Banner Advertiser

Friday, December 7, 2007

[vinnomot] Re: [Dahuk]: A case against me --to my friends and well-wishers -- Hannan Chora Rajakar

Hannan,
 
I think there are some charges against you regarding terrorist activities during '71.  I believe there are also some rape charges against you.
 
So you are a perverted terrorist.  You should be ashamed of yourself.  Why don't you go back to Pakistan and kiss the ass of your old bosses??  Or they also kicked you out??  Now are you trying to ruin Bangladesh??  How much do you earn for dalali????
 
Please note that your frineds are also dalals, no good person can be your friend.  You guys abuse Islam for pervered activities.  You guys are rapist and now trying to say that you are Muslims.......................what a munafek like attitude.
 
Have you ever thought what happened to kids who were born after your activities with women in '71?  Where are they??  Did you take care of them???  Did you obey duty as a dad to those kids???? Who says you are Muslims????
 
Guys like you must be tried at Intn'l Court for your terrorist activities in '71.
 
-MA

S A Hannan <sahannan@sonarbangladesh.com> wrote:
Dear members and well-wishers,
Assalamu Alaikum.
As I am receiving lot of calls from worried friends and well-wishers about the case filed against me along with others, I  can only say about myself that every single statement made by the complainant against me is false and without any basis.I have left everything to Allah .My lawyers are taking normal steps in my matter,
 
 
Please see the news item below and see the role of Daily Star.This is the paper which  made a big news of the talk  show of a channel and made a provocative headline.They also published two articles against me by  Syed Muhammad Ibrahim and Syed Badrul Ahsan.My polite rejinders have not been published though I reminded the editor by drawing his attention by name.I give below my rejoinder of the article of Mr.Ibrahim.What kind of fairness is this?
 
The  un-proved (in any court of law )insinuations made in the news item of the daily of its own volition shows the daily's  bias.
 
Shah Abdul Hannan
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: S A Hannan
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:54 PM
Subject: Fw: On the article of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim

Attention Mahfuz Anam sb
 
Dear sir,
 
Assalamu alaikum.Would you not publish this letter though 9 days have passed ?Kindly let me know .
 
Shah abdul Hannan
----- Original Message -----
From: S A Hannan
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:07 AM
Subject: On the article of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim

To the Editor,
 
The Daily Star, Dhaka.
 
 
Dear Mr Editor,
Assalamu Alaikum. I have been dismayed by the article of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim, "Well Said Your Honour " published in your esteemed daily on 29.10.07. There is no truth in his statement  quote At about 9.30 p.m. on Friday, October 26, in a television talk show on Ekushey TV titled Ekushey Shomoy, Mr. Shah Abdul Hannan a former secretary to the government of Bangladesh said that there was no Liberation War of Bangladesh, instead what happened in 1971 was civil war in Pakistan unquote
 
I have never said that 1971 was not Mukti Juddho ( war of liberation) instead it was a civil war.This is a serious manipulqation of my statement in the talk show where I did not go on my own liking. I was invited there.I was supposed to join in a discussion on current affairs.Insted I was asked questions about mostly on 1971 events.In a live talk show I had no option except answering questions asked from me from the anchor person, Mr Shariar Kabir and three journalists.I clearly said that in 1971 there was a civil war and and a MuktiJuddho ( please refer your own report on the first page on 28.10.07).In view of that the aricle of Syed Muhammad Ibrahim stands on false leg and I need not discuss other issues.
 
However i am replying to his direct question he posed to  me . quote May I ask a question to xxxxxx and  Mr. Shah Abdul Hannan: "Pakistan government in 1971 used to say that the situation in East Pakistan in 1971 was an internal law and order problem. In 2007 Mr. Shah Abdul Hannan says it was a civil war. Question: Was Bangladesh born because of political struggle alone or because of the recommendations of politicians only?"Unquote Any body may see my stance  from the website of Ekushey television or report of the daily star or from a c.d. obtained from the Ekushe.I must however add  as a student of political science that even though 26 th March was the  date  of declaration of independence of Bangladesh, the political sovereignty of Bangladesh over the territory was established on 16th December, 1971with all its legal consequences in domestic and international law..
 
