I agree with you that many Bangaldeshi are anti-Indian.
I would like to tell that India and Bangladesh should be good friends to each other. It will be difficult for Bangladesh to compromise with Pakistan because both's mentality is reverse. India can not compromise too with Pakistan and vice versa. The world knows that.
There may be some misunderstanding between Bangladesh and India in past but there is no time now to engage with that misunderstanding.
I think Bangladesh and India can paly a vital role in South Asia to make it a peaceful abode of living.The people of Bangladesh shall be more benifited if they look India in a friendly way. Pakistan can never think the development of Bangladesh.Pakistan will never love Bangladesh people by heart. This is important to understand.
We the secular people of this region can make the two counties strong economically and technologically if we saty together side by side and help each other like good friends.
Unity is strenght and we should be united keeping our geographical entity as two neibouring countries.
The world is changing fast and in this changing world we should not feel enmity on religion basis. Our existance with our self respect is depending on our tie-up like two good friends.We should not do any project which will harm the two neighbours. India and Bangladesh should understand this.
The people of both the countries will take each other as if we are from the same family but living in different houses.
My emotion for Bangladesh is at a peak because I can not forget her as my birth place and I saw the first time sun rays in Bangladesh. But we could stay there. My respect and love for Bangladesh will never die til I am alive and I shall never be able to disest any one who will desire the harm of Bangladesh. Whoever they be.
Lets come and stand side by side and lets start work to develop and lets start to create a terror free subcontinent. A fundamentalists free, a hardliners free, a middle- age -cultured Taleban free region. "Chitto jetha Bhay sunno" free region.
Sentu Tikadar
--- In mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, "mohammed saki" wrote:
>
> --- I can't agree with your suspect. Have you got any evidence? I
> think it is again one chance for you to make propaganda against
> India. Are you getting all this from ISI? I think Bangladesh
> authority should take care about you.
> Saki
>
> In mukto-mona@yahoogroups.com, "M.B.I. Munshi" wrote:
> >
> > The BDR Mutiny - revenge for Padua and Boraibari
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It is now widely believed that the barbarous mutiny at BDR HQ
> (Pilkhana)
> > in Dhaka was perpetrated in revenge for the death of 19 BSF jawans
> > killed (after they intruded on to Bangladesh territory) in the
> > counter-attack by the BDR at Padua of Sylhet and Boraibari of
> Roumary on
> > April 18, 2001. The BDR was then headed by Maj. Gen. ALM Fazlur
> Rahman
> > who has since maintained that the three BDR soldiers killed in that
> > encounter should be decorated with National Sword as Birsreshtho and
> > should be commemorated in exactly the same way as the martyrs of
> 1971.
> > This has regrettably not been done by any of the governments since
> the
> > incursion by the BSF into Bangladesh in 2001 and it was
> surprisingly not
> > one of the demands of the rebellious BDR soldiers in the Pilkhana
> mutiny
> > of 2009. While the mutineers were able to recall many injustices
> > committed against them over the several decades since independence
> this
> > single most glaring example just managed to escape their over-
> wrought
> > attention.
> >
> >
> >
> > Revenge for Padua and Boraibari was the principal justification for
> the
> > planning and execution of the mutiny but another important
> objective was
> > to have Bangladesh accept a Peace Mission from India to protect the
> > Kolkata-Dhaka Friendship train service as explained in some news
> > reports. The real purpose for this Peace Mission would be to act as
> an
> > occupying force and spark further trouble and enmity between the
> army
> > and the BDR that was likely to ensue after the savage murders at
> > Pilkhana. This would have held out the double benefit and advantage
> to
> > India of furthering their agenda for securing a transit facility
> across
> > the country and at the same time cripple the defence and security
> > services of Bangladesh. This would merely be the fulfillment of
> what had
> > been planned after the 1971 war with Bangladesh having no standing
> army
> > and the defence needs of the country being organized under Indian
> army
> > tutelage and control as spelled out in the 7 point agreement signed
> by
> > the Mujib Nagar government which had only been partly implemented
> after
> > liberation. The internal law and order situation would according to
> this
> > agreement be handled by a paramilitary force trained and equipped by
> > India's external intelligence agency RAW. The first part of this
> > plan was thwarted when the Indian army was forced to leave (which
> would
> > probably be the same fate of this proposed Peace Mission but with
> more
> > violent and disturbing consequences for India) after resentment
> began to
> > grow amongst freedom fighters and the ordinary people of Bangladesh
> > against their prolonged presence which was seen to be tantamount to
> > being an occupying force. The second part of the 1971 plan was
> suddenly
> > disrupted after the August 15, 1975 coup when the paramilitary force
> > called the Rakkhi Bahini was disbanded soon thereafter. The Rakkhi
> > Bahini earned the reputation of being an undisciplined, brutal and
> > violently vindictive force under the direct control of Sheikh Fazlul
> > Haque Moni and later Tofail Ahmed. It has now been recommended that
> > after the mutiny at Pilkhana the BDR force should similarly be
> disbanded
> > and like the Rakkhi Bahini have its members assigned to other
> security
> > forces of the country. In its place a new paramilitary organization
> > would be established and given the name - as one senior army
> officer has
> > proposed - the Bangladesh Border Force or BBF. This would be the
> > appropriate outcome for the BDR which has by its despicable and
> heinous
> > acts condemned itself to utter oblivion.
> >
> >
> >
> > A further comparison may now be made with the situation prevailing
> > immediately after 1971 relating to the suspicious role played by the
> > Awami League leadership. The conduct of the AL government during the
> > recent mutiny is increasingly coming under close and intense
> scrutiny
> > especially in its failure to act in a timely fashion to counter the
> > revolt by sending in the army directly into Pilkhana compound on the
> > very first day of the uprising. To stall such a move the AL
> > administration sent Sahara Khatun, Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza
> Azam
> > to negotiate terms with the mutineers. None of these individuals
> have
> > any experience or expertise in conducting such negotiations and they
> > carry little weight or influence within the country or party but
> were
> > nevertheless chosen. There were, however, several senior leaders in
> the
> > party who were far better qualified to undertake this task but were
> > simply not asked by the Prime Minister. It is a surprise and a
> miracle
> > that after the number of civilians that were killed or injured
> outside
> > the gates of Pilkhana these `negotiators' (Sahara Khatun,
> > Jahangir Kabir Nanak and Mirza Azam) managed to successfully dodge
> the
> > bullets and were not automatically set upon by the rebels on their
> entry
> > into the compound. Another aspect of the AL handling of the crisis
> that
> > has raised objections relates to their deliberate policy of
> dividing the
> > country on purely partisan lines on the issue of the rebellion. In a
> > time of national emergency it would be expected that the government
> > would attempt to unite the country by calling for all-party
> involvement
> > in the decision making process. Instead the AL (on the basis of
> > accusations made in the Indian press and media) started pointing
> fingers
> > at the opposition parties for complicity in the mutiny. The view has
> > been expressed in some quarters that this self-defeating approach
> to the
> > revolt was deliberate so that the army would be undermined in
> revenge
> > for their role in the 1/11 takeover and also in their pursuance of
> > corrupt politicians in the AL and their ultimate trial and
> prosecution
> > during the tenure of the two year caretaker government. This is
> entirely
> > consistent with the AL's inherent distrust of the armed forces
> > –originally encouraged and inspired by India – which also
> > existed during the government of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and became
> > greatly intensified after the coup's of 1975 which saw the AL pushed
> > into the political wilderness for the next two decades. Against this
> > inclination of the AL the people of Bangladesh will expect this
> > government to declare the victims of the mutiny as martyrs to be
> > honoured in the same way as the freedom fighters who lost their
> lives in
> > the 1971 war but which still has not been done for the BDR soldiers
> who
> > died in Padua and Boraibari while protecting the territory and
> borders
> > of the country against Indian intrusion and aggression.
> >
>
------------------------------------
****************************************************
Mukto Mona plans for a Grand Darwin Day Celebration:
Call For Articles:
http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=68
http://mukto-mona.com/banga_blog/?p=585
****************************************************
VISIT MUKTO-MONA WEB-SITE : http://www.mukto-mona.com/
****************************************************
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
-Beatrice Hall [pseudonym: S.G. Tallentyre], 190Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:mukto-mona-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:mukto-mona-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
mukto-mona-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/