Banner Advertiser

Monday, June 1, 2009

[ALOCHONA] Re: Was our military short-staffed during the BDR Mutiny and if so why?

If we take the hypothetical scenario that the army moved regardless of political orders and flattened Pilkhana with the consequence of a direct face off with the government and then Hasina acceded to India's proposal to send a peace mission that would have probably clashed with the army what would have happened to those command officers then in India? Were they diverted there not to prevent a military move against the BDR mutineers but to stall any subsequent collision between the army and the government putting the military high command in two minds?

--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Enam Haque <enam28@...> wrote:
>
> Not true. Army was ready to do a full fledged attack. Also the RAB was ready to carry out its own assault. Military commanders inside Peelkhana gave a reasonable estimate to PM, and other policy makers. But the PM and her team refused and decided to do political solution to the mutiny while the nephew of the PM was busy clearing the 3 km within Peelkhana for the top mutineers to escape.
>  
>


------------------------------------

[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alochona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:alochona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:alochona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
alochona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/