Banner Advertiser

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

[vinnomot] Azam Chowdhury and Sheikh Hasina

Azam Chowdhury and Sheikh Hasina


After attending the annual meeting of the Prime Bank at the Lakeshore Hotel at Gulshan in Dhaka on January 24, 2008, the plaintiff, Azam J Chowdhury said he had not sued Sheikh Hasina. She was not named on the first information report of the case and he did not, actually, file any case accusing Sheikh Hasina
   directly.
   If this is true as Azam told news reporters, who is responsible for disgracing Hasina? Why our courts are wasting time, energy and money from government exchequer in the name of trial of the extortion case? On the other hand, Azam, the plaintiff of that case, told news reporters that he had given money to Sheikh Selim for securing his business deal. Will he not be accused for giving bribe?
   Gopal Sengupta
   Canada

Published in the Daily New Age on January 31, 2008 www.newagebd.com

 

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___