Ms. Farida Majid, you and we all know Jamaat-E-Islam comes into politics by selling Islam for political reason not preaching the true Islam. Mr. Abul Ala Moududi, the founder of Jamaat-E-Islami always followed the harshest version of Islam, which was uncommon to our sub-continent until his arrival. Islam in undivided
Allah created his creation with differences, with variation, variation in color, religion, creed, nationality, language, culture so on for sure reason. Allah created day and night with such distinct difference. Allah created man and women, again so much distinctly different but then again there is a natural unification works flawlessly. Jamaat works against Allah's rule of distinct difference then again welcoming unification. Jamaat chooses conspicuously against the unification of Allah's creation and favors only the distinct difference. No one human is better then another but their work. Work of Jamaat is to create Fitna among Allah's creation, some time with two-nation theory, sometime with unknown overpowering Islami Jojba, other time bringing population demography. In recent days, Mr. S.A. Hannan a leading member of Jamat-E-Islam think-tank taking refuge to World of Crap site in search of a smoking gun and become laughingstock. All his frantic actions are to prove every state of Mr. S.A. Hannan, As a Muslim I find it hard to believe a real Muslim will support the mockery on Allah, Islam and his prophet (PBOH); present constitution of
In one of your earlier posting on April of 2009 (Alochona) You said -Restoration of 72 constitution will mean deleting faith in Allah as a pillar of state policy, restoration of socialism, deleting Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim ( in the name of beneficent and merciful Allah) and also banning all Islamic parties.- Let us analyze each point you made from Islamic perspective: Nineteen Seventy Two constitution of Bangladesh, which we (Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Buddhist and other faith) earned waging an independence war that you and Jamaat-e-Islami vehemently opposed not using peaceful means but waging a war against people of Bangladesh. I thank you for correctly stating the words restoration of 1971, what it mean is going back to its ideological originality with what the country was founded. What Awami League government is doing has no forceful innovation. Democratically elected parliament constructed 1972 constitution on the other hand inclusion of Islam as state religion, faith in Allah, inclusion of Bismillah and allowing religion to be used as tool for politics rather then worshipping Allah was not constituted by parliament rather proclamation by undemocratic military regime.
Now with the history in hand, tell me Mr. S.A. Hannan, who waged the ideological warfare by changing the constitution? Is it the constitutionist of 1972 or the later proclamationists' military government?
Four pillars of 1972 constitution may not be Islamic but it was not anti Islamic or to defame Islam. But the later changes in constitution by autocratic Gen. Zia and Gen. Ershad regime is not just anti democratic but surely anti Islamic as well, here is my argument as a Muslim, please read.
Constitution of any country is the mother of all law and must to follow to its fullest strength, right? All other law of the land, such as Civil Law, Criminal Law, and Land Law etc comes under the framework of constitution, right?
Here is very important point; any law, which contradicts with the mother of all law therefore constitution, becomes null and void, right?
Now let me come to the point. Current constitution puts its faith in Allah, calls
Now, Mr. S.A. Hannan, please tell me as a Muslim how in the world a constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran in the preamble, claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law which authorizes a 18 years or old girl to get laid by getting state issued prostitution license!!!!! ! Mr. Hannan, I say Nousubillah, will you say that too? Constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran in the preamble, claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law which authorizes one to get state issued license to open bar to serve alcoholic beverage!!!! Mr. Hannan, what will be your answer to that? Constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran (Rahim ( in the name of beneficent and merciful Allah) in the preamble, claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law which authorizes one to get state issued license to drink alcoholic beverage!!!! ! Mr. Hannan, what will be your answer to that? Constitution that starts in the name of Allah and puts Aiyaa of holly Quran in the preamble claims Islam as state religion constitutes Civil Law that authorizes one to get state issued license to setup gambling!!!!. Mr. Hannan, I say Nousubillah will you say that too? Mr. S.A. Hannan, I with very limited knowledge in Islam as well as constitutional laws can site hundreds of anti Islam, Anti Allah, Anti Rasul (PBOH) law that goes against the preamble of constitution that starts with in the name of Allah. I am ashamed that Muslims of Bangladesh does not understand that by inclusion of Allah and his religion Islam in our constitution and calling our state religion as Islam is nothing but mockery, disrespect and ridiculing Islam for mere political gain by mischief politician's certainly not out of love for true Islam. Merciful Allah who created this earth and our solar system, allowed it to be inhibited by those