that is, simply, not so important in a political success. They are trying to figure out why Donald Trump has been elected by the people in the USA in spite of his many false statements in the past. They are asking - if truth matter, at all, in a political election. They seem to be scratching heads to solve this dilema.

First, we must recognize, political leaders are not spiritual leaders. As a result, the success or failure of a politician does not depend on how much truthful he/she has been in the past.  Political success solely depends on politicians stand on policies that matter in the life of ordinary people. If policies are good, people will not hesitate to vote for someone with many personal flaws. That's exactly what happened to the success of Donald Trump.

Associating truthfulness to a political success is a misguided notion. It will only divert attention away from what really matter in the political success. I am sure, listeners will go home with a misguided take home message from this debate. All in all, it's a biased an anti-Trump debating platform.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, DeEldar shahdeeldar@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
Established media, social media, truth, half truth and post truth! It covers all! Enjoy!






__._,_.___

Posted by: Dristy Pat <dristypat5@gmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering



Not sure whether you got a schizophrenic brain or not.... but you love to change the topic without writing any opinion of your own. Did you watch the video? Or, it was a conscious intention to change the subject and get onto another of your pet subject? Even then, you do not write anything substantive of your own but borrow other white men' articles and opinions to advance your own opinion. But then, you foul mouth others to be followers of white men' lines? Do you understand your grand hypocrisy? Can you put forward a simple opinion about the subject? I guess not!




On Sunday, March 12, 2017 11:39 AM, "Farida Majid farida_majid@hotmail.com [mukto-mona]" <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
May be our mukto-mona fans of Donald Trump, who are the all-knowing  সবজান্তা  -- and "Oh what a good 'white' Male I am inside my brown skin!" should take note how some of the other citizens think ........

hen President Trump signed his first executive order in January to temporarily ban refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim nations, he said it was needed, in part, to protect women. A little-noticed part of the executive order reads, "The United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred, including 'honor' killings, other forms of violence against women." Some observers have noticed the irony in the executive order. Both the man who signed the order, Donald Trump, and the man who drafted the order, his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, have in the past been accused of committing violence against women. During the presidential campaign, Trump famously boasted about sexually assaulting women and grabbing them "by the pussy," in a leaked video recorded by NBC's "Access Hollywood." Eight women have now come forward and accused Donald Trump of sexual assault and harassment. And Trump is not alone. Stephen Bannon was charged with domestic violence and battery in 1996. Trump's first pick to be labor secretary, fast-food giant CEO Andrew Puzder, was accused of domestic abuse by his ex-wife, who even went on "Oprah" in disguise to speak about domestic violence. For more, we turn to a recent Democracy Now! interview with Eve Ensler, playwright, author of "The Vagina Monologues," and Christine Schuler Deschryver, director of V-Day Congo.
 
readersupportednews.org
Excerpt: How is it possible that a nation of people felt OK with electing a self-confessed sexual assaulter?





From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Dristy Pat dristypat5@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 7:01 AM
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering
 
 
These people really know how to waste time on something that is, simply, not so important in a political success. They are trying to figure out why Donald Trump has been elected by the people in the USA in spite of his many false statements in the past. They are asking - if truth matter, at all, in a political election. They seem to be scratching heads to solve this dilema.

First, we must recognize, political leaders are not spiritual leaders. As a result, the success or failure of a politician does not depend on how much truthful he/she has been in the past.  Political success solely depends on politicians stand on policies that matter in the life of ordinary people. If policies are good, people will not hesitate to vote for someone with many personal flaws. That's exactly what happened to the success of Donald Trump.

Associating truthfulness to a political success is a misguided notion. It will only divert attention away from what really matter in the political success. I am sure, listeners will go home with a misguided take home message from this debate. All in all, it's a biased an anti-Trump debating platform.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, DeEldar shahdeeldar@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
Established media, social media, truth, half truth and post truth! It covers all! Enjoy!





__._,_.___

Posted by: Shah Deeldar <shahdeeldar@yahoo.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Fwd: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering




Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering
To: Farida Majid <farida_majid@hotmail.com>


Ms. Majid,
What a bunch of rubbish, you women are presenting here, against the executive order, which, among other things, highlights the violation of women's rights in the predominantly Muslim countries.

You are complaining about an executive order that barely highlights the women's right issues. You don't like that a man has executed the order.  This is the sexist feminism, which is ruining the legitimate women's right movement.  

Think about - who violate women's right. Must be men, right? So, it is men, who need to change attitudes towards women. So, if a man signs such an order, it should be welcome by women. Then, what are you ladies complaining about? I believe you have other issues (not women's rights) with this order,  right?  

You are also complaining about that, a man who once talked trash about some women in the past should not sign such an order. They tend to forget, just talking about something is not a crime, and, allegation is not a conviction of a crime, in the USA.

Ladies, the most appropriate person to sign such an order should be the one, who you are accusing of being a violator of women's right. So, get your thoughts in order. You are not making sense here.

