Banner Advertiser

Thursday, May 15, 2008

[mukto-mona] ABC News: Obama gaffes on Iraq and Afghanistan

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/05/obama-gaffes-on.html

Obama Gaffes on Iraq and Afghanistan
Email
Share May 13, 2008 8:27 PM

ABC News' David Wright and Sunlen Miller Report: Sporting a shiny new
American flag pin at an appearance in Rush Limbaugh's hometown, Sen.
Barack Obama came up with some novel reasons why the U.S. may be
struggling in the war in Afghanistan.

"We don't have enough capacity right now to deal with it -- and it's
not just the troops," Obama, D-Ill., told a crowd in Cape Girardeau,
Missouri.

Obama posited -- incorrectly -- that Arabic translators deployed in
Iraq are needed in Afghanistan -- forgetting, momentarily, that
Afghans don't speak Arabic.

"We only have a certain number of them and if they are all in Iraq,
then its harder for us to use them in Afghanistan," Obama said.

The vast majority of military translators in both war zones are drawn
from the local population.
Naturally they speak the local language. In Iraq, that's Arabic or
Kurdish. In Afghanistan, it's any of a half dozen other languages --
including Pashtu, Dari, and Farsi.

No sooner did Obama realize his mistake -- and correct himself -- but
he immediately made another.

"We need agricultural specialists in Afghanistan, people who can help
them develop other crops than heroin poppies, because the drug trade
in Afghanistan is what is driving and financing these terrorist
networks. So we need agricultural specialists," he said.

So far, so good.

"But if we are sending them to Baghdad, they're not in Afghanistan,"
Obama said.

Iraq has many problems, but encouraging farmers to grow food instead
of opium poppies isn't one of them. In Iraq, oil fields not poppy
fields are a major source of U.S. technical assistance.

There are other infrastructure problems both countries share that
U.S. advisors have struggled to address -- a lack of safe roads,
schools, adequate electricity, etc. -- but Obama did not mention
these.

Obama's overall point may well be true: that U.S. efforts in Iraq
have come at the expense of the battle against al Qaeda in
Afghanistan.

Still it's not asking too much to expect the man many say will soon
be the Democratic nominee to cite the right facts to back up his
thesis.

UPDATE: Bill Burton, Obama campaign spokesperson, disputes this
report, writing in to say, "This poorly researched and written piece
is inaccurate in that it just completely ignores the need for Arabic
translators in Afghanistan, and the need for agricultural specialists
in Iraq. It is irresponsible to report such issues so matter-of-
factly without checking out the actual facts. Please reference these
very simple and easy to find websites to learn more about these
issues: on the need for agricultural specialists in Iraq; and on the
foreign fighters in Afghanistan.

To which, ABC News' David Wright responds:

Interesting pushback from the Obama campaign on this story. It begs a
response.

They point out that the U.S. has indeed deployed agricultural experts
to Iraq, in an effort to work with aid organizations to rebuild
Iraq's food infrastructure. Other technical experts were deployed
early on to southern Iraq to help rebuild the ravaged ecosystem of
the Marsh Arabs, whom Saddam Hussein sought to exterminate. The U.S.
and its allies sent much and varied assistance to the Iraqi people,
including agricultural aid. My bad.

However, Obama's point seemed to be that the Iraq effort constituted
a brain drain in the Afghanistan agricultural problems, that the
experts deployed to Iraq would otherwise have gone to Afghanistan to
encourage Afghan farmers to grow food not poppies. That strikes me –-
as someone who has covered the conflicts in both countries
extensively -- as doubtful.

The main problem now in both Iraq and Afghanistan is the lack of
security, which makes it too dangerous for the experts to do their
work.

As far as that goes, Obama's overall point –- as noted in the
original piece –- is probably valid. The vast numbers of troops
needed to secure Iraq (unsuccessfully) have had an impact on the
troop available for Afghanistan. Neither country is particularly safe
right now. (Then again, Obama wants to start withdrawing the troops
from Iraq. Would that make it any safer for agricultural experts and
aid organizations to lend whatever hand is needed there?)

As for the point about Arabic translators needed for Afghanistan, the
Obama campaign points to the well-documented presence of foreign
fighters there, many of whom do speak Arabic. However, these folks
are mostly shooting at NATO troops, not talking to them.

No doubt there are a handful of Arabic speakers employed at Bagram
and Kandahar and other detention centers to interrogate foreign
fighters captured on the battlefield. But I have not seen any reports
that there is a shortage of such personnel, or that the need for such
translators in Iraq has hamstrung the interrogators in Afghanistan.

Foreign fighters captured in BOTH Iraq and Afghanistan have also been
sent to detention centers such as the one in Guantanamo. Is there a
shortage of Arabic translators there or at other U.S. detention
facilities overseas? That would be an interesting news story. Again,
I haven't seen any proof of it.

To reiterate: Obama's main point may well be fair: that Iraq has made
Afghanistan tougher to win by stretching our resources too thin. But
are these really the best examples for him to cite of why this may be
the case?


------------------------------------

*****************************************
Sign the Petition : Release the Arrested University Teachers Immediately : An Appeal to the Caretaker Government of Bangladesh

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/university_teachers_arrest.htm

*****************************************
Daily Star publishes an interview with Mukto-Mona
http://www.mukto-mona.com/news/daily_star/daily_star_MM.pdf

*****************************************

MM site is blocked in Islamic countries such as UAE. Members of those theocratic states, kindly use any proxy (such as http://proxy.org/) to access mukto-mona.

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates 5th Anniversary

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/5_yrs_anniv/index.htm

*****************************************
Mukto-Mona Celebrates Earth Day:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Earth_day2006/index.htm

*****************************************
Kansat Uprising : A Special Page from Mukto-Mona

http://www.mukto-mona.com/human_rights/kansat2006/members/


*****************************************
MM Project : Grand assembly of local freedom fighters at Raumari

http://www.mukto-mona.com/project/Roumari/freedom_fighters_union300306.htm

*****************************************
German Bangla Radio Interviews Mukto-Mona Members:
http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/german_radio/


Mukto-Mona Celebrates Darwin Day:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/Special_Event_/Darwin_day/index.htm


*****************************************

Some FAQ's about Mukto-Mona:

http://www.mukto-mona.com/new_site/mukto-mona/faq_mm.htm

****************************************************

VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/


****************************************************

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:mukto-mona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:mukto-mona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mukto-mona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/