Banner Advertiser

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

[mukto-mona] Who's In Control? A Reminder - In Their Own Words

Who's In Control?

A Reminder – In Their Own Words.

 

"The US is leader of the free world, and under this administration is beginning to act like it. If the Europeans don't like it, that's too bad. It's too late to do anything about it now."

(US Vice President George Bush, Chicago, Aug 16 1982.)

 

US imperialism has been advancing throughout the world steadily since it became industrialised more than a century ago. Like the British empire and other empires before it, including pretenders to empires such as the German Nazis, it is guided by immutable principles irrefutable and laws inherent and intrinsic in its national and global socio-economic relationships.

Except for the primitive communism necessarily practiced by tribes or societies for their own needs, and when it became possible to produce an economic surplus over requirements, societies have always consisted of socio-economic classes, where one class economically exploits and lives off the other – the one owning the means of production of wealth, the other, owning no means of production themselves and therefore entirely dependent on making or producing wealth for the owners of the means of production for a tiny share of the product in order to live. Each era had its particular set of classes with opposing socio-economic relations – owner and slave, patrician and plebeian, feudal landowner and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, and capitalist or bourgeoisie (French: capital owning class) and proletarian (working class by hand or brain). In short: exploiter and exploited.

Capitalism's inherent unsustainability is that it cannot remain confined in one country if it is not to stagnate and collapse. It must continually expand into ever increasing sources of cheap raw materials, cheap labour, and markets for the goods and profit as excess capital it produces.

Since capitalism is therefore inherently ultimately unsustainable, it can only survive by imperialism and war.

The history of this is evident and exemplified here – in their own words:

"Got Mit Uns."

(God is with us. Inscribed on Nazi Wehrmacht belts.)

"God... has marked the American people as His chosen nation to finally lead in the regeneration of the world."

(US Senator Albert Beveridge, 1900.)

"To see freedom sent around the world, this is our mission... It was God's charge to us."

(US Senator Barry Goldwater.)

"You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope for man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness."

(Ronald Reagan, 1964.)

"I have long believed that there is a divine plan which has entrusted this land to a people with a special destiny."

(US President Ronald Reagan, 1981.)

"I have read the Book of Revelations and yes, I believe the world is going to end."

(Caspar Weinberger.)

"You know, I turn back to your ancient prophets in the Old Testament and the signs foretelling Armageddon, and I find myself wondering if — if we're the generation that's going to see that one come about."

(US President Ronald Reagan, Oct 18 1983.)

"If it takes a bloodbath... let's get it over with."

(Ronald Reagan, Governor of California.)

"What are they going to say about us? What are those people 100 years from now going to think? They will know whether we used those weapons... Well; what they will say about us a hundred years from now depends on how we keep our rendezvous with destiny. Will we do the things that we know must be done and know that one day down in history, a hundred years or perhaps before someone will say 'thank God for those people back in the 1980s for preserving our freedom, for saving for us this blessed planet called Earth'."

(Ronald Reagan, in his 1984 television election debate.)

"Retribution will be ours unless we put the world in order."

(US President Ronald Reagan.)

 "In an ideal world we'd have God for President. Nothing is less appropriate for this nation. …so He will speak to His supporters in the polling booths and advise them of His Chosen Man. …candidate Reagan… believes what God tells us… He's for Adam and Eve and he's against what they call the Theory of Evolution… he's for America being number one again, having the strongest military since Creation… Capitalism is enshrined in the Book of Proverbs… Material wealth is God's way of blessing people who put Him first."

(US Moral Majority Born Again Christian leader Reverend Jerry Falwell.)

It might be said that these are the words of crackpots and bigots. Very well, let's see what respected upstanding "responsible" leaders have to say:

"Fate has written our policy for us; the trade of the world must and can be ours. And we shall get it, as our Mother England has told us how... We will cover the ocean with our merchant marine. We will build a navy to the measure of our greatness... Our institutes will follow our trade… American law, American order, American civilisation, and the American flag…"

(US Senator Albert Beveridge, 1898.)

