Mr. Firoz Alam:
Thanks for your post. I have several questions. To start with....HUH? Am I missing something here or are you off of your medications?
Secondly, the great defenders of Mr. Munshi should know that I have nothing against him. I am opposed to his pseudo-intellectualism and the doctrines of nonsense and puritanism. If you want to engage in an "intellectual debate", then the substance of your argument must be debate-worthy and of intellect, right? So far the rubbish that I had read from Mr. Munshi is propaganda and not worthy of an intellectual debate. His so-called "India Doctrine" is a display of his megalomania, his obsession with India and undying support for the failed state of Pakistan, and wishful thinking that his professed "doctrine", what it may be, would be the founding principles of some anti-India movement. He is a Mowdudi wanna-be, but only worse. If you want to engage in an intellectual discourse, you will have my undivided attention and respect, even if I disagree with you. But if you try to pass horse-shit as a sound doctrine with some intellectual foundation, then you are going to have find a dumber audience.
Your comment about India and Pakistan shows that you know nothing about international politics. It's called "sphere of influence". Look it up in a reputable book, preferably not written by Mr. Munshi. I won't recommend Wikipedia either. The economic, geographic and military dominance of our two nuclear neighbors make it inevitable that the lives of 150 million Bangladeshis would be affected in some form or shape. Bangladesh also has two (dis)advantages; a) proximity, i.e. one of India's largest markets, b) mindless drones are supportive of their former oppressor, Pakistan. So, yes, be it market dominance or political leverage, India and Pakistan does have plenty of interests in influencing the lives of Bangladeshis.
Lastly, I can tell that you are our version of a proverbial "Bible thumper"! I hate to break this to you, but there is no clay or smokeless fire. It's only flesh and blood, and more fundamentally, atoms. Don't take the scriptures so literally! But that's besides the point. Do you mind telling me who is treating whom like a pest? I can only respect Mr. Munshi and his gang as human beings, as I respect every human being, whether they are muslim, hindu, jew or even a fire-worshipper. I doubt Mr. Munshi and his gang has the same level of respect for anyone else but themselves.
Cyrus
From: Firoz Alam <afirozny@yahoo.com>
To: alochona <alochona@yahoogroups.com>; khabor khabor <khabor@yahoogroups.com>; notun bangladesh <notun_bangladesh@yahoogroups.com>; Dahuk <dahuk@yahoogroups.com>; Mukto Mona <mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 3:36:27 AM
Subject: [ALOCHONA] Mr Cyrus and Ms. Farida
| Mr Cyrus and Ms Farida, The anatomy of Mr. Cyrus' cat and Ms. Farida's hound metaphors are perfect examples of how one can and should use to get rid of predatory pests is to foster their natural enemy - hound for sheep-destroying wolves, cats for rats, rats for coalition of willing scavengers, mongooses for snakes and parasites for parasites instead of transforming Mr. Munshi into victim, and not an intellectual opponent - even if what he stands for, does not fancy one of your taste? By the way, I don't think its India's or pakistan's interest to take care of 150 millions of peoples' destiny in any form or shape as we can't go back to Isha Khan's empire. But having mutual interests among all corporations which is known as nations should be of our reciprocate interest. By the way, species among all including human were created using three components of nature's water, clay and smokeless flame which came from thunder/lightening [and lightening is one of Allah's attributes] according to Quran, so animal species are our brethren. And if we accept the protocol of how species including human were created like pottery i.e., evolved then should we not all work for improving our happiness instead of treating each other as predatory pests? Think about it. Firoz Alam. |
__._,_.___