Pat   


On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Farida Majid <farida_majid@hotmail.com> wrote:

May be our mukto-mona fans of Donald Trump, who are the all-knowing  সবজান্তা  -- and "Oh what a good 'white' Male I am inside my brown skin!" should take note how some of the other citizens think ........


hen President Trump signed his first executive order in January to temporarily ban refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim nations, he said it was needed, in part, to protect women. A little-noticed part of the executive order reads, "The United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred, including 'honor' killings, other forms of violence against women." Some observers have noticed the irony in the executive order. Both the man who signed the order, Donald Trump, and the man who drafted the order, his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, have in the past been accused of committing violence against women. During the presidential campaign, Trump famously boasted about sexually assaulting women and grabbing them "by the pussy," in a leaked video recorded by NBC's "Access Hollywood." Eight women have now come forward and accused Donald Trump of sexual assault and harassment. And Trump is not alone. Stephen Bannon was charged with domestic violence and battery in 1996. Trump's first pick to be labor secretary, fast-food giant CEO Andrew Puzder, was accused of domestic abuse by his ex-wife, who even went on "Oprah" in disguise to speak about domestic violence. For more, we turn to a recent Democracy Now! interview with Eve Ensler, playwright, author of "The Vagina Monologues," and Christine Schuler Deschryver, director of V-Day Congo.

 

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/42398-focus-eve-ensler-on-the-predatory-mindset-of-president-trump

Excerpt: How is it possible that a nation of people felt OK with electing a self-confessed sexual assaulter?




From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Dristy Pat dristypat5@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 7:01 AM
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering
 
 

These people really know how to waste time on something that is, simply, not so important in a political success. They are trying to figure out why Donald Trump has been elected by the people in the USA in spite of his many false statements in the past. They are asking - if truth matter, at all, in a political election. They seem to be scratching heads to solve this dilema.

First, we must recognize, political leaders are not spiritual leaders. As a result, the success or failure of a politician does not depend on how much truthful he/she has been in the past.  Political success solely depends on politicians stand on policies that matter in the life of ordinary people. If policies are good, people will not hesitate to vote for someone with many personal flaws. That's exactly what happened to the success of Donald Trump.

Associating truthfulness to a political success is a misguided notion. It will only divert attention away from what really matter in the political success. I am sure, listeners will go home with a misguided take home message from this debate. All in all, it's a biased an anti-Trump debating platform.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, DeEldar shahdeeldar@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

Established media, social media, truth, half truth and post truth! It covers all! Enjoy!






__._,_.___

Posted by: Dristy Pat <dristypat5@gmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___

Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering



May be our mukto-mona fans of Donald Trump, who are the all-knowing  সবজান্তা  -- and "Oh what a good 'white' Male I am inside my brown skin!" should take note how some of the other citizens think ........


hen President Trump signed his first executive order in January to temporarily ban refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim nations, he said it was needed, in part, to protect women. A little-noticed part of the executive order reads, "The United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred, including 'honor' killings, other forms of violence against women." Some observers have noticed the irony in the executive order. Both the man who signed the order, Donald Trump, and the man who drafted the order, his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, have in the past been accused of committing violence against women. During the presidential campaign, Trump famously boasted about sexually assaulting women and grabbing them "by the pussy," in a leaked video recorded by NBC's "Access Hollywood." Eight women have now come forward and accused Donald Trump of sexual assault and harassment. And Trump is not alone. Stephen Bannon was charged with domestic violence and battery in 1996. Trump's first pick to be labor secretary, fast-food giant CEO Andrew Puzder, was accused of domestic abuse by his ex-wife, who even went on "Oprah" in disguise to speak about domestic violence. For more, we turn to a recent Democracy Now! interview with Eve Ensler, playwright, author of "The Vagina Monologues," and Christine Schuler Deschryver, director of V-Day Congo.

 

http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/42398-focus-eve-ensler-on-the-predatory-mindset-of-president-trump

readersupportednews.org
Excerpt: How is it possible that a nation of people felt OK with electing a self-confessed sexual assaulter?




From: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Dristy Pat dristypat5@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 7:01 AM
To: mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mukto-mona] Interesting debate in Jaipur literature gathering
 
 

These people really know how to waste time on something that is, simply, not so important in a political success. They are trying to figure out why Donald Trump has been elected by the people in the USA in spite of his many false statements in the past. They are asking - if truth matter, at all, in a political election. They seem to be scratching heads to solve this dilema.

First, we must recognize, political leaders are not spiritual leaders. As a result, the success or failure of a politician does not depend on how much truthful he/she has been in the past.  Political success solely depends on politicians stand on policies that matter in the life of ordinary people. If policies are good, people will not hesitate to vote for someone with many personal flaws. That's exactly what happened to the success of Donald Trump.

Associating truthfulness to a political success is a misguided notion. It will only divert attention away from what really matter in the political success. I am sure, listeners will go home with a misguided take home message from this debate. All in all, it's a biased an anti-Trump debating platform.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, DeEldar shahdeeldar@gmail.com [mukto-mona] <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

Established media, social media, truth, half truth and post truth! It covers all! Enjoy!




__._,_.___

Posted by: Farida Majid <farida_majid@hotmail.com>


****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration: 
Call For Articles:

http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68

http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190





__,_._,___