"...to set forth the political, military, territorial and economic requirements of the United States in its potential leadership of the non-German world area, including the United Kingdom itself as well as the Western hemisphere and the Far East. The first and foremost requirement of the United States in a world in which it proposes to hold unquestionable power… Co-ordination and co-operation of the United States with other countries to secure the limitation of any exercise of sovereignty by foreign nations that constitutes a threat to the minimum world area essential for the security and economic prosperity of the United States."

(Economic and Financial Group of the US Council of Foreign Relations. 1940.)

"The measure of our victory will be the measure of our domination after victory."

(US Council of Foreign Relations Director Isaiah Bowman, Dec 15 1941.)

"… England… will be so impoverished economically and crippled in prestige that it is improbable that she will be able to resume or maintain the dominant position in world affairs that she has occupied for so long. At best, England will become a junior partner in a new Anglo-Saxon imperialism in which the economic resources and the military and naval strength of the US will be the centre of gravity… The sceptre passes to the US."

(Annual Convention of the Investment Bankers' Association of America, Dec 10 1940.)

"...the British Empire as it existed in the past will never re-appear and that the United States may have to take its place. ...must cultivate a mental view toward world settlement after this war which will enable us to impose our own terms, amounting to perhaps a Pax-Americana."

(US Advisory Committee on Postwar Foreign Policy, May 6 1942.)

"My dear Americans, we may be short of dollars, but we are not short of will... We won't let you down. … Standards of life may go back. We may have to say to our miners and to our steel workers: "We can't give you all we hoped for. We can't give you the houses we want you to live in. We can't give you the amenities we desire to give you." But we won't fail."

(British Labour Foreign Secretary Bevin to the American Legion, Savoy Hotel, London, Sept 10 1947.)

"If the threatened war comes, one of the leading America generals said not long ago that while London and most of Britain would be quickly destroyed, Britain would remain useful as an aircraft carrier for American bombers; they would still be able to use the excellent aerodromes built by Americans in East Anglia."

(New Statesman and Nation March 27 1948 )

"Today Americans know that they are the dominant Power in the world; they take pride in the position, they accept the responsibility of it, and they expect the rest of us to respect their leadership."

(Tory Lord Woolton, Sunday Times, July 16 1950.)

"Mr. Bevin went to New York, determined to prevent the precipitate rearmament of Germany... He failed... Faced with an American ultimatum... he toed the line."

(New Statesman and Nation, Dec 2 1950.)

"We British must recognise that American policy must prevail, if there is an honest difference of opinion between us as to what to do next in the world struggle. He who pays the piper calls the tune."

(Labour MP Commander King-Hall, National Newsletter, June 28 1951.)

"Consultation would be a matter of a telephone call as United States planes with atom bombs took off for targets."

(United States News and World Report, Dec 21 1951.)

"The United States will in fact have no other choice but to establish a world order it is able to live with, a world where there is relatively free access to the world's resources."

(US Wall Street Journal, Nov 26 1979.)

"We must be prepared for waging a conventional war that may extend to many parts of the globe. Many of the resources that we need for energy and many essential strategic minerals are found thousands of miles from our shores... If we are to safeguard our access, and the access of the free world, to these resources, we must increase our military and naval strength."

(US Defence Secretary Caspar Weinberger, April 28 1981.)

"As the largest producer, the largest source of capital, and the biggest contributor to the global mechanism, we must set the pace and assume the responsibility of the majority stockholder in this corporation known as the world... Nor is this for a given term of office. This is a permanent obligation."

(Leo D. Welch, Secretary-Treasurer of US Standard Oil Company, 1946.)

"It will become increasingly difficult in the near future to protect US overseas interests with conventional weapons... I have in mind situations far from our shores,... where we would have difficulty, from a logistics point of view, at least, in reaching the areas in which we have considerable US interests. Such situations could well involve a non nuclear power... We just would not have the capability, quantitatively and qualitatively, to take care of the situation with conventional force...