who believe in Allah and those who do not. Gave them knowledge to find the truth and said, on the Day of Judgment you will be asked how you used your knowledge, until then you are on your own to belief or disbelief. Alas, we being the creation of Allah wants to change the rule of creator and make rules contrarily to his rule and appoint our self as judge for our makeshift judgment day. This is very sad that we are not ready to wait until his called judgment day but wants to handle it on our own. Inclusive Islam that spread like a breakneck stream throughout the world with the word Salam to all, believers and non-believers alike now only wants to embrace ones and disowned the others. Mr. S.A. Hannan, you said What is the need for doing all these? Islamic provisions in the constitution are not any problem because Islam grants all other religious communities all fundamental rights ( Madinan society under the Prophet is the greatest proof where Jews were granted all civil, political and religious rights under the constitution made by the Prophet. ).It is true that in a state where Muslims are in great majority, Islam will get special position .This does not create any problem because other communities' rights are properly protected as per Islam.In entire history of Islam , all Muslim states whether Khulafae Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mughals or Usmani regime in Istambul, Islam had very special position. It was natural thing.This should remain so Mr. S.A. Hannan, who gave you the authority to GRANT when Allah granted this world to all, its land, its air, its stream of water then what right you have to use the word grant being a receiver of his mercy. . Let me point you to an argument, Muslim living in US a christen majority country do not curtail their religious beliefs too, what will be your argument Mr.Hannan. Religious rights of other faith prevailed on the days our Rasul (PBUH), but no longer in many cases in many Muslim majority places. Practice of religion of other faith is no longer allowed in Unnecessarily as an argument to special treatment to Islam, you said: All Muslim states whether Khulafae Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mughals or Usmani regime in Istambul, Islam had very special position. It was natural thing.This should remain so. It was Allah's wish, and Sahabaya Ikrams judgment, that after the death of our fourth Khulafa-e-Rashideen the Political Islam ended because by then it was clear that this could not sustain rather it creates Fitna among Muslim. Out of four Khalifah three of them was brutally murdered First Khalifah Hadhrat Abu Bakr Siddique (radhiyallahu anhu) death was normal Second Khalifah Hadhrat Umar (radhiyallahu anhu) died in the hands of Abu Lu'lu', the Majúsi (fire-worshipper) Third Khalifah Hadhrat Uthman Ghani (radhiyallahu anhu) was brutally martyred on 18th Thil Hajj, 35 Hijri. When he was martyred, he was reciting the Qur'aan Majeed. His blood fell on the aayat: Fourth and last Khalifah Hazrat Ali (radhiyallahu anhu) was martyred by Abdur Rahman Ibn Muljim on 18th of Ramadan in Kufa Your mentioned Umayyad, Abbasid, Mughals or Usmani regime in Istambul are nothing but Kingship, which is very against the rule of Islamic theology, so no comments. In an earlier posting Mr. Hannan you said: Dear sirs, there is no need for a new ideological war in this county, It will create serious conflict and turmoil and where it will end up only Allah knows.No body can be sure such change made will be sustained later..I urge al of you to keep watch over the situation and to save the country from such conflict and turmoil .Bangladesh has so many problems, we should not open this new major problem.If any of you can influence Awami League leadership ,you should do so. Mr. Hannan we hard this Jamaat-e-Islami political stunt rhetoric in 1971. When the entire nation was waging a war of liberation, Jamaat-e-Islami said the same thing. Their political doctrine of saving Mr. Hannan, you said - serious conflict and turmoil and where it will end up only Allah knows. Nevertheless, you know that scare technique did not work in 1971 therefore; it will not work this time too. BNP-Jamaat (Hannan Shah is one of them) is talking about the need for a national consensus and even need for referendum to change the constitution or to reinstate the glories of 1972 constitution. If they realy believe on what they saying then why they opposing the High Court verdict, delivered on Aug 29, 2005 (during Jamaat-BNP axis regime) scrapping the Fifth Amendment which was made through pen stoke of two General (Gen. Zia and Gen. Ershad) under Martial law proclamation and latter ratified. If BNP really believe what they say, then they have to withdraw their opposition against High Court judgment nullifying the 5th amendment. If they condemn Gen. Zia and Gen. Ershad for making such unconstitutional amendments of our constitution without proper course of law then people will accept the genuineness of their claim else not. Constitution of 1972 made unity among its people based on its culture, heritage and historical deep rotted ethnicity and the solemn spirit of our glorious liberation war rather then religion. People of Mr. Hannan Shah, no matter how much you and your party Jamaat-E-Islami attempts to create discord among our people, people will answer you right. Haven't you seen the jubilant people of Mr. Hannan Shah you have blown out once again and showed your real face, which is very much against Shamim Chowdhury
|
__._,_.___