Lecture from a completely ignorant person, a person who is also in complete denial of Paki brutalities of 1971. A person who doesn't even know or doesn't want to know which superpower was 100% behind
Look how cleverly this guy did not mention the rapes committed by his sachcha Musulman compatriots. The Pakistanis acknowledging the atrocities of their compatriots will never happen. It will be just waste of time to argue with these people, they will always deny it.
I am a bit surprised at the intrusion of this Pakistani spy in our Bangladeshi forum. According to his twisted logic, if a Hindu from
Do we expect anything better from a person from
This guy is also defending Jamaat, whereas Go Azam, the head of East Pakistan Jamaat in 1971 issued a fatwa during the war declaring all the rapes committed by Pak army as Mutta marriages. This was published in Jamaat's own newspaper at that time. So lying, deception, and covering up are once again taking their own course here.
--- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, "Saj" <SAJJAD_PAK@...> wrote:
>
> Asalam Alaikum
>
> As a Pakistani, I am not surprised with that much intensity in the debate going on between different schools of thoughts amongs Bangladeshi. One thing common, I found is the presence of spies from India, US and the zionists. But there is certainly one thing, which not only make me laugh but also surprised to me that you guys considering Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and USA as one club. This is for the first time in my life that I had ever been told that USA is our friend. Otherwise, what we experiencing in NWFP and Balochistan provinces, we can only have one faith for USA and that is that USA is our biggest enemy, bigger than India. I am not sure that you would be willing to learn about american involvments in Pakistani matters. But if you want to, I can send you as many links and materials as you want, which will educate you enough about Pakistan-US relationship.
>
> As far as the independence of Bangladesh is concern, there is no doubt that we, as a Pakistani, were against the disintegeration of Pakistan and were trying our best to stop this process at any cost. But, as now Bangladesh has become an independent country, we can only wish you best of luck for your future.
>
> I noticed that Jamat e Islami is oftenly criticised by many Bangladeshi as the Anti-Liberation element during 1971. It is very true that Jamat e Islami was opposing creation of Bangladesh. Just like they were opposing creation of Pakistan in 1947. Their logic for their opposition to the creation of Bangladesh was the same as of 1947. They believe that dis-integeration of teritories become the barrier in spreading Islam and thus is not truly favourable for Islam. But after the independence from Hindustan. Jamat e Islami became a loyal party to Pakistan and since then acting in the best interest of the country. They never did any demonstration in favour of India. The fact is that their contributions towards Jihad in Kashmir will never be forgetted. I believe that the Jamat's behaviour would be the same in Bangladesh. As the ideological people do not change their principals.
>
> The killing thing is most difficult topic of all debates between Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Both have different stand over this issue. Bangladeshis strongly believe that Pakistani military conducted massive killing operations in East Pakistan. Which resulted in death of uncountable number of Bangalis. While, on the other hand, Pakistanis believe that Pakistan's attempt to crush Anti-Pakistan demonstrations was similar to that of usual police operations, which sometimes backed by the military in usual manner in any country. And the firing, beating the protestors by the police/military men is as common in the rest of the world. You would have seen many protests inside Bangladesh, where police opened fire over their own Bangali brothers and sisters. Now, the question is that in 1971, when Pakistani Military opened fire over protestors and Anti-Pakistan elements, you declared it genocide and holocaust of Bangalis in the hands of Eastern Pakistanis. And now, when your own Bangali Police firing on you, what name you would like to give it? It would be interesting to knwo about it.
>
> Anyway, it is just one of the many reasons of why Bangalis lost their lives and wealth during 1971 unrest in West Pakistan. Which resulted in the creation of Bangladesh. One of the other theory poped up from inside India, which I am sure that you would aware with. Some female writer correctly analysed the war of 1971 by saying that their were THREE different confontrations going on at that time. War between Anti-Pakistan and Pro-Pakistan elements, War between India and Pakistan and war between Anti-Pakistan and Pakistan Army. All the accounts of killings, found in Bangali libraries of today, are dedicated to Pakistan Army. While what the Pro-Pakistan elements done with Anti-Pakistan elements, what the Anti-Pakistan elements had done with Pro-Pakistan elements, What Indian had done with Pro-Pakistan elements, What Indians had done with the post war east Pakistan, which became Bangladesh, is always remain unknown to the Bangalis and to the rest of Pakistan.
>
> One of the Bangali Freedom Fighter of 1971 Liberation movement, Lt Gen (Retd) SARDAR F.S. LODI, tells his story that how he became a Freedom Fighter, how he get trained in Indian camps on the other side of International border. What were their attitude towards Bangali Freedom Fighters. And also the activities of Indian Army after capturing East Pakistan. So the best friend of Bangladesh betryed it immediatly after its independence. This is not it. But he analysed the Indian RAW in details and described how this bloody organisation of India make its ways. He also wrote the REAL reasons of why India was interested to seperate East Pakistan from the West. A little intro to his book could be found from the following link.