…the need for the United States to look more and more overseas for the resources to provide economic strength... We will be looking increasingly towards Africa and the Middle East, as well as South America, for the materials required by our industrial economy... We will require free access and intercourse with many far distant nations of the world in order to remain a leading export - import nation…

We may have confrontations with non-nuclear states such as Cuba. We may have confrontations with nuclear or non-nuclear nations whose geographical location is such that we have no adequate means of protecting our interests with conventional weapons... The use of nuclear weapons with varying capabilities might be the only effective method of accomplishing our objectives, protecting our interests, and minimising the overall death and destruction that might accrue."

(Vice Admiral Gerald E. Miller, US Navy, House of Representatives, Washington 1976.)

"Commercial and industrial predominance forces a nation to seek markets, and where possible to control them to its own advantage by prepondering force... An inevitable link in a chain of logical sequences: industry, markets, control, navy bases."

(US naval historian Alfred Mahan.)

"We must maintain armed forces all over the world. The United States may have to occupy more countries before the cold war is ended."

(US Vice President Barkley, New Orleans, May 22 1950.)

"The United States, as an island nation heavily dependent on overseas raw materials, must continue its forward deployment of forces in Asia and the Pacific region. There is no cheaper way to American security."

(US Defence Secretary Frank Carlucci.)

"To use our strategic air power successfully we must have bases so located around the world that we can reach any target we may be called upon to hit."

(US Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee.)

"The West could, with relative impunity launch atomic attacks on the Soviet Union from a perimeter of 360 degrees, manned by more than 250 allied bases."

(General Norstad, US Supreme Commander of NATO, in The Times June 14 1957,)

 "Both our interests and our ideals propel us westward across the Pacific."

(US President Nixon.)

"Now the Pacific has become an Anglo-Saxon lake, and our line of defence runs through the chain of islands fringing the coast of Asia."

(US General MacArthur, Daily Mail March 2 1949.)

"Geographically, our territory extends to the Aleutians, Hawaii and Guam in the middle of the Pacific Ocean... We are a global power with global tasks. We have to be prepared to fulfil the tasks facing us in Asia in the same ways as we are prepared to fulfil them elsewhere."

(Former US Defence Secretary Brown.)

"US global power projection rests upon a co-operative Caribbean and a supportive South America. The exclusion of Old World maritime powers from Cuba, the Caribbean and Latin America has helped the United States generate sufficient surplus power for balancing activities on European, Asian and African continents...

Any United States power base, be it in Latin America, Western Europe or the Western Pacific, cannot be allowed to crumble if the United States is to retain adequate extra energy to be able to play a balancing role elsewhere in the world. For a balancing state like the United States, there is no possibility of flexible global action if its power is immobilised or checked in any one area."

(From the Santa Fe Document, Inter-American Security Inc. Washington, 1980.)

"We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order..."

(Washington Post, May 1991.)

"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all."

(US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbot, Time, July 20, l992.)

"We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world."

(Professor Arnold Toynbee, Institute for the Study of International Affairs, Copenhagen, June l931.)

"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent."

(Council on Foreign Relations member James Warburg, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, February 17, l950.)

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. …capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups."

(US Professor Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, 1966.)

"The New World Order will have to be built... in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece…"

(US Council on Foreign Relations, April l974.)

"Somebody has to take governments' place, and business seems to me to be a logical entity to do it."

(David Rockefeller, Newsweek International, Feb 1 1999.)

"… our policy must be both "global", ie: embrace every part of the world, and also "total", ie: include political, psychological, economic, military and special measures integrated into one whole.

In Europe we started with economic aid. It is quite possible that without the Marshall Plan we would have found it more difficult to form NATO. …a co-ordinated foreign policy using every kind of pressure, resulted in the creation of what we hoped was a solid military union…

In Asia… the importance of preliminary economic preparations for the alliances we wished to make. …military measures will often be found unobjectionable if the way to them is paved with economic aid...

By the use of economic aid we succeeded in getting access to Iranian oil and we are now well established in the economy of that country. The strengthening of our economic position in Iran has enabled us to acquire control over her foreign policy and in particular to make her join the Baghdad Pact. At the present time the Shah would not dare even to make any changes in his cabinet without consulting our Ambassador...

