Banner Advertiser

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

[vinnomot] Re: [notun_bangladesh] Re: [banglarnari] Is Bangladesh a Sovereign Nation?

Despite the  frequent diturbance of some 'turkman' forces Bangladesh is still a Sovereign country.

Musfique Prodhan <chena_kew@yahoo.com> wrote:

It is a pleasure to see Md Asghar concentration on a subject matter which is important. What he have depicted about the foreign officials involvement in Bangladesh's internal matter is true indeed.

What he might have overlooked is the way our political culture has been structured. Though we might feel 'delight' in calling the system as parliamentary democracy; matter of fact it is dynastic hierarchy disguised under democracy.

When respect for opposing political view is difficult, when the political movement is aimed to raise to power only, when arson, looting and anarchism is a habitual normal political activism, when the corrupts reign;  it is still a wonder about that country to exist as sovereign state.

The unfortunate and unwanted dominance of partisan personals in the media, makes it impossible for non partisan views to be heard. Things got worse, when the media have started competing with other business institution in the rat race. Hence the voice of the millions are ignored.

Since birth, Bangladesh have been governed by weak administrators ( with an exception of President Ziaur Rahman). Hence  Bangladeshis have become an  dependent nation  with a sovereign  status. The economy is primarily based on foreign remittance and export items, with the West in the center. In addition to that, each year a handsome amount of foreign aid is also necessary ( in form of  debt) to run Bangladesh. Though insulting to our self dignity, we have no choice left but to practice on their "advices/suggestions" without crying foul. 

However, it is our morally corrupt politicians, who are solely responsible for literally inviting the foreign emissaries to get involved in our political arena. I believe Md Asghar is also aware of the presence of so called "The Tuesday Group" (consists of foreign diplomats) who play a decisive role in our political arena.

India's negative attitude towards Bangladesh has earned her bad reputation among Bangladeshis. Hence any suggestions good or bad constitute to mistrust and create controversy.

It is going to take enormous effort and massive change in political culture to clean the mess up which was created by our politicians in last  30+ years. Since such  goal  is attained, we have to swallow our own pride and be  the sovereign nation under covert occupation.


Sincerely


Musfique.




msa40@aol.com wrote:
Dear Moderator,
 
Please post this write up. Thanks.
 
Mohammad Asghar
 
Is Bangladesh a Sovereign Nation?
Mohammad Asghar
I do not know of any other nation in which foreign Ambassadors and High Commissioners are as publicly active as those who are accredited to Bangladesh. Some examples:
1. When Awami League and Bangladesh Nationalist Party were at loggerheads on the appointment of a Chief Advisor of the Caretaker government, various emissaries from different nations descended on Bangladesh to help the feuding parties arrive at a consensus. The Secretary General of the Common Wealth was one of the foreign emissaries to have blessed Bangladesh with his presence on its soil
His and other luminaries’ presence and involvement in the feud was not an interference in the internal affairs of Bangladesh!
But when the Country Director of IMF complained against hartals, Mr. Saifur Rahman of BNP promptly threatened his expulsion from Bangladesh for his [unwanted interference] in what he termed to be the purely domestic affair of Bangladesh.
2. Foreign Ambassadors and High Commissioners are very generous while dispensing their advices to the government and the people of Bangladesh. Take, for instance, the role Mr. William Malam (!) played, while he was representing the United States in Bangladesh.
After visiting the Chittagong Stock Exchange, he told the reporters: [Bangladesh, like Kuwait, is floating on oil. Its reserve of gas is inexhaustible, so Bangladeshis should not be worried about their future].
The fact is: Bangladesh does not have a commercially viable reserve of oil. It's gas reserve is going to become depleted by 2015, if it fails to discover new wells well in time (see the Daily Sangbad of Jan 28, 2008).
So, why the Ambassador lied through his teeth?
He knew Bangladeshis are prone to easily believing the foreigners; they find it difficult to believe their own kind.  He exploited their psychology to gain cheap popularity among the people of this unfortunate country.
3. Prior to the event of 1/11, the most active notables in Bangladesh to keep the press busy were the Ambassador of the United States and the High Commissioners of the United Kingdom. How many meetings they had with the political leaders of Awami League and BNP and the high officials of the government cannot be said with precision, but the fact remains that in the army’s decision to force the mind of the obnoxiously pro-BNP President of the country in favor of a new Caretaker government,  they played a major and vital role.
Even today, the British High Commissioner continues to play an effective role in the political life of Bangladesh. He can be seen on the TV screens talking about what the government of Bangladesh should or should not do now or at the time of holding the ensuing national elections of the country.
So far as I know, no intellectual of the country, in particular, and its common people, in general, has so far talked against the foreigners’ involvement in the affairs of the country. On the contrary, they appear to be pleased with them, for, they seem to reckon, Bangladesh does not have the capacity or the ability to make good decisions on matters that affect the life of its citizens.
But this attitude of the intellectuals of Bangladesh does not apply to the High Commissioner of India and its influential people. To many of them, any Indian, who speaks about Bangladesh, is an enemy of theirs and he or she, therefore, must be demonized in all possible ways.
What I saw in Bangladesh during my stay in it, and am still seeing from a distance, makes me ask: Is Bangladesh really a sovereign nation and if those Bangladeshis, who rule the country or have influence over its affairs, are really patriots? Can they ever do anything that would benefit their country and its ordinary people?  
 




Start the year off right. Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___