Banner Advertiser

Thursday, January 8, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Bangladeshi companies need to learn from Indian companies

Dear Bangladesh Govt.
 
I like to urge Bangladesh Businessmen to produce quality products for the consumers, even though you may get quick bucks out of no compliance,  but once you get caught you will loose everything.  Doing business with thinking customers safety first and their well being is the most important in this world.
 
I also urge AL Administration to develop carrot and stick policy in every sectors, so quality products can be produced with assuring either its medicines, fish, food, confectioneries, cooking oil, restaurants, stock markets, exports whatever it is.  Quality awareness should be set-up in every industries in Bangladesh to survive in this world.  Conspirators should be provided exemplary punishment, so dishonest businessmen stop their crime against humanity.
 
Regards,
M. M. Chowdhury (Mithu), Virginia, USA
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indian Company Fights to Survive
By HEATHER TIMMONS and JEREMY KAHNORM>IV>
Published: January 8, 2009
NEW DELHI — The Indian outsourcing company Satyam was struggling on Thursday to determine the extent of a financial fraud that has left it fighting for survival as investors began to search for ways to recoup their loses.
"We have launched a process to ascertain Satyam's financial condition, particularly its liquidity position," the interim chief executive, Ram Mynampati, said, a day after Satyam's chairman, B. Ramalinga Raju, admitted to overstating profits as well as overstating the amount of money owed to the company.
Mr. Mynampati said Satyam was working to find enough cash to pay its employees, suppliers and creditors. Satyam's "liquidity is not very encouraging at this point," he said, and it was working to collect money owed from customers.
Analysts at First Global Securities, a broker firm, said in a report that Satyam did not have enough cash to pay salaries at the end of the month. "With Satyam's operations failing to generate the required amount of cash, we believe that it will be impossible for the company to continue its operations," the report said.
While the company's founder may have admitted committing the largest corporate fraud in Indian history when he said he made up $1 billion out of thin air, Satyam's auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, could pay the price.
Investors are expected to go to court to recoup some of the billions of dollars in equity destroyed. Most are not expected to go after the company, they are aiming at Satyam's auditor.
"Pricewaterhouse has signed the balance sheets, and so they are responsible if there has been a falsification," said Ravi Nath, a lawyer with the Rajinder Narain law firm in New Delhi. The firm has been contacted by several investors looking to sue the auditor.
"If you're an auditing company and your client says they have $1 billion in cash, you do check with the bank," said Hugh Young, the head of equities for Aberdeen Asset Management, which was a Satyam investor until it sold its holdings as problems came to light.
Mr. Nath said that while auditors were dependent on information they got from a company's management, "they do have to verify that information."
Pricewaterhouse audited Satyam for at least eight years, and signed off on its filings with securities regulators in the United States, Europe and India. The company has drawn criticism from Indian officials.
"We will soon take coordinated action in the strictest possible manner against erring company officials and auditors," P. C. Gupta, India's corporate affairs minister, said in a televised interview.
Pricewaterhouse said Thursday in a statement that it had applied appropriate accounting standards to Satyam's books. It said it would cooperate with regulators.
Price Waterhouse, which merged with Coopers & Lybrand in 1998 to form PricewaterhouseCoopers, has been doing business in India for more than 100 years. It is the only major accounting firm that does business under its name. Foreign auditors are barred from signing off on balance sheets of Indian companies by an act passed in 1949, but Pricewaterhouse's presence predates that act.
On Thursday, at a news conference, Mr. Mynampati said Satyam had not yet talked with Pricewaterhouse about why it might not have caught the financial misstatements.
Taking the accounting firm to court may be investors' only chance to recoup losses. Satyam, which serves as the back office for hundreds of corporations, providing everything from billing to technology support, is virtually out of cash and is expected to be sold, whole or in parts.
The company's physical assets, like computer networks and desks, are tied to the companies that Satyam serves and would be worth little on the open market. And its work force of more than 50,000 could scatter.
Mr. Mynampati said Satyam would engage a new investment bank to explore the possibility of a sale or merger of all or part of the company. In late December, the company had engaged the investment bank Merrill Lynch to advise it on "strategic options," but Merrill Lynch terminated its relationship with the company a day before Mr. Raju's revelations.
__._,_.___

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___