Banner Advertiser

Thursday, September 27, 2007

[ALOCHONA] Re: Khaleda: ACC may sue Tarique Zia

Dear Alochok Wouldbemahathirofbd

Yes I do have personal enmity with those who disgraced the country.
Why should it be otherwise? I know him to be a corrupting influence
in the country. And I know how hard real documentary evidence and
substantive witnesses are hard to find in a country so corrupt. Which
country are you living in?

You may not like this CTG but that doesn't mean you have to get so
high and mighty about the law or civil rights. Since when were civil
rights and the law something to brag about in Bangladesh? The day may
come when every citizen can access and defend his civil rights but no
need to get all sentimental about Tarique!

You are rand to say "At last..." You, and I, have seen nothing yet. The true story of Tarique will emerge soon enough. For now I welcome you to stand outside his prison window with your candlestick and sing songs of freedom.

If you truly understood how extraordinary the crisis is in Bangladesh
you would understood how extreme the corrective measures must be.

BNP cannot reform with a free Tarique.

So for the good of the country Tarique must be removed from politics,
voluntarily or involuntarily. BNP needs that and the country needs
that.

Spare me the sentimental song about letting the people decide. If two
frogs are annointed party chairperson by the idiots in the party high
command – then one frog or the other will be Prime Minister of
Bangladesh. That's not the real people's choice.

I understand you weep for him. But just add him to the list of
hundreds of thousands who have suffered unfairly since 1971. There is
nothing unique about Tarique that you have to mention his rights and
not the rights of those who have been destroyed by BNP or AL
governments.

100,000 Bangladeshis in Kuwait are paid half of what they agreed with
the agents in Bangladesh. I can't help one of them go to a court in
Kuwait – because not on of them has a signed contract with the agent!
And not one of them will testify against an agent because they are
afraid of the agents' political connections inAL and BNP.

Documentary evidence and substantive witnesses are nice. But if you
don't have them then you have to work with what you've got.

Chose:

1. Tarique Rahman is released due to a lack of evidence and the law
is upheld.

2. Tarique Rahman is arrested, in spite of a lack of evidence, to
enable BNP to reform.

I prefer the second. Its an easy choice because I believe him to be
corrupt anyway. What do you believe? Don't bluff with talk about the
law – either you believe he is corrupt or you believe he is not
corrupt or you are not sure.

Either way, Sonya was killed at BUET by BNP thugs – and BNP was not
punished. Let Tarique suffer on behalf of his cherished Chattra Dal.

I think it's fair.

And so do many, many more of my countrymen.

Regards

Wouldbemujibofbd
Kuwait


--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, mahathir of bd
<wouldbemahathirofbd@...> wrote:
>
> It seems that you have personal enmity with tareq Rahman and hence
you have no problem even if he is held just for political reason.
>
> Did you ask for any illegal advantage from tarreq which he didn't
provide for which you are so vindictive to him.
>
> We have heard and read story in views papers that tareq had
smuggled 11, 22 sometimes 35 thousands crore tk .
>
> But at last we see, he has been sued for 5 crore tk only
including daily dinkal which he has disowned.
>
>
> porbat has given bith of mushik at
last !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> Ezajur Rahman <ezajur.rahman@...> wrote:
> Dear Alochoks
> Many BNP people like to say that Tarique has not been charged,
that he is innocent and that he is being held for political reasons
alone.
> I have no problem if he is held for political reasons alone.
> But it is good news that he is to be sued shortly.
> Good riddance.
> Regards
> Ezajur Rahman
> Kuwait
>
>
>
> ACC likely to sue Tarique today
> Courtesy New Age
>
> The Anti-Corruption Commi-ssion is likely to file a case today
against Tarique Rahman, the detained elder son of the BNP
chairperson, Khaleda Zia, who is also detained in jail, on charge of
submitting false wealth statements.
> `The case was scheduled to be filed with the Kafrul police by the
Anti-Corruption Commission's deputy director Zahurul Huda tonight,
but it could not be filed as the first information report was not
readied till 7:30pm.,' said a source in the commission Tuesday
evening.
> Zahurul Huda told New Age on Tuesday that the case would be filed
this morning after getting permission from the commission chairman,
Hasan Mashhud Chowdhury.
> `The commission, during preliminary investigations, unearthed
Tarique's assets beyond his known source of income, and he [Tarique]
would be sued on charge of owning ill-gotten wealth,' a source to
close the investigation told New Age.
> Tarique claimed in his statement submitted to the commission on
June 10 that he owned Tk 78.39 lakh in assets apart from a house at
Gulshan on lease and five tolas of gold ornaments.
> The joint forces arrested Tarique on extortion charges on March
8, about six month before the arrests of his mother, Khaleda Zia,
also a former prime minister, and his younger brother, Arafat Rahman,
at his house in the Dhaka cantonment.
> The commission on May 29 notified Tarique, also senior joint
secretary of the BNP, to submit his wealth statements.
> Khaleda, now in a special jail after her arrest on September 3 on
corruption charges, also submitted her wealth statements showing that
he owned two houses at Gulshan and the Dhaka cantonment, and more
than Tk 3.54 crore in bank accounts and fixed deposits.
> The matter is under investigation by the anti-graft task forces
on serious crimes and corruption, the official said.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
> Subhan Allah- Only Allah flawless
> Alhamdulillah - All praise to be of Allah
> Allahhuakbar - Allah, the Greatest
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------Would Be
Mahathir of BD
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> If it can be imagined, it is possible- NEC
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
> Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at
Yahoo! Games.
>


[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/