Let me reveal the mind-set of BAL's and their syndorm of mind control game, I mean, how they think, why they do, what they do and what their thought paterns are and who control them. And why the BALists become the India's and Zionist's whore.
Why do people call a war a freedom's war? when war is a war is a war is a war. Why did Bush name the war in Iraq as an "Iraqi freedom"? Why did we call the war between India-pakistan in 1971 as a "Bangladeshi freedom"? Why did Indira's famous assertive "Hajar saloka badla lay liya" does not ring a bell to BAL's ears?
What is in a name, in a phrase? that which you call a freedom's
war(i.e.,shadinotar judho). by any other name would it be as "political asset" as is today for BAL or would it smell as sweet as you may think of it? by any other name will you be able to fool us as much as you think you're fooling us today?
So the way we name a war, has something to do with it after all, does not it? If we call it, a war of aggression, it doesn't become as a "political-asset" as a freedom's war does?
Is there any direct connection between a phrase and the meaning it represents? Could an "Iraqi freedom" i mean "Bangladeshi freedom" has been called by "any other name"? Perhaps the study of words for some people may be uninteresting but if we studied properly, it may well prove as exciting and novel as unearthing the mysteries of "comsmic's dark-matter."
No war can be defined as freedom's war unless it is a grand deception to fool people. Labeling or naming a war with freedom be it "Iraqi" or "bangladeshi" is misleading and a doublespeak in an orwellian sense of the word. The concept of Freedom's war is a euphemism of a war of aggression.
The concept of "shadinotar-judho" is being euphemized by the vested interested groups in bangladesh. One may be against "judho" but not against independence. Since it was labeled as "shadinotar-judho" and if you are against the "judho", you are being labeled him as "shadinotar-birodho", hence the concept of rajakar had evolved as more systematic, more determined, liars, than the supporter of
BAL, cannot, in my opinion, be found in the world.
Yes the then Pakistani regime did a lots of mismanagement and perhaps they had treated us as a second class citizen, so does the Hasina's regime to her citizen now-a-days, so does the indian central government to their citizens, so did the British to Indians but India never waged war in the name of freedom's rather they called it "Quit India" movement and Indians were able to sent back the mighty British forces without a war of "Indian freedom" and got her independence. Indian's "Quit India" movement didn't create a concept of rajakar nor a pro-freedom nor an anti-freedom false sentiments among their citizens.
East Temor got their independence without a fight as well. Why could we not have had lived with indians, nor could we have had lived with Pakistanis and now we are unable to live among ourself? but why?
Perhaps Pakistanis had indeed treated us as a second class citizen, but don't you think for a moment that by dumping Golam Azam's son for his father's alleged crime might indicate that BAL regime itself being as assertive as Pakistanis and treating Azam's son as a second class citizen? and the then Army chief Mr. Moin's unilateral decision itself constituted another crime for which you are now defending him?
Mr. Shafiq, in which way or how does Golam Azam's position differ for your position? you are supporting a wrong decision of Hasina's regime and Golam Azam might have had supported Pakistan's regime. Where is the difference between you and Golam Azam?
It is wrong to punish son for his father's political position. I heard Golam Azam was the sole leader behind the language movement in 1952 that later named as 21 feb instead of 13 falgun. Why did the BAL name it ekoshe feb? It appears as if an innocent tricks but there is a sign of how they think in order to control people's mind.
For dumping Golam Azam's son from the Army post without a due process is a crime in itself and should be punished for showing mental disorderness by the then military chief Moin.
I think, Mr. Shafiz Bhuiyan, is emotionally parroting a bal's official line of reasonings and he is displaying a disturbing trends in his reasonings as well.
The BALs are a nation of pathetic losers, criminals, and drunkard, indeed.
------------------------------------
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/