Banner Advertiser

Thursday, December 6, 2007

[vinnomot] Re: [mukto-mona] A case against me


 
Dear Mr. Hannan,
Hate crimes (also known as bias motivated crimes) occur when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her membership in a certain social group, usually defined by race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, or political affiliation. Hate crimes differ from conventional crime because they are not directed simply at an individual, but are meant to cause fear and intimidation in an entire group or class of people.
 
Mr. your comments are well recorded by the TV channel and you can prove yourself that you didn't utter what you have claimed in your mail. Usually, politicians speak whatever they fit for poly tricks not for politics. But you have served under the Government of Bangladesh as a Secretary and later the Chairperson for an Islamic Bank. Your comments are not to directed simply at an individual but those comments were meant to cause fear and intimidation to the whole nation as well as the rest of the world. How come you have become a boot licker of anti liberation forces? If those evils provided you a unique opportunity to serve as the Chairperson of an Islamic Bank and you are a great beneficiary of that offer after your retirement from govt. job, Seeing no pros and cons, I must say, "You are biased to anti liberation forces and your strong affiliation to those evil forces encouraged you to do such heinous comments and you failed to take the shelter of the Press Council as well as other legal institutions against that English Daily."
 
Gopal Sengupta  
 
_____________________________________________________________________________
 

Dear members and well-wishers,
Assalamu Alaikum.
As I am receiving lot of calls from worried friends and well-wishers about the case filed against me along with others, I  can only say about myself that every single statement made by the complainant against me is false and without any basis.I have left everything to Allah .My lawyers are taking normal steps in my matter,
 
 
Please see the news item below and see the role of Daily Star.This is the paper which  made a big news of the talk  show of a channel and made a provocative headline.They also published two articles against me by  Syed Muhammad Ibrahim and Syed Badrul Ahsan.My polite rejinders have not been published though I reminded the editor by drawing his attention by name.I give below my rejoinder of the article of Mr.Ibrahim.What kind of fairness is this?
 
The  un-proved (in any court of law )insinuations made in the news item of the daily of its own volition shows the daily's  bias.
 
Shah Abdul Hannan
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: S A Hannan
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:54 PM
Subject: Fw: On the article of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim

Attention Mahfuz Anam sb
 
Dear sir,
 
Assalamu alaikum.Would you not publish this letter though 9 days have passed ?Kindly let me know .
 
Shah abdul Hannan
----- Original Message -----
From: S A Hannan
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:07 AM
Subject: On the article of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim

To the Editor,
 
The Daily Star, Dhaka.
 
 
Dear Mr Editor,
Assalamu Alaikum. I have been dismayed by the article of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim, "Well Said Your Honour " published in your esteemed daily on 29.10.07. There is no truth in his statement  quote At about 9.30 p.m. on Friday, October 26, in a television talk show on Ekushey TV titled Ekushey Shomoy, Mr. Shah Abdul Hannan a former secretary to the government of Bangladesh said that there was no Liberation War of Bangladesh, instead what happened in 1971 was civil war in Pakistan unquote
 
I have never said that 1971 was not Mukti Juddho ( war of liberation) instead it was a civil war.This is a serious manipulqation of my statement in the talk show where I did not go on my own liking. I was invited there.I was supposed to join in a discussion on current affairs.Insted I was asked questions about mostly on 1971 events.In a live talk show I had no option except answering questions asked from me from the anchor person, Mr Shariar Kabir and three journalists.I clearly said that in 1971 there was a civil war and and a MuktiJuddho ( please refer your own report on the first page on 28.10.07).In view of that the aricle of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim stands on false leg and I need not discuss other issues.
 
However i am replying to his direct question he posed to  me . quote May I ask a question to xxxxxx and  Mr. Shah Abdul Hannan: "Pakistan government in 1971 used to say that the situation in East Pakistan in 1971 was an internal law and order problem. In 2007 Mr. Shah Abdul Hannan says it was a civil war. Question: Was Bangladesh born because of political struggle alone or because of the recommendations of politicians only?"Unquote Any body may see my stance  from the website of Ekushey television or report of the daily star or from a c.d. obtained from the Ekushe.I must however add  as a student of political science that even though 26 th March was the  date  of declaration of independence of Bangladesh, the political sovereignty of Bangladesh over the territory was established on 16th December, 1971with all its legal consequences in domestic and international law..
 
 
Respected editor, please publish it without delay.
 
Shah Abdul Hannan
 
 
 __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___