>
> http://www.defencejournal.com/2000/feb/raw.htm
>
> Thanks.
>
> Saj
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: musasarkar
> To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:24 AM
> Subject: [ALOCHONA] Re: Consequence of Nizami's release
>
>
>
> US-Saudi-Pak is an exclusive club. How can anybody else make real
> friendship with them when it was your lord Jamaat and Nizami who worked
> hand in hand with Pakistan with full US-Saudi support in 1971 in killing
> and raping us abusing the name of our religion? It was your morally
> and spiritually bankrupt lord Jamaat's jihad against our women and
> innocent civilians. (And you religiously want us to forget those as
> quickly as possible). First, you have to certify those evil acts of
> 1971 as great religious duties, then you will be able to make real and
> everlasting friendship with them. You have to declare like Tarek Zia,
> "BNP and Jamaat belong to the same family and we are now inseparable."
> What more do you want us to show about a murderer and rapist unless he
> is really shameless? What do you mean by constructive? When did lying,
> covering up, defending evil, hypocrisy and deception become part of
> someting constructive?
>
> --- In alochona@yahoogroups.com, Wohid bidrohee@ wrote:
> >
> > Our million dollar question is - why you and your lord (BAL) then
> failed to make them friends while Nizami could???? Why don't you blame
> the court now that has released him? Or do you get yet another excuse to
> blaming the Bangladesh judiciary being pocketed by the anti-liberation
> forces? Then who else except you and your lord BAL left out of the
> pocket of your anti-liberation forces??? You guys are really good at
> biting at the bait when the fish jumps out of your catch!!!!! That is
> the genuine characteristics of politically and ideologically bankrupt
> fishermen. What else you still have to show us in your jihad against
> Jamaat??? Come on man, be constructive and if those anti-liberation
> forces are destructive as opposed to your constructive actions, they
> will be automatically vanished and you will gain the people's love to
> get them down and yourself up.......
> >
> > musasarkar m_musa92870@ wrote: The pressure from the axis of
> US-Saudi-Pakistan finally succeeded. Jamaate Islami's Qamaruzzaman's
> recent visit to their top master, US administration, has fully paid off.
> Even though the foot soldiers of Jamaat/Shibir always spread US-Israeli
> conspiracy theory about almost everything, we know very well who their
> real masters are. Lets hope that the Saudi blackmailing of the poor
> Bangladeshi laborers stops now at least for a little while. Our murderer
> and rapist in chief of Al Badr is their royal guest. Can anybody do
> anything about that, specially when the price of oil is hovering around
> $140 a barrel.
> > Nizami's velkibaji - Seriously sick Nizami is completely healthy right
> after his release (and they call him Moulana!):
> >
> http://prothom-alo.com/archive/news_details_home.php?dt=2008-07-16&issue\
> _id=985&nid=MTc0NzA=
> > Out of all the arrested politicians, only Saudi royal guest Nizami
> received special treatment:
> > http://prothom-alo.com/print.php?t=h&nid=MTc1MTA=
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Robin Khundkar rkhundkar@
> > To: alochona@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 1:40:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ALOCHONA] Consequence of Nizami's release
> >
> > It pays to have loving friends among the establishment in the country
> and powerful patrons abroad (USA & KSA). A winning combination with
> slick marketing to emphasize their overall reasonableness and all around
> good manners and a white wash of their blood stained traitorous past &
> present.
> >
> > Robin Khundkar
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Dr. Anisur Rahman"
> > Sent: Jul 16, 2008 7:31 AM
> > To: alochona@yahoogroup s.com, mukto-mona@yahoogro ups.com,
> banglarnari@ yahoogroups. com, dahuk@yahoogroups. com, sonarbangladesh@
> yahoogroups. com
> > Subject: [ALOCHONA] Consequence of Nizami's release
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > While the four party alliance was preparing for anti-government
> movement, Motiur Rahman Nizami was freed on bail. He is the first senior
> politician to receive bail in emergency. What will be its consequence?
> Will Jamaat make a deal with the government?
> >
> > I tryied to analyse the issue in my article published at:
> >
> > http://www.sonarban gladesh.com/ article.php? ID=177
> >
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
>
[Disclaimer: ALOCHONA Management is not liable for information contained in this message. The author takes full responsibility.]
To unsubscribe/subscribe, send request to alochona-owner@egroups.com
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___