For us to have in Asia, Africa and other under-developed areas a political and military influence as great or greater than we obtained through the Marshall Plan in Europe. It is necessary for us to act carefully and patiently, and in the early stages confine ourselves to securing very modest political concessions in exchange for our economic aid (in some exceptional cases even without any concessions in return). The way will then be open to us, but at a later stage, to step up both our political price and our military demands...

…we should pick out the countries with anti-communist governments friendly to us, which are already bound to the US through stable long-term military agreements. In this case governmental subsidies and credits may take the form mainly of military appropriations. The hooked fish needs no bait... At the same time economic support for those strata of the local business community which are ready to co-operate with the US should be increased and the necessary conditions would be created for businessmen of this type to be put in key economic positions and accordingly for their political influence to be increased...

Such countries may be given direct economic aid as well but we must give them only as much as is necessary in order to keep suitable governments concerned in power and to check any hostile opposition elements."

…includes those countries which pursue or tend towards a neutralist policy. In this case the main emphasis in economic assistance as regards government subsidies and credits should be on creating conditions in which eventually the economic relations established by us would work for and make it natural for these countries to join military pacts and alliances inspired by us. The essence of this policy should be that the development of our economic relations with these countries would ultimately allow us to take over key positions in the native economy... By this means we can hope to divert the foreign policy of these countries in a more desirable direction.

…support should be given in particular cases and within due limit, to native businessmen who are struggling against their colonial status… if we do not support them we lose all hope of exercising a restraining influence on them until it is too late. If this happens the desire for independence may result in a nationalism so strong as to escape not only from the control of the old colonial powers but also from our own control.

Extensive economic aid to all three groups of countries should always be presented as an expression of a sincere and disinterested desire on the part of the US to help and co-operate with them."

(Millionaire Nelson Rockefeller, US Council on Foreign Relations, to President Eisenhower, January 1956.)

"We will never be able to put into effect our joint plans in this vital area unless quite exceptional efforts are made to check European tendencies towards neutralism, pacifism and unilateralism… If argument, persuasion and compacting the media fail, we are left with no alternative to jolt the faint-hearted in Europe through the creation of situations, country by country, as deemed necessary, to convince them where their interests lie. This would call for appropriate action of a sensitive nature which we have frequently discussed..."

(US NATO Supreme Commander Alexander Haig, in a letter to Secretary General of NATO – ex Nazi Joseph Lunz, June 1979.)

"Intervention is justified wherever it becomes necessary to guarantee the United States' capital and markets."

(US President Taft, 1912.)

"We do control the destinies of Central America... Until now Central America has always understood that governments which we recognise and support stay in power, while those we do not recognise and support fail."

(US Under Secretary of State Robert Olds, 1927.)

"The United States could never permit another Nicaragua, even if preventing it meant employing the most reprehensible means."

(Zbigniew Brzezinski, June 1980.)

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves."

(Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, about Chile prior to the CIA overthrow of the democratically elected government of socialist President Salvadore Allende in 1973. )

"I am against any interference in the internal affairs of the Latin American countries. But under certain conditions I consider exceptions possible."

(Henry Kissinger.)

"I spent thirty-three years and four months in active service as a member of our country's most agile military force - the Marine corps... And during that time I spent most of my time being a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for capitalism... Thus I helped make Mexico, and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped to make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the national city bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. I helped make Honduras right for American fruit companies in 1903."

(Testimony of US Marine Corps General Smedley Butler, McCormack Dickstein Committee. 1935.)

QUESTION:

"...I saw the helicopters... Americans moving towards our village... huge, towering men... we sat there huddled together... American appeared at the entrance... fired point blank at grandmother Toan. She sank slowly to the floor... grenade... I crawled out... bodies of my sister, little brother, uncle Duc, cousin Thu and her baby... Americans returned... mutilated bodies with bayonets... baby in convulsions... I hid... heard uncle Huong's voice... I asked him "is anyone else alive?" "No little one, everyone's killed." Please, tell me why were they all killed?"

