JitenDa IRT: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto- mona/message/47991
I will come to you on this later. For now I just want to remind you that yes it is you who wrote the following:
"It (an electron) has to move with that speed to counter-balance strong nuclear force."
Just say that it was slip of the pen. And then every thing will be over.
You are again wrong (to a person who wrote two Ph.D. disserattions on nuclear physics, I should rather say 'slip of the pen'.) JitenDa, the net force acting on a swirling stone is not zero. Since it is constantly changing its direction, even though it may be moving with a constant speed, it has a net acceleration and hence a net force. This argument must apply to the orbiting electron too.
There is another mistake (or slip of the pen!) The force on the ball is not tangential, it is radial. Depending on the case, it is either electrostatic (electron) or gravitational (the earth) or the force applied by my finger on the string to the other end of which has been tied the stone.
Regards.
-Subimal __._,_.___ Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ Blog Archive
Link List
AddvertiseReffaral Link |
Sunday, April 27, 2008
Re: [mukto-mona] Aparthib's quantum analogy and racial discrimination.
JitenDa IRT: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto- mona/message/47991
I will come to you on this later. For now I just want to remind you that yes it is you who wrote the following:
"It (an electron) has to move with that speed to counter-balance strong nuclear force."
Just say that it was slip of the pen. And then every thing will be over.
You are again wrong (to a person who wrote two Ph.D. disserattions on nuclear physics, I should rather say 'slip of the pen'.) JitenDa, the net force acting on a swirling stone is not zero. Since it is constantly changing its direction, even though it may be moving with a constant speed, it has a net acceleration and hence a net force. This argument must apply to the orbiting electron too.
There is another mistake (or slip of the pen!) The force on the ball is not tangential, it is radial. Depending on the case, it is either electrostatic (electron) or gravitational (the earth) or the force applied by my finger on the string to the other end of which has been tied the stone.
Regards.
-Subimal __._,_.___ Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |