Had Mujib lived he would have continued as a dictator - not like
Mussolini (come on!) but as a Fidel Castro (bad enough!)
Though after seeing all the pompous AL middlemen strutting around in
their black waistcoats on National Mourning Day, as if all their
years of lies and thievery were vindicated, made me feel that we
should call them - the Black Coats, quite a Fascist term!
Pity our poor country. Even our heros are killers or thieves.
--- In
alochona@yahoogroup s.com, mahathir of bd
<wouldbemahathirofb d@...> wrote:
>
> Reading mujib's lectures and seeing his failure na d fate, it
seems to me that Mujib was a boss, not a leader.
>
> Becuase leaders never loss there popularity to such a low level
that Mujib lost.
>
>
>
>
> আল্লাহ যাকে যখন ইচ্ছা
ক্ষমতা দান করেন,মাইনাস টু
ফরমুলায় তাই হাসেন
>
http://www.microsco piceye.blogspot. com/>
> --- On Fri, 8/15/08, abid bahar <abidbahar@. ..> wrote:
>
> > Bangabandu, Vs. Mousalini of Italy, Striking Similarities: Please
Read!
> Abid Bahar
>
> Bangabandu's Fourth Amendment is only the tip of the form of
his "dictatorship. "(1) There are more details, the use of Mujib
dress, Mujib Bahini, Lal bahini, Rakhi bahini and other paramilitary
forces, the extreme hero-worship tendency among his followers,
indiscriminate killing of the opponents, arresting even the elderly
statesman like Bhasani, favouratism to its party members, and so
many other similarities with Mousalini, the Italian leader and
with Spain's Francisco that when I found out, I personally was
shocked (I was a former Mujib -lover)and have been writing eversince
about the sickness.
>
> I asked myself, howcome there are so many similarities in a
country far away from Europe. The answer I found is in political
Science such a political trend is identified
as Fascism. Mousalini even did similar things like Bangabandu did,
the latter standing in the parliament, declared that he
couldn't use "Lal Ghora,"which he actually did but he wanted it to
be more severe on the opponents.
>
> There are also many similarities between Bangabandu's BAKSAL and
other Third World Fascists as Sadam's socialist bath party, the
Sheikh boys (Mujib's Chalara) carrying guns at the university, and
now Africa's Mugabe a former freedom fighter, Idi Amin, another
freedom fighter turning into a Fascist, it is unthinkable. Unlike
them, after the 7th March Speech, Bangabandu actually collaborated
with the Pak Army send Rao Farman Ali to Islamabad to save Pakistan
and later was fooled and surrendered and stayed the entire period in
Pakistan. He never talked about why did he surrender. If
Bangabandu's AL didn't have the theoritical backing/blessings from
our intellectual West Bengali and the Delhi based Dadas that AL is
a "progressive force", civil society, fighting against Nizami, and
that Bangabandu the father etc, etc.propaganda via the pro-Indian
Bangladeshi powerful medias as Daily Star and Prothom Alo etc,
he would be officially discredited as
> one of the fighters for democracy who betrayed the nation to turn
himself into a dictator and was killed similarly as Mousolini. In
Europe the above type of people are classified as the Fascist
leaders. They are discredited in the textbook for committing
excesses.
>
> It is true, mentioned in the Abul Mansur Ahamed's Amer Dhaka
Rajnitir Ponchas Botscher and in Azizul Karim's work "From Awami
League to BAKSAL" that Bangaban du "did not have a clear idea about
the difference between party and the state. This became clear even in
1956-57 when he deferred with the then Chief Minister Mr. Ataur
Rahman Khan. Mr. Khan wanted to keep the administration totally
neutral. He knew that if the administration were brought under the
party control then it would be difficult to run the administration
efficiently. But Sheikh Mujib refuted his contention and said, "The
administration has to accept party domination. Not only that
administration will just help and assist the party to execute its
policies, but the administration will also be helping in increasing
its influence among the people". Mr. Ataur Rahman Khan had to
surrender to Sheikh Mujib as he was then considered very powerful in
the party. Thus during this time Sheikh Mujibur
> Rahman as the Minister of Commerce and Industries indulged in
rampant corruption, nepotism and misuse of power. He used his power
in giving out permits, licenses, bank loans, and sanction to
establish industries to people who were loyal to him and his
cronies."(2) These were the early signs of the then Mujib's Fascist
tendencies.
>
> For the sake of knowledge, Social Scientists have to identify this
trend and locate the father of this trend in Bangladesh. It was this
type of extremism in Italy that led to Mousalini's death, and the end
of Francisco. Like Musolini, to unite people in the independent
Bangladesh Bangaband u also used extreme nationalism causing the
alienation of the tribals.
>
> Hasina carries the legacy of Bangabandu. Hasina's AL with its
Shaschasevok bahini and its alliance of parties (which is
practically the BAKSAL) continues the trend of anarchy.
>
> Like Bangabandu, Hasina also gives more importance to the party
interest to gain power than give importance to national
interest. Hasina' s year round hartal to tire the nation, caused the
cancellation of 1996 election that led to the first coming of the
care-taker government and again in 2007 the chaos led to 1/11 and
the army backed caretaker government and the uncertainity in the
nation's life.
>
> (1) Please check the following videos to see that until this trend
is not discredited, Bangladesh will have no future!
> It is infactious, nowadays everybody is doing it.
>
> (2) I want the readers to please check the historic similarities
between Bangabandu Mujib and Mosoluni. We live in an independent
country, the Fascist chaos of madness against order must be stopped.
Bangabandu should be given credit for what he deserve but his fascist
tendency should be identified and discouraged as being regressive to
Bangladesh's future development.
>
> Videos on party initiated violence in Bangladesh:
>
>