(Twelve year old Vo Thi Lien, survivor of the US massacre of the inhabitants of the village of Son My, Vietnam (My Lai on US military maps) March 16 1969.)

ANSWER:

"Let us suppose we lose Indochina. The tin and tungsten that we so greatly value from that area would cease coming. We are voting for the cheapest way that we can to prevent the occurence of something that would be of a most terrible significance to the United States of America, our security, our power and ability to get certain things we need from the riches of the Indochinese territory and from Southeast Asia."

(US President Eisenhower, justifying US aid to France's war against Vietnam, Aug 4 1953; which later included the offer of the use of nuclear weapons during the seige of Dien Bien Phu.)

"Geographically, Vietnam stands at the hub of a vast area of the world - Southeast Asia - an area with a vast population of 249 million persons... He who holds or has influence in Vietnam can affect the future of the Philippines and Formosa [now Taiwan B.M.] to the East, Thailand and Burma with their huge rice surpluses to the West, and Malaysia and Indonesia with their rubber, ore and tin to the South... Vietnam thus does not exist in a geographical vacuum - from it large store-houses of wealth and population can be influenced and undermined."

(Former US Ambassador to South Vietnam Henry Cabot Lodge, Cambridge, Massachussets, in the Boston Sunday Globe, Feb 28 1965.)

"It is rich in many raw materials such as tin, oil, rubber and iron ore... This area has great strategic value... It has major naval and air bases."

(US Secretary of State Dulles, March 29 1954.)

"One of the world's richest areas is open to the winner of Indo-China. That's behind the growing US concern... tin, rubber, rice, key strategic raw materials are what the war is really about. The US sees it as a place to hold - at any cost."

(US News and World Report, April 4 1954.)

"… strategic resources of Southeast Asia and their significance for the global system that the US was then constructing, incorporating Western Europe and Japan. It was feared that successful independent development under a radical nationalist leadership in Vietnam might 'cause the rot to spread', gradually eroding US dominance in the region and ultimately causing Japan, the largest domino, to join in a closed system from which the US would be excluded… The idea that US global planners had national imperialist motives is intolerable to the doctrinal system, so this topic must be avoided in any history directed to a popular audience."

(Noam Chomsky, "The Vietnam War In The Age Of Orwell.")

"Agreement On Ending the War and Restoring Peace In Vietnam. January 27 1973. (The Paris Agreement.)

Article 21.- The United States anticipates that this Agreement will usher in an era of reconciliation with the Democratic Republic of Vietnam as with all the peoples of Indochina. In persuance of its traditional policy, the United States will contribute to healing the wounds of war and to postwar reconstruction of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and throughout Indochina.

"1. The Government of the USA agrees to contribute to post-war reconstruction in Vietnam without any political conditions.

2. The US contribution will fall in the range of 3—25 billion dollars of grant aid over 5 years."

Signed: For the Government of the United States.

        William P. Rodgers.

        Secretary of State."

(Agreement on ending the Vietnam war, 1973.)

Not one dollar has been paid.

"Well folks, that just about wraps up Vietnam. So let's all have a party and get outta here…"

(Admiral of the US command fleet, USS Blue Ridge, departing Vietnam for the last time, May 1 1975.)

Not about oil? They must be joking!

"Our aim is not simply to appropriate oil in one way or another (say in easily accessible Nigeria or Venezuela) but to crush OPEC. Therefore we have to use direct force in order to get hold of large and concentrated oil deposits which can be opened up rapidly so as to put an end to the artificial oil shortage and thus to lower the price... Since this is the ultimate and there is only one target possible: Saudi Arabia... Fortunately, these are not only rich oilfields but they are also concentrated in a very small area, a fraction of the Saudi Arabian territory... While Vietnam was full of trees and brave people and our national interest was almost invisible, what we have here is no trees, very few people and a clear objective."

(Advisor to the US Defence Department Professor Miles Ignotas, March 1975.)

