Mr. Mufassil Islam,
Please don't be hypocritical yourself. It's very sad that we don't check our face in the mirror first before criticizing others. You should make worse criticisms about BNP's alliance with the war criminals of 1971. Didn't we all fight against these Al Badrs and Rajakars? How many Noor Hossains did they kill? How many girls and women did they supply to Pak Army? How many intellectuals were murdered by them? What did you think when Al Badr chiefs Nijami and Mujahid became powerful ministers (more war criminals will become ministers if their alliance is elected again)? Don't you think your lecture about ideals and principles apply to your Jamaat-BNP alliance first? I didn't find any of your postings where you whined about this. Remember it is BNP who first formed the unholy alliance seven years ago. If you can answer these questions honestly, you will surely find some comfort in your heart.
This is a very simple math. With the few percent Jamaati support, BNP was able to win many seats in closely contested areas in the past election. Just check the 2001 election results. I am pretty sure if BNP gets rid of the war criminals, AL will not need JP any more. And they dislike Ershad as much as you do. Also no party wants to share power with others. How can AL form unity government when BNP-Jamaat and the extremist religious parties will never join?
Lastly, if you are sad about both alliances Ц BNP-Jamaat and AL-JP, I am with you 100%. If you want to work to break both alliances, I am with you again. But please be fair on both sides.
Thanks,
Mohammad Musa Sarkar
--- In alochona@yahoogroup s.com, mufassil islam <mufassili@.. .> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Readers:
>
> Awami League declared that they would form a Unity Government if voted to power.
>
> I am utterly disgusted as:
>
> Firstly, it is surely paving the way for BAKSAL and ways to confirm permanent Hasina Dynasty by subjugating opponents with political enticements and
>
> Secondly, how can Awami League be so hypocratical to make or even think of making Ershad - the President whom we struggled to throw out through our 90's revolution? If they instal Ershad- that will be a kick to our democratic norms and all the values Awami League is always known to have upheld - No religious fanaticism and no support for military rules in any form or definition. This has been a major area against BNP by Awami League.
>
> We, as members of the public and we as ex-students of Dhaka University and we, as memebers of the democratic movements during Ershad's regime who witnessed Noor Hossain's dedication of life demand clear and unambiguous answer from Awami League rulers. Please do not forget even there are well respected Awami League leaders who were also victims of Ershad's iron-rule during his despotic rule.
>
> Mufassil Islam
> Human Rights Advocate
> UK
>
>
>
> To: alochona@... : ezajur.rahman@ ...: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:54:55 +0000Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Will you be able to tolerate him as President of Bangladesh again?
>
>
>
> I certainly wouldn't tolerate Ershad as President agian.But I am undemocratic supporter of the CTG.You on the otherhand should tolerate Ershad.As he can only be President now as a product of the democratic verdict of the citizens of Bangladesh exercising their human right to vote freely. Cue the sweet singing of birds, romantic violins and the sound of children playing happily...Democracy in Bangladesh is possibly giving rise to Ershad as President.Banglades hi politics! It's like a Marx Brothers film - without the witty comments...- -- In alochona@yahoogroup s.com, mahathir of bd wouldbemahathirofbd @ wrote:>> ┬ From newspaper report, it seems that┬ Ershad joined┬ With AL as Hasina Agreed to make him president of bangladesh.> ┬ > ┬ With the same dream Ershad is with hasina though the declared policy of these two parties are opposite . one┬ is secular and┬ another is pro-islamic and declared islam as state religon.> ┬ > ┬ Recently Ershad himself said in a meeting at barisal that the marriage of his party with that of hasina is the┬ marriage of opportunist, not idealistic.> ┬ > ┬ > ┬ Should support such a marriage of opportunism?> ┬ > ┬ the biggest question , see below in red > > > > > ржПрж░рж╢рж╛ржж ржХрзЗ ржЖржмрж╛рж░┬ ржмрж╛ржВрж▓рж╛ржжрзЗрж╢рзЗрж░ ржкрзНрж░рзЗрж╕рж┐ржбрзЗржирзНржЯ рж╣рж┐рж╕рж╛ржмрзЗ ржЖржкржирж╛рж░ рж╕рж╣рзНржп рж╣ржмрзЗ ?>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ ________
> Live Search presents Big Snap II - win John Lewis vouchers
> http://clk.atdmt. com/UKM/go/ 117442309/ direct/01/
>