 
Respected editor, please publish it without delay.
 
Shah Abdul Hannan

 
 
 
 
 
 
Committed to PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO KNOW
Thursday, December 6, 2007 09:16 AM GMT+06:00  
   
Front Page

 
A sedition case was filed with a Dhaka court yesterday against Jamaat-e-Islami Secretary General Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed, Assistant Secretary General Abdul Quader Mollah and ex-chairman of Islami Bank Shah Md Abdul Hannan.

The court ordered Tejgaon Police Station to register it as a regular case filed against the three for their anti-liberation activities.

In the petition case filed with the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's Court, petitioner Mohammad Fazlur Rahman also appealed to the court to issue arrest warrant against the three accused.

After hearing the petition, Metropolitan Magistrate Mohammad Emran Hossain Chowdhury passed the order to Tejgaon police and directed the officer-in-charge (OC) to submit a report after proper investigation into the matter.

The accused worked against the Liberation War and carried out massacres by forming Al Badr, Al Shams and Razakar forces in 1971. Thus they committed sedition, the case statement said.

Moreover, the accused recently started making fresh derogatory remarks on the Liberation War by terming it a civil war, and denying the existence of anti-liberation forces.

"I have been compelled to take refuge of the law since the state, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs, home ministry and freedom fighters' organisations have not taken any legal action against the war criminals," said complainant Fazlur Rahman, a freedom fighter of Sector-2.

The case statement mentioned that Mojaheed, who was the social welfare minister of the BNP-Jamaat-led four-party coalition government, on October 25 denied his party's anti-liberation role, and claimed that anti-liberation forces never existed in the country. On the next day, Hannan, also a former chairman of the National Board Revenue, in a private satellite television talk show termed the Liberation War a 'civil war' and made derogatory remarks on it.

Quader Mollah at a discussion on October 31 said the freedom fighters joined the Liberation War being allured by beautiful Indian women, and for grabbing property of the Hindus in the country. Three criminal cases including one for sedition were filed against Quader with a Madaripur court for his derogative remarks.

By denying the Liberation War, they have committed sedition, the complaint said. "We will have to bear the shame forever if these criminals are not punished for their heinous crimes," argued Fazlur, a resident of south Kamerkanda in Keraniganj.

He filed the case under sections 121-A and 123 - A of Bangladesh Penal Code. The sections deal with the sedition charges and punishment for committing such offences.

Section 121-A says whoever within or without Bangladesh conspires to commit any of the offences to deprive Bangladesh of the sovereignty of her territories or any part thereof, or conspires to overawe by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force, the government, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or any shorter term.

In the case, the complaint made the editor and news editor of the Prothom Alo and editor the Bhorer Kagoj as witnesses.

When contacted last night, Tejgaon police said they are yet to get copy of the sedition case filed with court.

According to newspaper reports, speeches and statements of those accused of war crimes, and findings of different probe bodies including the People's Enquiry Commission, Mojaheed, who was president of the then East Pakistan Islami Chhatra Sangha and chief of the infamous Al Badr Bahini back in 1971, helped the occupation Pakistan army commit massacre, loot and rape.

Only two days before the Liberation War ended, he led the killings of renowned academics, litterateurs, doctors, engineers, journalists and other eminent personalities to leave the nation intellectually crippled.

Quader Molla was known as a 'butcher' to Bangalees in Mirpur of Dhaka in 1971. Mirpur at the time was mainly populated by non-Bangalee Muslim migrants from India, many of whom actively collaborated with the occupation army.

One of the largest mass graves of people butchered by Pakistani troops and their lackeys was discovered in Shialbari area of Mirpur after the independence. Quader was behind the killing of thousands of Bangalees in Shialbari and Rupnagar areas of Mirpur in 1971. He had started killing people even before the occupation army's mass killing, local people said.

Jamaat was constitutionally banned for its anti-liberation activities. But the ban was lifted in 1976.
 


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. __._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___