"The economic health and well-being of the United States, Western Europe, Japan depend upon continued access to the oil from the Persian area."

(President Carter, Department of State Bulletin, April 1978.)

"Western industrialised societies are largely dependent on the oil resources of the Middle East region and a threat to access to that oil would constitute a grave threat to the vital national interests. This must be dealt with; and that does not exclude the use of force if necessary."

(US Secretary of State Alexander Haig, March 11 1981.)

"In the future, we are more likely to be involved in Iraq-type things, Panama-type things, Grenada-type things… Our position should be the protection of the oilfields. Now whether Kuwait gets put back, that's subsidiary stuff."

(Chairman of US Armed Services Committee Les Aspin, 1990.)

"They know we own their country [Iraq]. We own their airspace… We dictate the way they live and talk. And that's what's great about America right now. It's a good thing, especially when there's a lot of oil out there we need."

(US Brigadier General William Looney, Washington Post, August 30 1999.)

"US aid is to "improve U.S.-Kazakh military cooperation while establishing a U.S.-interoperable base along the oil-rich Caspian."

(U.S. State Department Report, 2002.)

"In oil's name, the United States is immersed in a new kind of colonialism, for the resources that lie under foreign feet. They couldn't care less about the people. Therein lies an even greater tragedy."

(U.S. Dept. of State, Congressional Budget Justifications: Foreign Operations, Fiscal Year 2003.)

And finally, some words of wisdom:

"The foreign policy that monopolistic capital imposes is a ruinous one for the people of the United States. The United States had some thirty billion dollars in gold in its reserves at the end of the Second World War; in twenty years it had used up more than half of these reserves. What has it been used for? With what benefit to the people of the United States? Does the United States perhaps have more friends now than before?

… But what kind of liberty is it that they are defending, that nobody is grateful to them, that nobody appreciates this alleged defence of their liberties? …What country has prospered and has achieved peace and political stability under that protection from the United States? What solutions has it found for the great problems of the world? The United States has spent fabulous resources pursuing that policy; it will be able to spend less and less, because its gold reserves are being exhausted.

… the United States has been carrying out a repressive and reactionary policy in the international field, without having solved the problems of a single underdeveloped country..."

(Fidel Castro, quoted by US journalist Lee Lockwood, May 1965.)

 

Compiled by Brian Mitchell. EVOLUTION.

 

This collection of quotations has been gathered from the following books by the same author:

 

1917 AND ALL THAT

The Untaught History Syllabus

In Their Own Words – A Political History Of The Cold War 1917-1983.

Brian Mitchell

 

MY FELLOW DISBELIEVERS

The Untaught Book Of Enlightenment For The Common Man

In Their Own Words

Compiled by Brian Mitchell.

Mental Health warning:

This book is dangerous to those with a British education.

It could change your mind (If you still have one.)

 

THE UNTAUGHT PHILOSOPHY SYLLABUS

Understanding The Hidden Nature Of Capitalism And How It Works

Or Marx For Beginners – Philosophy and Economics.

(Including Marx's essential exposé of the capitalist socio-economic system.)

Brian Mitchell

 

A fourth, non-political book:

THE WRITER'S, AUTHOR'S AND JOURNALIST'S COMPUTER GUIDE

A MORE OR LESS COMPLETE COMPUTER GUIDE FOR MORE OR LESS COMPLETE COMPUTER USERS

(Or Even Beginners)

WINDOWS AND WORD MORE FULLY EXPLAINED

(Updated for Windows 2000 and Word 2000.)

Written by a writer, with writers, authors and journalists in mind. And those who work alone without an IT department.

A wealth of fully explained and easy to understand guidance, instruction, tips and tricks and information of all sorts, including what to buy, how to set it up, how to maintain it and how to fix it when it throws a tantrum.

Aims to give all‑round competence and confidence to anybody who wants to use a computer as a fully featured writing machine without feeling like a dummy or idiot.

Brian Mitchell

 

 

__._,_.___

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona 
http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari
http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm

*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/

****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
               -Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___